The indirect McCollough effect: An examination of an associative account

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 1188-1196

  Humphrey, G Keith ^a   Herbert, Andrew M ^a   Hazlewood, Stephanie ^a   Stewart, Jeffrey A D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFTERIMAGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; VISION;

AFTERIMAGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 0032192858     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206168     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ALLAN, L. G., & SIEGHL, S. (1991). Characteristics of the indirect McCollough effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 249-257.
2. ALLAN, L. G., & SIEGEL, S. (1997). Contingent color aftereffects: Reassessing old conclusions. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 129-141.
3. ALLAN, L. G., SIEGEL, S., EISSENBERG, T., & THOMAS, S. E. (1997). More on the associative interpretation of the indirect McCollough effect. Quarterly Journal oj Experimental Psychology, 50B, 332-349.
4. AMBLER, B. A., & FOREIT, K. G. (1978). Induction of the McCollough effect II: Two different mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 466-470.
5. BROERSE, J., & GRIMBEEK, P. (1994). Eye movements and the associative basis of contingent color aftereffects: A comment on Siegel, Allan, and Eissenberg (1992). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 81-85.
6. BROERSE, J., & O'SHEA, R. P. (1995). Local and global factors in spatially-contingent coloured aftereffects. Vision Research, 35, 207-226.
7. DODWELL, P. C., & HUMPHREY, G. K. (1990). A functional theory of the McCollough effect. Psychological Review, 97, 78-89.
8. EISSENBERG, T., ALLAN, L. G., SIEGEL, S., & PETROV, N. (1995). An associative interpretation of the indirect McCollough effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 262-286.
9. ELLIS, S. R. (1977). Orientation selectivity of the McCollough effect: Analysis by equivalent contrast transformation. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 539-544.
10. GROSSBERG, S. (1980). How does the brain build a cognitive code? Psychological Review, 87, 1-51.
11. HANSEL, C. E. M., & MAHMUD, S. H. (1978). Comparable retention times for the negative colour afterimage and the McCollough effect. Vision Research, 18, 1601-1605.
12. HUMPHREY, G. K. (1998). The McCollough effect: Misperception and reality. In V. Walsh & J. Kulikowsi (Eds.). Perceptual constancy: Why things look as they do (pp. 31-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. HUMPHREY, G. K., DODWELL, P. C., & EMERSON, V. F. (1985). The roles of pattern orthogonality and color contrast in the generation of pattern-contingent color aftereffects. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 343-353.
14. HUMPHREY, G. K., DODWELL, P. C., & EMERSON, V. F. (1989). Pattern-contingent color aftereffects on noninduced patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 97-109.
15. HUMPHREY, G. K., HERBERT, A. M., SYMONS, L. A., & KARA, S. (1994). McCollough effect to form: A local phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 123, 86-90.
16. HUMPHREY, G. K., SKOWBO, D., SYMONS, L. A., HERBERT, A. M., & GRANT, C. L. (1994). Text-contingent color-aftereffects: A reexamination. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 405-413.
17. JAMESON, D., HURVICH, L. M., & VARNER, F. D. (1979). Receptoral and postreceptoral visual processes in recovery from chromatic adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 76, 3034-3038.
18. MACKAY, D. M., & MACKAY, V. (1977). Multiple orientation-contingent chromatic after-effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimented Psychology, 29, 203-218.
19. MAHMUD, S. H. (1987). Similar-orientation McCollough effect and the classical negative afterimage in a common adaptive process. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 455-457.
20. MCCOLLOUGH, C. (1965). Color adaptation of edge-detectors in the human visual system. Science, 149, 1115-1116.
21. MURCH, G. M., & HIRSH, J. (1972). The McCollough effect created by complementary afterimages. American Journal of Psychology, 85, 241-247.
22. SIEGEL, S., ALLAN, L. G., & EISSENBERG, T. (1992). The associative basis of contingent color aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 79-94.
23. SIEGEL, S., ALLAN, L. G., & EISSENBERG, T. (1994). Scanning and form-contingent color aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 91-94.
24. SKOWBO, D., TIMNEY, B. N., GENTRY, T. A., & MORANT, R. B. (1975). McCollough effects: Experimental findings and theoretical accounts. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 497-510.
25. STROMEYER, C. F., III (1969). Further studies of the McCollough effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 105-110.
26. STROMEYER, C. F., III (1972). Contour contingent color aftereffects: Retinal area specificity. American Journal of Psychology, 85, 227-235.
27. STROMEYER, C. F., III (1978). Form-color aftereffects in human vision. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, & H. L. Teuber (Eds.), Perception: Handbook of seasory physiology (Vol. 8. pp. 97-142). New York: Springer-Verlag.
28. STROMEYER, C. F., III, & DAWSON, B. M. (1978). Form-colour aftereffects: Selectivity to local luminance contrast. Perception, 7, 407-415.
29. WOLFE, J. M., & ROORDA, J. E. (1990). Long-term visual aftereffects: The by-products of error-correcting mechanisms? Unpublished manuscript.