Patterns of uterine enhancement with helical CT

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 250-255

  Kaur, Harmeet ^a   Loyer, Evelyne M ^a   Minami, Manabu ^b   Charnsangavej, Chusilp ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cervix; Helical CT; Uterus

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; GYNECOLOGY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATIENT TREATMENT;

CERVIX; HELICAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; UTERUS;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MYOMETRIUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERUS CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; CERVIX UTERI; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; IOHEXOL; MIDDLE AGED; MYOMETRIUM; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UTERUS;

EID: 0032191307     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0720-048X(97)00173-3     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. [1] Ramsey EM. Anatomy of the human uterus. In: Chard T, Grudzinskas JG, editors. The Uterus. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994:18-40.
2. [2] Farrer-Brown G, Beilby JO, Tarbit MH. The blood supply of the uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common 1970;77:673-89.
3. [3] Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. Am J Roentgenol 1983;141:1119-28.
4. [4] Fleischer AC, Kalemeris GC, Machin JE, Entman SS, James AE Jr. Sonographic depiction of normal and abnormal endometrium with histopathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:445-52.
5. [5] Mitchell DG, Schonholz L, Hilpert PL, Pennel RG, Blum L, Rifkin MD. Zones of the uterus: discrepancy between US and MR images. Radiology 1990;174:827-31.
6. [6] Yamashita Y, Harada M, Sawada T, Takahashi M, Miyazaki H, Okamura H. Normal uterus and FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993;186:495-501.
7. [7] Hirano Y, Kubo K, Hirai Y, Okada S, Yamada K, Sawano S, Yamashita T, Hirasmatsu Y. Preliminary experience with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for uterine neoplasms. Radio Graphics 1992;12:243-56.
8. [8] Hricak H, Hamm B, Semelka RC, Cann Ce, Nauert T, Secaf E, Stern JL, Wolf K-J. Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopenetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Radiology 1991;181:95-106.
9. [9] Scoutt LM, McCauley TR, Flynn SD, Luthringer DJ, McCarthy SM. Zonal anatomy of the cervix: correlation of MR imaging and histologic examination of hysterectomy specimens. Radiology 1993;186:159-62.
10. [10] deSouza NM, Hawley IC, Schwieso JE, Gilderdale DJ, Soutter WP. The uterine cervix on in vitro and in vivo MR images: a study of zonal anatomy and vascularity using an enveloping cervical coil. Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:607-12.