Important aspects of nursing care in surgical wards as expressed by nurses

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 512-520

  Idvall, Ewa ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clinical nursing research; Focus groups; Health care; Quality assurance; Quality indicators; Surgical nursing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERIOPERATIVE NURSING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; WORK;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; JOB DESCRIPTION; KNOWLEDGE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PERIOPERATIVE NURSING; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 0032196021     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00180.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Carper 13. (1978) Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Sciences 1(1), 13-23.
2. Donabedian A. (1980) Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring Vol. 1. The Definition of Qualily and Approaches to its Assessment. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
3. Fern E. (1982) The use of focus groups for idea generation: the effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. Journal of Marketing Research 19(February), 1-13.
4. Fitzpatrick R. & Boulton M. (1994) Qualitative methods for assessing health care. Quality in Health Care 3, 107-113.