Large magnetoresistance of single-crystal films of ferromagnetic SrRuO3

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials

Volumn 188, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 319-325

  Klein, L ^a   Marshall, A F ^b   Reiner, J W ^c   Ahn, C H ^d   Geballe, T H ^c   Beasley, M R ^b,c   Kapitulnik, A ^c  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Domain wall resistivity; Itinerant ferromagnetism; Magnetoresistance; Ruthenates; Scaling

Indexed keywords

FERROMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC DOMAINS; MAGNETIC FILMS; MAGNETORESISTANCE; SINGLE CRYSTALS; STRONTIUM COMPOUNDS;

RUTHENATES; SCALING FUNCTIONS;

FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS;

EID: 0032187899     PISSN: 03048853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00201-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. See, e.g., C. Herring, in: G.T. Rado, H. Suhl (Eds.), Magnetism, vol. IV, Academic Press, New York, 1966.
2. P.B. Allen et al., Phys. Rev. B 53 (1996) 4393.
3. V.J. Emery, S.A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 3253.
4. L. Klein et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2774.
5. C.H. Ahn, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1996.
6. L. Klein et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 (1996) 10111.
7. S.C. Gausepohl et al., Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995) 3459; J.H. Cho, Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 37.
8. S.C. Gausepohl et al., Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995) 3459; J.H. Cho, Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 37.
9. G. Cao et al., submitted.
10. N. Furukawa, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 63 (1995) 3214.
11. A. Urushibara et al., Phys. Rev. B 51 (1995) 14103.
12. R.J. Weiss, A.S. Marotta, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 9 (1959) 302.
13. I. Balberg, J.S. Helman, Phys. Rev. B 18 (1978) 303.
14. H.H. Potter, Phil. Magn. 13 (7) (1932) 233.
15. D.S. Simons, M.B. Salamon, Phys. Rev. B 10 (1974) 4680.
16. S. Yamaguchi et al., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 64 (1995) 1885.
17. See, e.g., T.R. McGuire, R.I. Potter, IEEE Trans. Magn. 11 (1975) 1018.
18. c together with the scaling of the MR give further evidence that the MR is related to M and not B.
19. In fact, the magnetocrystalline anisotropy prevents full orientation of M along H at low temperatures. Therefore, the measured AMR of ∼20% is only a lower bound.
20. I.A. Campbell, A. Fert, O. Jaoul, J. Phys. C 3 (Met. Phys. Suppl.) (1970) S95; O. Jaoul, I.A. Campbell, A. Fert, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 5 (1977) 23.
21. I.A. Campbell, A. Fert, O. Jaoul, J. Phys. C 3 (Met. Phys. Suppl.) (1970) S95; O. Jaoul, I.A. Campbell, A. Fert, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 5 (1977) 23.
22. J.N. Eckstein et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69 (1996) 1312.
23. D.J. Singh, J. Appl. Phys. 79 (1996) 4818.
24. W.E. Pickett, D.J. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 53 (1996) 1146.
25. c and lower; therefore, we expect the same structure at 5 K.
26. J.F. Gregg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1580.
27. H.Y. Hwang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2041.
28. Y. Maeno et al., Nature (London) 372 (1994) 532; G. Cao, S. McCall, J.E. Crow, Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) R672; G. Cao, S. McCall, J.E. Crow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 1751.
29. Y. Maeno et al., Nature (London) 372 (1994) 532; G. Cao, S. McCall, J.E. Crow, Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) R672; G. Cao, S. McCall, J.E. Crow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 1751.
30. Y. Maeno et al., Nature (London) 372 (1994) 532; G. Cao, S. McCall, J.E. Crow, Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) R672; G. Cao, S. McCall, J.E. Crow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 1751.