Testing the direct-access model: GOD does not prime DOG

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 1128-1140

  Huntsman, Laree A ^a  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALEXIA; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY; PERSONALITY TEST; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUE;

DYSLEXIA, ACQUIRED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; WORD ASSOCIATION TESTS;

EID: 0032193325     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206163     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. AARONSON, D., & FERRES, S. (1983). A model for coding lexical categories during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 700-725.
2. ANDREWS, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 802-814.
3. ANDREWS, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 234-254.
4. BARON, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 241-246.
5. BAUER, D. W., & STANOVICH, K. E. (1980). Lexical access and the spelling-to-sound regularity effect. Memory & Cognition, 8, 424-432.
6. BECKER, C. A. ( 1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 556-566.
7. BECKER, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8, 493-512.
8. BECKER, C. A., & KILLION, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 389-401.
9. BESNER, D., DAVIES, J., & DANIELS, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 415-437.
10. BLOOMFIELD, L. (1942). Linguistics and reading. Elementary English, 19, 125-130.
11. BOWER, T. G. R. (1970). Reading by eye. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies on reading (pp. 134-146), New York: Basic Books.
12. BRADSHAW, J. L., & NETTLETON, N. C. (1974). Articulatory interference and the mown-down heterophone effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 88-94.
13. CARRELLO, C., TURKEY, M. T., & LUKATELA, G. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 211-226). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14. CARR, T. H., & POLLATSEK, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research (Vol. 5, pp. 1-82). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15. COLTHEART, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). New York: Academic Press.
16. COLTHEART, M. (1980). Reading, phonological recoding, and deep dyslexia. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 197-226). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17. COLTHEART, M. (1985). In defense of dual-route models of reading. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 8, 709-710.
18. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. T., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. CORCORAN, D. W. J. (1966). An acoustic factor in letter cancellation. Nature, 210, 658.
20. DAVELAAR, E., COLTHEART, M., BESNER, D., & JONASSON, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 6, 391-402.
21. FELDMAN, L. B., & MOSKOVLJEVIC, J. (1987). Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 573-581.
22. FLEMING, K. K. (1993). Phonologically mediated priming in spoken and printed word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 272-284.
23. FORBACH, G. B., STANNERS, R. F., & HOCHHAUS, L. (1974). Repetition and practice effects in a lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 2, 337-339.
24. FORSTER, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257-287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
25. FORSTER, K. I. (1989). Basic issues in lexical processing. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 75-107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. FORSTER, K. I., & CHAMBERS, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
27. FOWLER, C. A., NAPPS, S. E., & FELDMAN, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13, 241-255.
28. FREDERIKSEN, J. R., & KROLL, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 363-379.
29. FRICK, R. W. (1995). Accepting the null hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 23, 132-138.
30. FRIEDMAN, R. B. (1995). Two types of phonological alexia. Cortex, 31, 397-403.
31. FRIEDMAN, R. B., & HADLEY, J. A. (1992). Letter by letter urface alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 185-208.
32. GIBSON, E. (1970). The ontogeny of reading. American Psychologist, 25, 136-143.
33. GLUSHKO, R. (1981). Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonology. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 61-84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. GOODMAN, K. S. (1969). Analysis of reading miscues: Applied psycholinguistics. Reading Research Quarterly, 5, 9-30.
35. GOUGH, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. K., Kavanaugh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. GRAINGER, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 228-244.
37. GRAINGER, J., O'REGAN, J. K., JACOBS, A. M., & SEGUI, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
38. GRAINGER, J., O'REGAN, J. K., JACOBS, A. M., & SECUI, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 49-56.
39. GRAINGER, J., & SEGUI, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.
40. GREEN, D. W., & SHALLICE, T. (1976). Direct visual access in reading for meaning. Memory & Cognition, 4, 753-758.
41. GROSSBERG, S., & STONE, G. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Priming, learning, and resonance. Psychological Review, 93, 46-74.
42. HANSEN, D., & RODGERS, T. S. (1968). An exploration of psycholinguistic units in initial reading. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.), The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process (pp. 42-86). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
43. HANSON, V. L., & WILKENFELD, D. (1985). Morphology and lexical organization in deaf readers. Language & Speech, 28, 269-279.
44. HILLINGER, M. L. (1980). Priming effects with phonemically similar words: The encoding-bias hypothesis reconsidered. Memory & Cognition, 8, 115-123.
45. HOWARD, D. (1991). Letter-by-letter readers: Evidence for parallel processing. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 34-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. HUEY, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. HUMPHREYS, G. W., EVETT, L. J., & TAYLOR, D. E. (1982). Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 576-590.
48. HUNTSMAN, L. A., & LIMA, S. D. (1996). Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 413-425.
49. HUSTON, A. M. (1992). Visual dyslexia. In A. M. Huston (Ed.), Understanding dyslexia: A practical approach for parents and teachers (pp. 47-65). Lanham, MD: Madison Books.
50. INHOFF, A. W., & TOPOLSKI, R. (1994). Use of phonological codes during eye fixations and in on-line delayed naming tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 689-713.
51. JARED, D., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358-394.
52. JORDAN, K., & HUNTSMAN, L. A. (1990). Image rotation of misoriented letter strings: Effects of orientation cuing and repetition. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 363-374.
53. JORDAN, K., & HUNTSMAN, L. A. (1995). Repetition of misoriented words reduces lexical-decision response times at repeated and novel orientations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 963-977.
54. KIRSNER, K., & DUNN, J. C. (1985). The perceptual record: A common factor in repetition priming and attribute retention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI( pp. 113-131). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. KIRSNER, K., DUNN, J. C., & STANDEN, P. (1987). Record-based word recognition. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 147-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. KOLERS, P. A. (1968). The recognition of geometrically transformed text. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 57-64.
57. KOLERS, P. A. (1970). Three stages of reading. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies on reading(pp. 90-118). New York: Basic Books.
58. KORIAT, A., & NORMAN, J. (1984). What is rotated in mental rotation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 421-434.
59. KORIAT, A., & NORMAN, J. (1985). Reading rotated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11. 490-508.
60. KORIAT, A., & NORMAN, J. (1989). Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 153-163.
61. KUCERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
62. LESCH, M. F., & POLLATSEK, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 285-294.
63. LIMA, S. D. (1987, May). Stem representation for prefixed words: Effects of compositionality of meaning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
64. LIMA, S. D., & INHOFF, A. W. (1985). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initial letter sequence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 272-285.
65. LUKATELA, G., LUKATELA, K., & TURVEY, M. T. (1993). Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access: TOWED primes FROG. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 461-466.
66. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1991). Phonological access of the lexicon: Evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 951-966.
67. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1993). Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 166-178.
68. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1994a). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
69. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from associative priming by homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
70. MARSHALL, J. C., & NEWCOMBE, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 175-199.
71. MARSHALL, J. C., & NEWCOMBE, F. (1980). The conceptual status of deep dyslexia: An historical perspective. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 1-21). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
72. MARTIN, R. C., & JENSEN, C. R. (1988). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: A failure to replicate. Memory & Cognition, 16, 505-521.
73. MASSARO, D. W., JONES, R. D., LIPSCOMB, D., & SCHOLZ, R. (1978). Role or prior knowledge on naming and lexical decisions with good and poor stimulus information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 498-512.
74. MASSON, M. E. J. (1986). Identification of typographically transformed words: Instance-based skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 479-488.
75. MASSON, M. E. J., & FREEDMAN, L. (1990). Fluent identification of repeated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 355-373.
76. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive actvation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
77. MCCUSKER, L. X., HILLINGER, M. L., & BIAS, R. G. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 217-245.
78. MEYER, D. E., & RUDDY, M. G. (1973, November). Lexical-memory retrieval bases on graphemic and phonemic representation of printed words. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
79. MEYER, D. E., SCHVANEVELDT, R. W., & RUDDY, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition. Memory & Cognition, 2, 309-321.
80. MEYER, D. E., SCHVANEVELDT, R. W., & RUDDY, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 1-27). New York: Academic Press.
81. MONSELL, S. (1985). Repetition and the lexicon. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 147-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. MONSELL, S. (1987). Non-visual orthographic processing and the orthographic lexicon. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 36-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
83. MORTON, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen models. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolsstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language (Vol. 1. pp. 259-268). New York: Plenum.
84. MURRELL, G. A., & MORTON, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 963-968.
85. NAPPS, S. (1985). Morphological, semantic, and formal relations among words and the organization of the mental lexicon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dartmouth College.
86. NAPPS, S., & FOWLER, C. A. (1987). The effect of orthography on the organization of the mental lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 252-257.
87. NAVON, D. (1978). Perception of misoriented words and letter strings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32, 129-140.
88. NORRIS, D., & BROWN, G. (1985). Race models and analogy theories: A dead heat? Cognition, 20, 155-168.
89. ORTON, S. T. (1925). Word-blindness in school children. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 14, 581-615.
90. PAAP, K. R., MCDONALD, J. E., SCHVANEVELDT, R. W., & NOEL, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 115-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. PAAP, K. R., NEWSOME, S. L., MCDONALD, J. E., & SCHVANHVELDT, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
92. RATCLIFF, R., HOCKLEY, W., & MCKOON, G. (1985). Components of activation: Repetition and priming effects in lexical decision and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 435-450.
93. RUBENSTEIN, H., GARFIELD, L., & MILLIKAN, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 487-494.
94. RUBENSTEIN, H., LEWIS, S. S., & RUBENSTEIN, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 10, 645-657.
95. RUMELHART, D. E., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
96. SCARBOROUGH, D. L., CORTESE, C., & SCARBOROUGH, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 1-17.
97. SCARBOROUGH, D. L., GERARD, L., & CORTESE, C. (1984). Independence of lexical access in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 84-89.
98. SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1-30.
99. SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1992). Beyond orthographic depth of reading: Equitable division of labor. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 85-118). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
100. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
101. SEIDENBERG, M. S., WATERS, G. S., BARNES, M., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
102. SHALLICE, T., & WARRINGTON, E. K. (1975). Word recognition in a phonemic dyslexic patient. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 187-199.
103. SHALLICE, T., & WARRINGTON, E. K. (1987). Single and multiple component central dyslexic syndromes. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 119-145). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
104. SMITH, F. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
105. SNODGRASS, J. G., & MINTZER, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Memory & Cognition, 21, 247-266.
106. SPOEHR, K., & SMITH, E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 71-89.
107. STANNERS, R. F., NEISER, J. J., HERNON, W. P., & HALL, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 399-412.
108. STANNERS, R. F., NEISER, J. J., & PAINTON, S. (1979). Memory representation for prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 733-743.
109. STANOVICH, K., & BAUER, D. W. (1978). Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 6, 410-415.
110. STERNBERG, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder's method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
111. VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
112. VAN ORDEN, G. C., JOHNSTON, J. C., & HALE, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 371-385.
113. VAN ORDEN, G. C., PENNINGTON, B. F., & STONE, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
114. WATERS, G. S., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & BRUCK, M. (1984). Children's and adults' use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory & Cognition, 12, 293-305.
115. WOFFINDIN, G. C. (1995). Psycholinguistic stimuli sorting program [Computer program]. Las Vegas: World Commerce Ltd.