An in vitro biocompatibility evaluation of double-J stents

Urology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 524-530

  Pariente, J L ^a   Bordenave, L ^b   Valli, N ^b   Bareille, R ^b   Baquey, Ch ^b   Le Guillou, M ^b  

^a HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; HYPERPLASIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINE CATHETER; UROTHELIUM;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELLS, CULTURED; HUMANS; STENTS; URINARY CATHETERIZATION; UROTHELIUM;

EID: 0032168653     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00198-8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 1. Mardis HK, Kroeger MR, Morton JJ, et al: Comparative evaluation of materials used for internal ureteral stents. J Endourol 7: 105-114, 1993.
2. 2. Ruutu M, Talja M, Anderson LC, et al: Biocompatibility of urinary catheters. Scand J Urol Nephrol 138: 235-238, 1991.
3. 3. Cormio L, Talja M, Koivusalo A, et al: Biocompatibility of various indwelling double J stents. J Urol 153: 494-496, 1995.
4. 4. Fuse H, Ohkawa M, Nakashima T, et al: Crystal adherence to urinary catheter materials in rats. J Urol 151: 1703-1706, 1994.
5. 5. Marx M, Bettmann MA, Bridge S, et al: The effects of various indwelling ureteral catheter materials on the normal canine ureter. J Urol 139: 180-185, 1988.
6. 6. Ruutu M, Alfthan O, Talja M, et al: Cytotoxicity of latex urinary catheters. Br J Urol 57: 82-87, 1985.
7. 7. Talja M, Andersson LC, Ruutu M, et al: Toxicity testing of urinary catheters. Br J Urol 57: 579-584, 1985.
8. 8. Graham DT, Mark GE, MacArthur EB, et al: In vivo validation of a cell culture test for biocompatibility testing of urinary catheters. J Biomed Mater Res 18: 1125-1135, 1984.
9. 9. Harmand MF, Bordenave L, Duphil R, et al: Human differentiated cell cultures: in vitro models for characterization of cell/biomaterial interface, in Christel P, Meunier A, and Lee AJC (Eds): Biological and Biomechanical Performances of Biomaterials. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1986, pp 361-366.
10. 10. Harmand MF: Cytotoxicity, toxicological risk evaluation using cell culture, in Braybrook JH (Ed): Biocompatibility Assessment of Medical Devices and Materials. New York, Wiley, 1997, pp 119-128.
11. 11. Kirkpatrick CJ, and Mittermayer C: Theoretical and practical aspects of testing potential biomaterials in vitro. J Mater Sci 1:9-13, 1990.
12. 12. Ciapetti G, Cenni E, Cavedagna D, et al: Cell culture methods to evaluate the biocompatibility of implant materials. Altern Lab Animals 20: 52-60, 1992.
13. 13. AFNOR-NF EN 30993-5: Evaluation biologique des dispositifs médicaux. Partie 5: Essais concernant la cytotoxicité: Méthodes in vitro. Paris, France, November 1994.
14. 14. ISO10993-5: Biological evaluation of medical devices. Test for cytotoxicity: in vitro methods. Geneva, Switzerland, 1992.
15. 15. Pariente JL, Bordenave L, Bareille R, et al: First use of normal human urothelial cells in culture for biocompatibility assessment: application to urinary catheters. J Biomed Mater Res 40: 31-39, 1998.
16. 16. Hutton KAR, Trejdosiewicz LK, Thomas DFM, et al: Urothelial tissue culture for bladder reconstruction: an experimental study. J Urol 150: 721-725, 1993.
17. 17. Southgate J, Hutton KAR, Thomas DFM, et al: Normal human urothelial cells in vitro: proliferation and induction of stratification. Lab Invest 71: 583-594, 1994.
18. 18. Parish CR, and Mullbacher A: Automated colorimetric assay for T-cell cytotoxicity. J Immunol Methods 58: 225-237, 1983.
19. 19. Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65: 55-63, 1983.
20. 20. Sgouras D, and Duncan R: Methods for the evaluation of biocompatibility of soluble synthetic polymers which have potential for biomedical use: 1 - use of the tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay (MTT) as a preliminary screen for evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity. J Mater Sci 1: 61-68, 1990.
21. 21. Hauschka PV, Mavrakos AE, Iafrati MD, et al: Growth factors in bone matrix. J Biol Chem 261: 12665-12674, 1986.
22. 22. Annual Book of American Society for Testing and Materials Standards F748: Practice for selecting generic biological test methods for materials and devices. F 813: Standard practice for direct contact cell culture evaluation of materials for medical devices. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1991.