Limitations of net CO2 uptake in plant species of a temperate dry loess grassland

Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 753-758

  Nagy, Zoltán ^a   Takács, Zoltán ^a   Szente, Kálmán ^a   Csintalan, Zsolt ^a   Lichtenthaler, Hartmut K ^b   Tuba, Zoltán ^a  

^a SZENT ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chlorophyll fluorescence; Drought; Limitation of photosynthesis; Stomata

Indexed keywords

BOTHRIOCHLOA ISCHAEMUM; EUPHORBIA PANNONICA; FESTUCA RUPICOLA; SALVIA NEMOROSA;

EID: 0032192286     PISSN: 09819428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0981-9428(98)80026-0     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 2 assimilation rates and different kinds of chlorophyll fluorescence ratios, J. Plant Physiol. 148 (1996) 555-566.
2. 2 concentration on rubisco activity, amount and photosynthesis in soybean leaves, Plant Physiol. 88 (1988) 1310-1316.
3. [3] De Lillis M., Poggiolini M., Ecophysiological adaptation to drought in different growth forms under Mediterranean climate, Ann. Bot. 48 (1990) 179-196.
4. [4] Farquhar G.D., Sharkey, T.D., Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33 (1982) 317-346.
5. [5] Govindjee, Sixty-three years since Kautsky: chlorophyll a fluorescence, Austr. J. Plant Physiol. 22 (1995) 131-140.
6. [6] Haitz M., Lichtenthaler H.K., The measurement of Rfd-values as plant vitality indices with the portable field fluorometer and the PAM fluorometer, in: Lichtenthaler H.K. (Ed.), Applications of Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 1988, pp. 249-254.
7. 2 assimilation and electron-transport in leaves, Photosynth. Res. 25 (1990) 213-224.
8. [8] Kautsky H., Franck U., XII. Zusammenfassung der bisherigen Ergebnisse und ihre Bedeutung für die Kohlensäureassimilation, Biochem. Z. 315 (1943) 207-232.
9. 4 grasses consequences of differences in stomatal conductance, Ecology 74 (1993) 113-123.
10. [10] Körner C., Shell S.A., Beur H., Maximum leaf diffusive conductance in vascular plants, Photosynthetica 13 (1979) 45-82.
11. [11] Krause G.H., Weis E., Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in plant physiology. II. Interpretation of fluorescence signals, Photosynth. Res. 5 (1983) 129-157.
12. [12] Kubiske M.E., Abrams M.D., Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis in 19 temperate tree species on contrasting sites during wet and dry years, Plant Cell Environ. 16 (1993) 1123-1129.
13. [13] Lichtenthaler H.K., Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence in stress physiology and remote sensing, in: Steven M., Clark J.A. (Eds.), Applications of Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Butterworths Scientific Ltd, London, 1990, pp. 287-305.
14. [14] Lichtenthaler H.K., The Kautsky effect: 60 years of chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics, Photosynthetica 27 (1992) 45-55.
15. [15] Lichtenthaler H.K., Miehé J.A., Fluorescence imaging as a diagnostic tool for plant stress, Trends Plant Sci. 2 (1997) 316-320.
16. [16] Lichtenthaler H.K., Rinderle U., The role of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics in detection of stress conditions in plants, CRC Critical Rev. Analyt. Chem. 19 (1988) 29-85.
17. [17] Martin B., Kebede H., Rilling C., Photosynthetic differences among Lycopersicon and Triticum aestivum, Crop Sci. 34 (1994) 113-118.
18. [18] Mooney H.A., Gordon M., Disturbance and Ecosystems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983, 292 p.
19. [19] Nagy Z., Tuba Z., Szente K., Uzvölgyi J., Fekete G., Photosynthesis and water use efficiency during degradation of a semiarid loess steppe, Photosynthetica 30 (1994) 307-311.
20. [20] Nobel P.S., Physicochemical and environmental plant physiology, Academic Press, London, San Diego, 1991, 635 p.
21. 2 and other gases inside leaves, New Phytol. 126 (1994) 449-479.
22. [22] Podani J., SYN-TAX-pc. Computer Programs for Multivariate Data Analysis in Ecology and Systematics, Version 5.0., Scientia Publishing, Budapest, 1993.
23. 2 assimilation, chlorophyll fluorescence and zeaxanthin accumulation in field-grown maple trees in the course of a sunny and a cloudy day, J. Plant Physiol. 148 (1996) 399-412.
24. [24] Schreiber U., Schliwa U., Bilger W., Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer, Photosynth. Res. 10 (1986) 51-62.
25. [25] Schreiber U., Hormann H., Neubauer C., Klughammer C., Asada K., Assessment of photosystem-II photochemical quantum yield by chlorophyll fluorescence quenching analysis, Austr. J. Plant Physiol. 22 (1995) 209-220.
26. [26] Schreiber U., Endo T., Mi H.L., Asada K., Allen J.F., Quenching analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence by the saturation pulse method - particular aspects relating to the study of eukaryotic algae and cyanobacteria, Plant Cell Physiol. 36 (1995) 873-882.
27. [27] Strasser R.J., Laser-induced fluorescence of plants and its application in environmental research, in: Proceedings International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS '86, Zürich, vol III, ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, 1986, pp. 1591-1594.
28. 2 assimilation in the desiccated poikilochloro-phyllous plant Xerophvta scabrida upon rehydration, Planta 192 (1994) 414-420.
29. [29] Zólyomi B., Natural vegetation of Budapest and its surroundings. Loess vegetation, in: Budapest Termeszeti Kepe. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1958, pp. 628-638 (in Hungarian).
30. [30] Zólyomi B., Fekete G., The Pannonian loess steppe: differentiation in space and time, Abst. Bot. 18 (1994) 29-41.