Viscoelastic behaviour of acrylic bone cements

Biomaterials

Volumn 19, Issue 17, 1998, Pages 1551-1559

  Yetkinler, Duran N ^a   Litsky, Alan S ^a  

^a Orthopaedic BioMaterials Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Acrylic bone cements; Stress relaxation tests; Viscoelastic behaviour

Indexed keywords

ACRYLICS; BIOMECHANICS; CREEP TESTING; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); JOINTS (ANATOMY); POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES; STRESS RELAXATION; VISCOELASTICITY;

IMPLANT LOOSENING; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY;

BONE CEMENT;

ACRYLIC CEMENT; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ARTICLE; BONE; IMPLANT; PHYSICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VISCOELASTICITY; WEIGHT BEARING;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE CEMENTS; ELASTICITY; METHACRYLATES; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0032170332     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00115-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. [1] Harris WH. The first 32 years of total hip arthroplasty: one surgeon's perspective. Clin Orthop 1992;274:6-11.
2. [2] Dee R, Mango E, Hurst LC. Principles of orthopaedic practice, vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989.
3. [3] Huiskes R, Nunamaker D. Local stress and bone adaption around orthopedic implants. Calcif Tissue Int 1984;36:S110-17.
4. [4] Brand RA, The interface of bone and cemented hip implants. In: Fitzgerald RH, editor. Non-cemented total hip arthroplasty. New York: Raven Press, 1988;243-50.
5. [5] Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Johnston RC, Milroy JC. The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction. Clin Orthop 1980;146:71-7.
6. [6] Huiskes R, Weinans H, Reitbergen BV. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop 1992;274: 124-34.
7. [7] Litsky AS, Yetkinler DN. Excessive local contact stresses initiate endoprosthesis loosening. In: Proceedings of the European Joint Conference on Engineering System Design and Analysis, 1992:33-45.
8. [8] Rose RM, Litsky AS. Biomechanical considerations in the loosening of hip replacement prostheses. In: Williams DF, editor. Current perspectives on implantable devices, vol. 1. London: JAI Press, 1988:1-45.
9. [9] Hertz H. Miscellaneous papers. London: Macmillan, 1896.
10. [10] Erdogan F, Gupta GD. The problem of an elastic stiffener bonded to a half plane. J Appl Mech 1971;38:937-41.
11. [11] Erdogan F, Civelek MB. Contact problem for an elastic reinforcement bonded to an elastic plate. J Appl Mech 1974;41:1014-8.
12. [12] Yetkinler DN. Viscoelastic behavior of acrylic bone cements. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, 1994.
13. [13] Litsky AS, Rose RM, Rubin CT, Thrasher EL. A reduced-modulus acrylic bone cement: preliminary results. J Orthop Res 1990;8:623-6.
14. [14] Standard specification of acrylic bone cement. ASTM 1986;F451-86:112-8.
15. [15] Tensile, compressive, and flexural creep and creep-rupture of plastics. ASTM 1976;D2990-77:498-505.
16. [16] Standard practice for testing stress-relaxation of plastics. ASTM 1985;D2991-84:506-8.
17. [17] Testing long-time creep and stress relaxation of plastics under tension or compression loads at various temperatures. ASTM 1964;D674-56:241-8.
18. [18] Vernon-Roberts B. The initial state. In: Lewis JL, Galante JO, editors. The bone-cement interface workshop report. Chicago: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1984:8-22.