A wetland simulation module for the MODFLOW ground water model

Ground Water

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 764-770

  Restrepo, Jorge I ^a   Montoya, Angela M ^a   Obeysekera, Jayantha ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Hydrologic Syst Modeling S F   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL FLOW; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FLOW INTERACTIONS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SURFACE WATERS; WETLANDS;

FLOW ROUTING; MANNING EQUATION; SOFTWARE PACKAGE MODFLOW; WETLAND FLOW HYDROPERIODS;

AQUIFERS;

AQUIFER; GROUNDWATER FLOW; MODELING; WATER TABLE; WETLAND;

EID: 0032169157     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02193.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cowardin, L.M. 1979. Classification of Wetlands Habitats of the United States, 44-45. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Department of Interior.
2. Freeze, R.A., and J.A. Cherry. 1979. Groundwater. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
3. Kadlec, R.H. 1990. Overland flow in wetlands: Vegetation resistance. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 116, 691.
4. Lal, W. 1996a. Performance comparison of overland flow algorithms. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. (Manuscript available from South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida.)
5. Lal, W. 1996b. A weighted implicit finite volume model for overland flow. Manuscript available from South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida.
6. Lewandowski, J.A. 1993. Vegetation resistance and circulation modeling in a tidal wetland. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley, California.
7. McDonald, M.G., A.W. Harbaugh, B.R. Orr, and D.J. Ackermon. 1992. A method of converting no flow cells to variable head cells for the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite difference groundwater flow model. USGS Open-File Report 91-536.
8. McDonald, M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model. USGS Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations Report, Book 6, Chapter A1.
9. McWhorter, D.B., and D.K. Sunada. 1977. Groundwater Hydrology and Hydraulics. Fort Collins, Colorado: Water Resources Publications.
10. Mitsch, W.J., and J.G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
11. Merritt, M.L. 1995. Simulation of the water-table altitude in the Biscayne Aquifer, Southern Dade County, Florida, water years 1945-89. Tallahassee, Florida: USGS.
12. Restrepo, J.I., C. Bevier, and D. Butler. 1992. A three dimensional finite difference groundwater flow model of the surficial aquifer system, Broward County, Florida. Technical Publication 92-05, p. 262. West Palm Beach, Florida: South Florida Water Management District.
13. Restrepo, J.I., M. Jensen, and K. Magnuson. 1996. Evapotranspiration study and knowledge-base development. Final Report, Contract C-3223, vol. 1. West Palm Beach, Florida: South Florida Water Management District.
14. Singh, V.P. 1996. Kinematic Wave Modeling in Water Resources: Surface-water Hydrology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
15. Swain, E., and E. Wexler. 1993. A coupled surface-water and ground-water flow model for simulation of stream-aquifer interaction. USGS Open-File Report 92-138.