Obligate mutualism between Trollius europaeus and its seed-parasite pollinators Chiastocheta flies in the Alps

Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences - Serie III

Volumn 321, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 789-796

  Jaeger, Nicolas ^a   Després, Laurence ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

Author keywords

Chiastocheta; Mutualism; Pollination; Self incompatibility; Trollius europaeus; Visitation rates

Indexed keywords

MUTUALISM; PARASITE; POLLINATOR; SEED PREDATION;

ALTITUDE; ARTICLE; FERTILIZATION; FLY; FRANCE; NONHUMAN; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; PREDATOR; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES;

ALPS; FRANCE;

ANTHOMYIIDAE; CHIASTOCHETA; HYMENOPTERA; RANUNCULACEAE; TROLLIUS EUROPAEUS;

EID: 0032172501     PISSN: 07644469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0764-4469(98)80019-X     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. [1] Janzen D.H., How to be a fig?, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10 (1979) 13-51.
2. [2] Bronstein J.L., Seed predators as mutualists: ecology and evolution of the fig/pollinator interaction, in: Bernays E. (ed.), Insect-Plant Interactions (Vol. IV), CRC Press, 1992, pp. 1-44.
3. [3] Anstett M.C., Hossaert-McKey M., Kjellberg F., Figs and fig pollinators: evolutionary conflicts in a coevolved mutualism, Trends Ecol. Evol. 12 (1996) 94-99.
4. [4] Addicott J.F., Variation in the costs and benefits of mutualism: the interaction between yuccas and yucca moths, Oecologia 70 (1986) 486-494.
5. [5] Pellmyr O., Thompson J.N., Brown J.M., Harrison R.G., Evolution of pollination and mutualism in the yucca moth lineage, Am. Nat. 148 (1996) 827-847.
6. [6] Pellmyr O., The cost of mutualism: interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasites, Oecologia 78 (1989) 53-59.
7. [7] Dodd R.J., Linhart Y.B., Reproductive consequences of interactions between Yucca glauca (Agavaceae) and Tegeticula yuccasella (Lepidoptera) in Colorado, Am. J. Bot. 81 (1994) 815-825.
8. [8] Pellmyr O., The phylogeny of a mutualism: evolution and coadaptation between Trollius and its seed parasitic pollinators, Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 47 (1992) 337-365.
9. [9] Hagerup O., Peterson V., Botanisk Atlas, Munkegaard, Copenhagen, 1956, p. 230.
10. [10] Berry P.E., Calvo R.N., Wind-pollination, self-incompatibility and altitudinal shifts in pollination systems in the high Andean genus Espletia (Asteraceae), Am. J. Bot. 76 (1989) 1602-1614.
11. [11] Schoen D.J., Brown H.D., Whole and within-flower self-pollination in Glycine argyrea and G. clandestina and the evolution of autogamy, Evolution 45 (1991) 1651-1665.
12. [12] Tutin T.G., Flora Europaea, University Press, Cambridge, 1964, p. 210.
13. [13] Arroyo M.T.K., Armesto J.J., Primack R.B., Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile. II. Effect of temperature on visitation rates and pollination possibilities, Pl. Syst. Evol. 149 (1985) 187-203.
14. [14] Warren S.D., Harper K.T., Booth G.M., Elevational distribution of insect pollinators, Am. Midl. Nat. 120 (1988) 325-330.
15. [15] Bingham R.A., Efficient pollination of alpine plants, Nature 391 (1998) 238-239.
16. [16] Doroszewska A., The genus Trollius - a taxonomical study, Monographiae Botanicae 41 (1974) 1-167.
17. [17] Col in J.E., The genus Chiastocheta Pokorny (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), Proc. Royal Entomol. Soc. London (B) 23 (1954) 95-102.
18. [18] Hennig W., Anthomyiidae, in Lindner E. (ed.), Die Fliegen der Palaearktischen Region, 1976, pp. 329-376.
19. [19] Michelsen V., A revision of the Anthomyiidae (Diptera) described by J.W. Zetterstedt, Steenstrupia 11 (1985) 37-65.
20. [20] Atlan A., Gouyon P.H., Fournial T., Pomente D., Couvet, D., Sex allocation in a hermaphroditic plant: the case of gynodioecy in Thymus vulgaris L., J. Evol. Biol. 5 (1992) 183-203.
21. [21] Lloyd D.G., Schoen D.J., Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions, Int. J. Plant Sci. 153 (1992) 358-369.
22. [22] Cruden R.W., Pollen-ovule ratios: A conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants, Evolution 31 (1977) 32-46.
23. [23] Douglas K.L., Cruden R.W., The reproductive biology of Anemone canadensis (Ranunculaceae): breeding system and facilitation of sexual selection, Am. J. Bot. 81 (1994) 314-321.
24. [24] Bierzychudek P., Pollinator limitation of plant reproductive effort, Am. Nat 117 (1981) 838-840.
25. [25] Wiens D., Calvin C.L., Wilson C.A., Davern C.I., Frank D., Seavey S.R., Reproductive success, spontaneous embryo abortion and genetic load in flowering plants, Oecologia 71 (1987) 501-509.
26. [26] Charlesworth D., Why do plants product so many more ovules than seeds?, Nature 338 (1989) 21-22.
27. [27] Scribailo R.W., Barrett S.C.H., Effects of prior self-pollination on out-crossed seed set in tristylous Pontederia sagittata (Pontederiaceae), Sex. Plant Reprod. 7 (1994) 273-281.
28. [28] Yumoto T., The ecological pollination syndromes of insect-pollinated plants in an alpine meadow, Ecol. Res. 1 (1986) 83-95.
29. [29] McCall C., Primack R.B., Influence of flower characteristics, weather, time of day and season on insect visitation rates in three plant communities, Am. J. Bol. 79 (1992) 434-442.
30. [30] Arroyo M.T.K., Primack R., Armesto J., Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile. I. Pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation, Am. J. Bot. 69 (1982) 82-97.
31. [31] Totland O., Influence of climate, time of day and season, and flower density on insect flower visitation in alpine Norway, Arctic and Alpine Research 26 (1994) 66-71.
32. [32] Husband B.C, Barrett S.C.H., Pollinator visitation in population of tristylous Eichornia paniculata in northeastern Brazil, Oecologia 89 (1992) 365-371.
33. [33] Robertson A.W., Lloyd D.G., Rates of pollen deposition and removal in Myosotis colensoi, Funct. Ecol. 7 (1993) 549-559.
34. [34] Devlin B., Stephenson A.G., Factors that influence the duration of the staminate and pistillate phases of Lobelia cardinalis flowers, Bot. Gaz, 145 (1984) 323-328.
35. [35] Richardson T.E., Stephenson A.G., Pollen removal and pollen deposition affect the duration of the staminate and pistillate phases in Campanula rapunculoides, Am. J. Bot. 76 (1989) 532-538.
36. [36] Khadari B., Giberneau M., Anstett M.C., Kjellberg F., Hossaert-McKey M., When figs wait for pollinators: the length of fig receptivity, Am. J. Bot. 82 (1995) 992-999.
37. [37] Primack R.B., Longevity of individual flowers, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16 (1985) 15-37.