Simulating spatial and temporal context of forest management using hypothetical landscapes

Environmental Management

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 777-787

  Gustafson, Eric J ^a   Crow, Thomas R ^a  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Forest edge; Forest interior; Historical context; Landscape pattern; Simulation modeling; Spatial context; Timber harvest

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT;

ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REMOTE SENSING;

LOGGING (FORESTRY);

FOREST MANAGEMENT; GIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FOREST; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LANDSCAPING; MODEL; REMOTE SENSING; SIMULATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TIME PERCEPTION; WOOD;

EID: 0032171702     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002679900147     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Andren, H., and P. Angelstam. 1988. Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands: experimental evidence. Ecology 69:544-547.
2. Behan, R. W. 1990. Multiresource forest management: A paradigmatic challenge to professional forestry. Journal of Forestry 88:12-18.
3. Brunson, M. W., and D. K. Reiter. 1996. Effects of ecological information on judgments about scenic impacts of timber harvest. Journal of Environmental Management 46:31-41.
4. Cox, E. S., and J. Sullivan. 1995. Harvest scheduling with spatial wildlife constraints: An empirical examination of tradeoffs. Journal of Environmental Management 43:333-348.
5. Crow, T. R. 1991. Landscape ecology: the big picture approach to resource management. Pages 55-65 in D. J. Decker, M. E. Krasny, G. R. Goff, C. R. Smith, and D. W. Gross (eds.), Challenges in the Conservation of Biological Resources. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
6. Crow, T. R., and E. Gustafson. 1996. Ecosystem management: managing natural resources in time and space. Pages 424-450 in K. A. Kohm and J. F. Franklin (eds.), Creating a forestry for the twenty-first century. Island Press, Washington, DC.
7. Davis, J. C. 1986. Statistics and data analysis in geology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. DellaSalla, D. A., and D. L. Rabe. 1987. Response of least flycatchers Empidonax minimus to forest disturbances. Biological Conservation 41:291-299.
9. Duerr, W. A., D. E. Teeguarden, N. B. Christiansen, and S. Guttenberg (eds.). 1979. Forest resource management: Decision-making principles and cases. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 612 pp.
10. Franklin, J. F., and R. T. T. Forman. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology 1:5-18.
11. Gustafson, E. J. 1996. Expanding the scale of forest management: Allocating timber harvests in time and space. Forest Ecology and Management 87:27-39.
12. Gustafson, E. J., and T. R. Crow. 1994. Modeling the effects of forest harvesting on landscape structure and the spatial distribution of cowbird brood parasitism. Landscape Ecology 9:237-248.
13. Gustafson, E. J., and T. R. Crow. 1996. Simulating the effects of alternative forest management strategies on landscape structure. Journal of Environmental Management 46:77-94.
14. Litvaitis, J. A. 1993. Response of early successional vertebrates to historic changes in land use. Conservation Biology 7:866-873.
15. Mladenoff, D. J., M. A. White, T. R. Crow, and J. Pastor. 1994. Applying principles of landscape design and management to integrate old-growth forest enhancement and commodity use. Conservation Biology 8:752-762.
16. Sanders, D. A., R. J. Hobbs, and C. R. Margules. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conservation Biology 5:18-32.
17. Shands, W. E. 1988. Beyond multiple use: Managing national forests for distinctive values. American Forests 94:14-15, 56-57.
18. Turner, M. G., D. N. Wear, and R. O. Flamm. 1996. Land ownership and land cover change in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and Olympic Penninsula. Ecological Applications 6:1150-1172.
19. Wallin, D. O., F. J. Swanson, and B. Marks. 1994. Landscape pattern response to changes in pattern generation rules: Land-use legacies in forestry. Ecological Applications 4:569-580.