Charpy specimen - A simply supported beam or a constrained free-free beam?

Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Volumn 61, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 369-386

  Marur, P R ^a  

^a INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION   (India)

Author keywords

Cracked Timoshenko beam; Dynamic stress intensity factor; Finite elements; Impact testing; Mass spring model; Numerical simulation

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BEAMS AND GIRDERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; CRACKS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMPACT TESTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRESS INTENSITY FACTORS;

MASS-SPRING MODEL; TIMOSHENKO BEAMS;

FRACTURE MECHANICS;

BEAM;

EID: 0032172801     PISSN: 00137944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(98)00064-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bohme W., Kalthoff J.F. The behavior of notched bend specimen in impact testing. International Journal of Fracture. 20:1982;R139-R143.
2. Kao HR. The dynamic behavior of an impact loaded 3-point bend specimen with a crack. Lund University of Technology, Sweden, 1990.
3. Marur P.R., Simha K.R.Y., Nair P.S. A compact testing system for dynamic fracture studies. Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 23:1995;267-274.
4. Kishimoto K., Aoki S., Sakata M. Simple formula for dynamic stress intensity factor of pre-cracked Charpy specimen. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 13:1980;501-508.
5. Williams J.G. The analysis of dynamic fracture using lumped mass-spring models. International Journal of Fracture. 33:1987;47-59.
6. Marur P.R., Simha K.R.Y., Nair P.S. Dynamic analysis of three point bend specimens under impact. International Journal of Fracture. 68:1994;261-273.
7. Bacon C., Farm J., Lataillade J.L. Dynamic fracture toughness determined by load-point displacement. Experimental Mechanics. 34:1994;217-223.
8. Gopalarathnam V.S., Shah S.P., John R. A modified instrumented Charpy test for cement-based composites. Experimental Mechanics. 24:1984;102-111.
9. Miyazaki N. Application of line-spring model to dynamic stress intensity factor analysis of precracked bending specimen. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 38:1991;321-326.
10. Sahraoui S., Gillaizeau F. Numerical simulation of the Charpy impact testing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 33:1989;871-876.
11. Marur P.R., Nair P.S., Simha K.R.Y. Two degrees of freedom modeling of precracked beams under impact. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 53:1996;481-491.
12. Marur P.R., Simha K.R.Y., Nair P.S. Influence of anvil supports and overhangs in dynamic analysis of three point bend testing. International Journal of Fracture. 69:1994/1995;R59-R62.
13. Rokach I.V. Numerical modeling of experiments for determining the dynamic crack resistance of materials. Strength of Materials. 24:1992;450-453.
14. Marur P.R. Numerical simulation of anvil interaction in the impact testing of notched bend specimens. International Journal of Fracture. 81:1996;27-37.
15. Jacobsen LS, Ayre RS. Engineering vibration. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1958. p. 498.
16. Marur PR. Eigen-analysis of edge-cracked free-free Timoshenko beam. Mechanics Research Communications 1998, in print.
17. Kishimoto K., Fujino Y., Aoki S., Sakata M. A simple formula for the dynamic stress intensity factor of an impacted freely-supported bend specimen. JSME International Journal. 33:1990;51-56. Series I.
18. Marur P.R. On the effects of higher vibration modes in the analysis of three point bend testing. International Journal of Fracture. 77:1996;67-79.