Left coronary pressure-flow relations of the beating and arrested rabbit heart at different ventricular volumes

Cardiovascular Research

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 88-95

  Sipkema, Pieter ^a   Takkenberg, Johanna J M ^a   Zeeuwe, Petra E M ^a   Westerhof, Nicolaas ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Barium contracture; Diastolic arrest; Isolated heart; KCl; Left ventricular pressure; Rabbit

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE; DIASTOLE; HEART ARREST; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC PRESSURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART VENTRICLE VOLUME; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTOLE;

ANIMALS; CORONARY CIRCULATION; DIASTOLE; HEART ARREST; MALE; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; PERFUSION; RABBITS; STROKE VOLUME; SYSTOLE; VENTRICULAR PRESSURE;

EID: 0032190587     PISSN: 00086363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6363(98)00119-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. [1] Bouma P, Sipkema P, Westerhof N. Coronary arterial inflow impediment during systole is little affected by capacitive effects. Am J Physiol 1993;264:H715-H721.
2. [2] Bouma P, Sipkema P, Westerhof N. Vasomotor tone affects diastolic coronary flow and flow impediment by cardiac contraction similarly. Am J Physiol 1994;266:H1944-H1950.
3. [3] Krams R, van Haelst ACTA, Sipkema P, et al. Can coronary systolic-diastolic flow differences be related to left ventricular pressure? A study in the isolated rabbit heart. Basic Res Cardiol 1989;84:149-159.
4. [4] Krams R, Sipkema P, Westerhof N. The varying elastance concept may explain coronary systolic flow impediment. Am J Physiol 1989;257:H1471-H1479.
5. [5] Krams R, Sipkema P, Westerhof N. Contractility is the main determinant of coronary systolic flow impediment. Am J Physiol 1989;257:H1936-H1944.
6. [6] Krams R, Sipkema P, Westerhof N. Coronary oscillatory flow amplitude is more affected by perfusion pressure than ventricular pressure. Am J Physiol 1990;258:H1889-H1898.
7. [7] Suga H, Sagawa K, Shoukas AA. Load independence of the instantaneous pressure-volume ratio of the canine left ventricle, and effects of epinephrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circ Res 1973;49:314-322.
8. [8] Suga H, Sagawa K. Instantaneous pressure-volume relationships and their ratio in the excised, supported canine left ventricle. Circ Res 1974;35:117-126.
9. [9] Vis MA, Sipkema P, Westerhof N. Modelling pressure-flow relations of cardiac muscle in diastole and systole. Am J Physiol 1997;272:H1516-H1526.
10. [10] Downey JM, Kirk ES. Inhibition of coronary flow by vascular waterfall mechanism. Circ Res 1975;36:753-763.
11. [11] Arts MGJ, Reneman RS. Interaction between intra myocardial pressure (IMP) and myocardial circulation. J Biomech Eng 1985;107:51-56.
12. [12] Spaan JAE, Breuls NPW, Laird JD. Forward coronary flow normally seen in systole is the result of both forward and concealed back flow. Basic Res Cardiol 1981;76:582-586.
13. [13] Spaan JAE, Breuls NPW, Laird JD. Diastolic-systolic coronary flow differences are caused by the intra myocardial pump action in the anesthesized dog. Circ Res 1981;49:584-593.
14. [14] Bellamy RF. Diastolic coronary artery pressure-flow relations in the dog. Circ Res 1978;43:92-101.
15. [15] Aversano T, Klocke FJ, Mates RE, et al. Preload induced alterations in capacitance free diastolic pressure-flow relationship. Am J Physiol 1984;246:H410-H417.
16. [16] Van Dijk LC, Krams R, Sipkema P, et al. Changes in coronary pressure-flow relation after transition from blood to Tyrode perfusion. Am J Physiol 1988;255:H476-H482.
17. [17] Gregg DE, Green HD. Registration and interpretation of normal phasic inflow into a left coronary artery by an improved differential manometric method. Am J Physiol 1940;130:114-125.
18. [18] Landaw EM, DiStefano JJ. Multiexponential, multicompartmental and noncompartmental modelling. II. Data analysis and statistical considerations. Am J Physiol 1984;246:R665-R677.
19. [19] Hak JB, van Beek JHGM, van Wijhe MH, et al. Influence of temperature on the response time of mitichondrial oxygen consumption in the isolated rabbit heart. J Physiol 1992;447:17-31.
20. [20] Shibata T, Berman MR, Hunter WC, et al. Metabolic and functional consequences of barium-induced contracture in rabbit myocardium. Am J Physiol 1990;259:H1566-H1574.
21. [21] Hak JB, van Beek JH, van Wijhe MH, et al. Influence of temperature on the response time of mitochondrial oxygen consumption in isolated rabbit heart. J Physiol 1992;447:17-31.
22. [22] Klocke FJ, Mates RE, Canty Jr. JM, et al. Coronary pressure-flow relationships. Controversial issues and probable implications. Circ Res 1985;56:310-323.
23. [23] Hanley FL, Messina MR, Grattan MT, et al. The effect of coronary inflow pressure on coronary vascular resistance in isolated dog heart. Circ Res 1984;54:760-772.
24. [24] Livingston JZ, Resar JR, Yin FCP. Effect of tetanic myocardial contraction on coronary pressure-flow relationships. Am J Physiol 1993;265:H1215-H1226.
25. [25] Livingston JZ, Halperin HR, Yin FCP. Accounting for the Gregg effect in tetanized coronary arterial pressure-flow relationships. Cardiovasc Res 1994;28:228-234.
26. [26] Feigl EO. Coronary physiology . Phys Rev 1983;63:13-18.
27. [27] Judd RM, Levy BI. Effects of barium-induced cardiac contraction on large-and small-vessel intra myocardial blood volume. Circ Res 1991;68:217-225.
28. [28] Munch DF, Comer HT, Downey JM. Barium contracture: a model for systole. Am J Physiol 1980;239:H438-H442.
29. 2 at different temperatures. J Vasc Res 1994;31(S1):47.
30. [30] Iwanaga S, Ewing SG, Hussini WK, et al. Changes in contractility and afterload have only slight effects on subendocardial systolic flow impediment. Am J Physiol 1995;269:H1202-1212.