Economic impacts of highway infrastructure improvements part 1. Conceptual framework

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 203-210

  Kanaroglou, Pavlos S ^a   Anderson, William P ^a   Kazakov, Aleksandr ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Ministry of Transportation of Ontario   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ROAD TRANSPORT; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE;

CANADA;

EID: 0032172035     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(98)00012-X     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Andersen, S. J., Mahmassani, H. S., Walton, C. M., Euritt, M. A. and Harrison, R. (1992) Traffic and spatial impacts and the classification of small highway-bypassed cities. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
2. Buffington, J. L. and Burke, D. (1989) Employment and income impacts of highway expenditures on bypass, loop and radial highway improvements. Texas Transportation Institute, A&M University System, College Station, TX.
3. Fothergill, E. J. (1977) The impact of highway bypasses on business activities in small towns. Thesis for the degree of Master of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont., Canada.
4. Helaakoski, R. (1991) Economic effects of highway bypasses on business activities in small cities. Thesis for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
5. Highlands and Islands Development Board (1979) The economic effects of bypasses on local business. Highlands and Islands Development Board. Inverness.
6. Hirschman, I. and Henderson, M. (1990) Methodology for assessing local land use impacts of highways. Transportation Research Record 1274.
7. Horwood, E. M., Zellner, C. A. and Ludwig, R. L. (1965) Community consequences of highway improvements. National Cooperative Highway Research Report 18. Highway Research Board, Washington. DC.
8. Iowa Department of Transportation (1989) A literature review of urban bypass studies. Office of Project Planning, Iowa Department of Transportation, Iowa.
9. Kanaroglou, P. S. and Woudsma, C. G. (1994) Regulatory reform and the structure of for-hire motor carrier revenues in Ontario: 1987-1989. Geographical Analysis 23(3), 246-260.
10. Kanaroglou, P. S., Anderson, W. P. and Kazakov, A. (1995) Assessing the economic impacts of bypasses on small communities in Ontario, ECN-95-01. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Technical Publications, Room 320, Central Building, 1201 Wilson Avenue, Downsview, Ont. M3M 1J8, Canada.
11. Kanaroglou, P. S., Anderson, W. P. and Kazakov, A. (1996) Economic impacts of highway infrastructure improvements: operationalization with application to communities in Ontario. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Geography, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada.
12. Miller, R. and Blair, P. (1985) Input-output Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. Perera, M. H. (1990) Framework for classifying and evaluating economic impacts caused by a transportation improvement. Transportation Research Record 1274.
14. Seskin, S. N. (1990) Comprehensive framework for highway economic impact assessment: methods and results. Transportation Research Record 1274.
15. Stephanedes, Y. J. and Eagle, D. M. (1986) Time-series analysis of interactions between transportation and manufacturing and retail employment. Transportation Research Record 1074.
16. Whitehurst, C. H. (1965) The road around: a study of the economic impact of highway by-passes on rural south Carolina cities and towns. Clemson College, South Carolina.
17. Winfrey, R. (1969) Economic Analysis for Highways. International Textbook Company, Scranton, Pennsylvania.
18. Woudsma, C. G. and Kanaroglou, P. S. (1994) Deregulation of the motor carrier industry: a Canadian example. Environment and Planning A 26, 343-360.
19. Woudsma, C. G. and Kanaroglou, P. S. (1995) Motor carrier policy evolution and rate issues in Ontario, 1983-91. Journal of Transport Geography 3(2), 117-126.