Science ethics: A study of eminent scientists' professional values

Scientometrics

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 269-298

  Prpić, Katarina ^a  

^a Institute for Social Research Zagreb   (Croatia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CROATIA; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERSONNEL; RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOLOGY;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ATTITUDE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CROATIA; DATA COLLECTION; ETHICS; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENCE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIAL SCIENCES; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0032173712     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02458411     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. S. HEMLIN, H. MONTGOMERY, Scientists' Conceptions of Scientific Quality: An Interview Study, Science Studies, 3 (1990) 73-81.
2. S. COLE, Making Science: Between Nature and Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge/London, 1992.
3. S. HEMLIN, Scientific Quality in the Eyes of the Scientists. A Questionnaire Study, Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 3-18.
4. G. SONNERT, What Makes a Good Scientist?: Determinants of Peer Evaluation among Biologists, Social Studies of Science, 25 (1995) 35-55.
5. T. LUUKKONEN, The Impacts of Research Field Evaluations on Research Practice, Research Policy, 24 (1995) 349-365.
6. W. R. SHADISH, D. TOLLIVER, M. GRAY, S. SEN GUPTA, Author Judgements about Works They Cite: Three Studies from Psychology Journals, Social Studies of Science, 24 (1995) 477-498.
7. K. BUCHHOLZ, Criteria for the Analysis of Scientific Quality, Scientometrics, 32 (1995) 195-218.
8. L. B. SECHREST, Approaches to Ensuring Quality of Data and Performance: Lessons for Science, in: D. N. JACKSON and J. P. RUSHTON (Eds), Scientific Excellence: Origins and Assessment, Sage, Newbury Park/Beverli Hills/London/New Delhi, 1987, pp 253-283.
9. A. MAZUR, Allegation of Dishonesty in Research and Their Treatment by American Universities, Minerva, 27 (1989) 177-194.
10. E. G. SHORE, Effectiveness of Research Guidelines in Prevention of Scientific Misconduct, Science and Engineering Ethics, 1 (1995) 383-387.
11. R. K. MERTON, The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1974.
12. H. ZUCKERMAN, Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States, The Free Press & Collier Macmillan Publishers, New York/London, 1977.
13. J. R. COLE, S. COLE, Social Stratification in Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1981.
14. H. M. COLLINS, Knowledge, Norms and Rules in the Sociology of Science, Social Studies of Science, 12 (1982) 299-309.
15. D. E. CHUBIN, S. RESTIVO, The 'Mooting' of Science Studies: Research Programmes and Science Policy, in: K. D. KNORR-CETINA and M. MULKAY (Eds), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, Sage, London/Beverly Hills/New Delhi, 1983, pp 53-83.
16. S. FUCHS, The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1992.
17. K. PRPIĆ, Socio-kognitivni pristup profesionalnoj etici znanstvenika (Socio-Cognitive Approach to Scientists' Professional Ethics), in: K. PRPIĆ et al. (Eds), Sociološki ogledi. Zbornik radova uz 30. obljetnicu Instituta za društvena istraživanja Sveučilišta u Zagrebu (Sociological Insights: Collected Papers on the Occasion of the 30th Anniversary of the Institute for Social Reseaerch - Zagreb University), Institut za društvena istraživanja - Zagreb, Zagreb, 1994, pp 71-87.
18. R. D. WHITLEY, The Sociology of Scientific Work and the History of Scientific Developments, in: S. S. BLUME (Ed.), Perspectives in the Sociology of Science, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester/New York/Brisbane/Toronto, 1977, pp 21-50.
19. R. WHITLEY, The Context of Scientific Investigation, in: K. D. KNORR, R. KROHN, R. WHITLEY (Eds), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht/Boston/ London, 1981, pp 297-321.
20. R. WHITLEY, The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.
21. K. PRPIČ, Profesionalna etika znanstvenika (Scientists' Professional Ethics), Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu, Zagreb, 1997.
22. Ž. ŠPORER, Sociologija profesija: ogled o društvenoj uvjetovanosti profesionalizacije (The Sociology of Professions: Essay on Social Determination of Professionalisation). Sociološko društvo Hrvatske, Zagreb, 1990.
23. U. SEGERSTRÅLE, Anti-Antiscience: The Fight for Science and Reason, Science Studies, 9 (1996) 5-25.
24. H. H. BAUER, The Anti-Science Phenomenon in Science & Technology Studies, Science Studies, 9 (1996) 34-49.
25. S. FUCHS, The Poverty of Postmodernism, Science Studies, 9 (1996) 58-66.
26. Y. ELKANA, Two-Tier-Thinking: Philosophical Realism and Historical Relativism, Social Studies of Science, 8 (1978) 309-326.
27. J. M. CHASE, Normative Criteria for Scientific Publication, American Sociologist, 25 (1970) 262-265.
28. S. HEMLIN, H. MONTGOMERY, Peer Judgements of Scientific Quality: A Cross-Disciplinary Document Analysis of Professorship Candidates, Science Studies, 6 (1993) 19-27.
29. S. LELAS, Promišljanje znanosti (Contemplating Science), Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo, Zagreb, 1990.
30. S. FUCHS, A Sociological Theory of Objectivity, Science Studies, 11 (1997) 4-26.
31. M. J. MAHONEY, Psychology of the Scientists: An Evaluative Review, Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 349-375.
32. C. KERR, The Academic Ethic and University achers: A "Disintegrating Profession"? Minerva, 27 (1989) 139-156.
33. S. C. HILL, Questioning the Influence of a 'Social System of Science': a Study of Australian Scientists, Science Studies, 4 (1974) 135-163.
34. L. H. KERN, H. L. MIRELS, V. G. HINSHAW, Scientists' Understanding of Propositional Logic: An Experimental Investigation, Social Studies of Science, 13 (1983) 131-146.
35. D. ŠUŠNJIĆ, Znati i verovati. Teorijske orijentacije u proučavanju religije i ateizma (To Know and to Believe. Theoretical Orientations in the Studies of Religion and Atheism), Kršćanska sadašnjost/Stvarnost, Zagreb, 1988.
36. W. O. HAGSTROM, The Scientific Community, Basic Books, Inc., New York/London, 1965.
37. J. P. SWAZEY, M. S. ANDERSON, K. SEASHORE LEWIS, Ethical Problems in Academic Research, American Scientist, 81 (1993) 542-553.
38. T. L. BEAUCHAMP, Načela u bioetici (Priciples in Bioethics), Društvena Istraživanja (Social Research), 5 (1996) 533-544.
39. A. ELZINGA, The consequences of evaluation for academic research, Science Studies, 1 (1988) 5-14.
40. D. NELKIN, Scientists and Professional Responsibility: The Experience of American Ecologists, Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 79-95.
41. J. BRONOWSKI, Osjećaj budućnosti: Eseji iz filozofije znanosti (A Sense of the Future. Essays in Natural Philosophy), Globus, Zagreb, 1980.
42. N. SESARDIĆ, Iz analitičke perspektive: ogledi o filozofiji, znanosti i politici, (From the Analytical Perspective: Essays on Philosophy, Science and Politics), Sociološko društvo Hrvatske, Zagreb, 1991.
43. F. MALETIĆ, FRANJO (Ed.), Tkoje tko u Hrvatskoj = Who is who in Croatia, Golden marketing, Zagreb, 1993.
44. K. PRPIĆ, Characteristics and Determinants of Eminent Scientists' Productivity, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 185-206.
45. K. PRPIĆ, Scientific Fields and Eminent Scientists' Productivity Patterns and Factors, Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 445-471.
46. B. GOLUB, Croatian Scientists' Drain and its Roots, International Migration, 34 (1996) 609-625.
47. B. GOLUB, Socioprofesionalni profil znanstveničke elite (Socio-Professional Profile of the Scientific Elite), in: B. GOLUB, B. KRIŠTOFIĆ, D. ČENGIĆ, Znanstvene i privredne elite (Scientific and Managerial Elites) Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu, Zagreb, 1997, pp 9-40.
48. M. ROCHE, Y. FREITES, Rise and Twilight of the Venezuelan Scientific Community, Scientometrics, (1992) 267-289.
49. S. P. NICHOLS, W. F. WELDON, Professional Responsibility: The Role of the Engineer in Society, Science and Engineering Ethics, 3 (1997) 327-337.
50. M. DAVIS, An Historical Preface to Engineering Ethics, Science and Engineering Ethics, 1 (1995) 33-48.
51. U. SEGERSTRÅLE, Good to the Last Drop? Millikan Stories as "Canned" Pedagogy, Science and Engineering Ethics, 1 (1995) 197-214.
52. J. ŽUPANOV, Poslije potopa (After the Deluge), Globus, Zagreb, 1995.
53. M. S. FRANKEL, J. CAVE, Introduction, in: M. S. FRANKEL, J. CAVE (Eds), Evaluating Science and Scientists: An East-West Dialogue on Research Evaluation in Post-Communist Europe, Central European University Press, Budapest, 1997, pp 1-6.
54. A. ŁOMNICKI, A Polish Perspective on Peer Rewiev, in: M. S. FRANKEL, J. CAVE (Eds), Evaluating Science and Scientists: An East-West Dialogue on Research Evaluation in Post-Communist Europe, Central European University Press, Budapest, 1997, pp 61-70.