Social aspects of the siting of facilities for hazardous waste management

Waste Management and Research

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 476-483

  Lidskog, Rolf ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Citizen involvement; Communicative planning; Dialogue; Environmental impact assessment; Hazardous waste management; Siting conflicts

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATIVE PLANNING; HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT;

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; HEALTH RISKS; PUBLIC RISKS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SITE SELECTION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

WASTE DISPOSAL;

DECISION MAKING; HAZARDOUS WASTE; LAND USE PLANNING; WASTE FACILITY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; GOVERNMENT; HAZARDOUS WASTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0032190695     PISSN: 0734242X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X9801600510     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderson, R. & Greenberg, M. (1982) Hazardous waste facility siting. A role for planners. APA Journal 48, 204-218.
2. Beck, U. (1995) Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
3. Berger, J. (1991) The Linguistification of the Sacred and the Delinguistification of the Economy. In: Honneth, A. & Joas, H. (eds) Communicative Action. Essays on Jurgen Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, pp. 165-180.
4. Bijker, W. E. (1992) The Social Construction of Fluorecent Lighting, Or How an Artifact Was Invented in Its Diffusion Stage. In: Bijker, W. E. & Law, J. (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, pp. 75-102.
5. Bingham, G. (1987) Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience. In: Lake, R. W. (ed.) Resolving Locational Conflicts. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research, pp. 314-323.
6. Bohm, K. (1985) Med-och motborgare i stadsplaneringen. En historia om medborgardeltagandets villkor (Proponents or opponents in town planning. A history of the conditions of citizen participation). Stockholm, Sweden: Liber Forlag.
7. Burkhart, R. (1993) Public Relations als Konfliktmanagement. Ein Konzept fur verstandigungsorienterte Offentlichkeitsarbeit. Untersucht am Beispiel der Planung von Sonderabfalleponien in Niederosterreich. Vienna, Austria: Bramuller.
8. Buzan, B. (1991) People, States and Fear. Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
9. Carpenter, S. & Kennedy, W. (1987) Environmental Conflict Management. In: Lake, R. W. (ed.) Resolving Locational Conflicts. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research, pp. 288-301.
10. Carter, L. J. (1987) Nuclear Imperatives and Public Trust. Dealing with Radioactive Waste. Washington, DC, USA: Resources for the Future.
11. Chen, K. & Mathes, J. C. (1989) Value-oriented Social Decision Analysis: A Communication Tool for Public Decision Making on Technological Projects, In: Vlek, C. & Cvetkovich (eds.) Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. pp. 111-132.
12. Crosby, N., Kelly, J. M. & Schaefer, P. (1986) Citizen Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation, Public Administration Review 46, 170-178.
13. Cutter, S. L. (1993) Living with Risk. The Geography of Technological Hazards. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
14. Dear, M. & Taylor, S. M. (1982) Not on Our Street: Community Attritudes to Mental Health. London, UK: Pion.
15. Dietz, T., Stern, P. C. & Rycroft, R. W. (1989) Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: The case of environmental risk. Sociological Forum 4, 47-70.
16. Dukes, E. E (1996) Resolving Public Conflict. Transforming Community and Governance. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
17. Dunlap, R. E. & Scarce, R. (1991) The polls-poll trends: environmental problems and protection. Public Opinion Quarterly 55, 651-672
18. EIA (1993) MKB. Underlag for beslut som tryggar miljon (EIA. Basis for decisions which protect the environment). Stockholm, Sweden: Riksantikvarieambetet, Statens naturvardsverk, Boverket.
19. Fiorino, D. J. (1990) Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values 15(2), 226-243.
20. Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
21. Forester, J. (1980) Critical Theory and Planning Practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 46, 275-286.
22. Foucault, M. (1970) The Order of Things. An Archeology of Medical Perception. New York, NY, USA: Random House.
23. Gusman, S. (1983) Selecting Participants for a Regulatory Negotiation, Environmental Impact Assessment Renew 4, 195-202.
24. Habermas, J. (1992) Further reflections on the public sphere and concluding remarks. In: C. Calhoun, (ed.) Hobermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT press, pp. 421-480.
25. Habermas, J. (1984) Theory of Communicative Action. Vol I. Reason and the of Rationalization of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
26. Kvarnbäck, M. (1996) Hur beskrivs konsekvenserna for miljon. En studie av miljokonsekvensbeskrivningar MKB? (How is the Consequences for the Environment Described? A Study of Environmental Impact Assessments). Karlskrona, Sweden: Boverket.
27. Lake, R. (1993) Rethinking NIMBY. Journal of the American Planning Association 59, 87-94.
28. Lake, R. (1994) Negotiating Local Autonomy. Political Geography 13, 423-442.
29. Lake, R. W. & Disch, L. (1992) Structural Constraints and Pluralist Contradictions in Hazardous Waste Regulation. Environment and Planning A 24, 663-681.
30. Langton. S. (ed.) (1978) Citizen Participation in America. Lexington, KY, USA: Lexington Books.
31. Lidskog, R. (1995) Konflikter via lokaliseringar. Dialogens villkor och granser (Conflicts with regard to sitings. The conditions and hound of dialogue) Stockholm: The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [report No. 4451].
32. Lidskog, R. (1994) Rodiooctive and Hazardous Waste Management in Sweden. Movements, Politics and Science. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell Int. [Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis Studia Sociologica Upsaliensa No. 38].
33. Lidskog, R. (1993) Whose Environment? Which Perspective. A Critical Approach to Hazardous Waste Management in Sweden. Environmental and Planning A 25, 571-588.
34. Lidskog, R. & Elander, I. (1992) Reinterpreting locational conflicts. NIMBY and nuclear waste management in Sweden, Policy and Politics 20 (4), 249-264.
35. Miller, T. (1988) Consulting Citizens in Sweden. Planning Participation in Context (report D 10: 1988). Stockholm, Sweden: BFR.
36. O'Hare, M. & Sanderson, R. (1987) Fair Compensation and the Boomtown Problem. In: Lake, R. W. (ed.) Resolving Locational Conflict. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research, pp. 376-407.
37. Openshaw, S. (1988) Making nuclear power more publicly acceptable. Nuclear Energy 27, 131-136.
38. O'Riordan, T., Kemp, R. & Purdue, M. (1988) Sizewell B. An Anatomy of the Inquiry. London, UK: Macmillan Press.
39. Petts, J. (1994) Effective Waste Management: Understanding and Dealing with Public Concerns. Waste Management and Research 12, 207-222.
40. Renn, O. (1991) Risikokommunikation: Bedingungen und Probleme eines rationalen Diskures uber die Akzeptabilitat von Risiken. In: Schneider, J. (ed) Risiko und Sicherheit Technischer Systeme. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser. pp. 193-210.
41. Renn, O. & Webler, T. (1992) Anticipating Conflicts: Public Participation in Managing the Solid Waste Crisis. Gaia. Ecological Perspectives in Science, Humanities and Economics 2, 84-94.
42. Richards, M. D. (1992) Siting Industrial Facilities Lessons from the Social Science Literature. Washington, DC, USA: US Council for Energy Awareness.
43. Roberts, J. A. (1991) MKB-Vad ar det? (Environmental Impact Assessment -What is that?) Karlskrona, Sweden: Boverket.
44. Sager, T. (1994) Communicative Planning Theory Aldershot, UK, Avebury.
45. SNV (1996) Deponoring av avfall. Forsalg till Allmanna rad (Disposal of Waste. Proposals to General recommendations). Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
46. Syme, G. J. & Eaton, E. (1989) Public Involvment as a Negotiation Process. Journal of Social Issues 45, 87-107.
47. Thurdin, G. (1993) Forord (Preface). In: Mealing om miljoeffekter av en fast forbindelse over Öresund (Mediation concerning the environmental impact of a bridge over Öresund). Miljøberedningen (Report 1993: 2, Stockholm, Sweden.
48. Weber, M. (1977) Vetenskap och politik (Science and Politics). Göteborg, Sweden: Bokforlaget Korpen.
49. Wikforss, O. (1984) Samrad i praktiken. Om medborgardeltagande i fysisk planering (Consultation in practice. On citizen participation in physical planning). Stockholm, Sweden: National Board for Building Research.
50. Wynne, B. (1994) Scientific knowledge and the global environment. In: Redclift, M. & Benton, T. (eds.) Social Theory and the Global Environment. London, UK: Routledge. pp. 169-189.