Constrained games, intervening duality and experimenter-experiment interactions

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 110, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 326-341

  Ryan, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Constrained games; Intervening duality

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; GAME THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CONSTRAINED GAMES; INTERVENING DUALITY;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0032187015     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)80007-6     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Charnes, A., 1953. Constrained games and linear programming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pp. 294-320.
2. Edwards, W., 1992. Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
3. Fishburn, P.C., 1964. Decision and value theory, ORSA Publications in Operations Research, vol 10, Wiley, New York.
4. Howard, R.A., 1992. In Praise of the Old Time Religion, in Edwards, 1992.
5. Hey, J. (Ed.), 1993. Current Issues in Microeconomics, Macmillan, New York.
6. Johnson, E.J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., Kunreuther, H., 1993. Framing, probability distortions and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 35-51.
7. Machina, M.J., 1993. Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Resolved and Unresolved. In: Hey (Ed.), 1993.
8. Owen, G., 1982. Game Theory, Academic Press, New York.
9. Ryan, M.J., 1994. Constrained gaming approaches to production decision making under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 77, 70-81.
10. Ryan, M.J., 1995. Purposive contradiction, intervening duality and the nature of probability. European Journal of Operational Research 86, 366-373.
11. Ryan, M.J., 1996. Constrained gaming approaches to representations and resolutions of Allais' paradoxes. Hull Economic Research Report 236, Presented at the 10th Italian Congress on Game Theory, Bergamo.
12. Starmer, C., Sugden, R., 1993. Testing for juxtaposition and event splitting effects. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6, 235-254.
13. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1983. Existensional vs intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgement. Psychological Review 91, 293-315.
14. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59, 251-278.