Mitral valve replacement: Randomized trial of St. Jude and medtronic hall prostheses

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 707-712

  Fiore, Andrew C ^a   Barner, Hendrick B ^a   Swartz, Marc T ^a   McBride, Lawrence R ^a   Labovitz, Arthur J ^a   Vaca, Kathy J ^a   St Vrain, Jan ^a   Grunkemeier, Gary L ^a   Kaiser, George C ^a  

^a S LOUIS UNIV HLTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032167735     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00670-5     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. 1. Principal investigators of CASS and their associates. The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Circulation 1981;63(Suppl 1):1-81.
2. 2. Mehdirad AA, Williams GA, Bryg RJ, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular function with upright exercise: correlation of exercise Doppler with post-exercise wall motion and single plane echocardiographic ejection fraction. Circulation 1987; 75:413-9.
3. 3. Hatle L, Angelsen B, Tromsdal A. Non-invasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1969;60:1096-104.
4. 4. Bryg RB, Williams GA, Labovitz AJ, Aker U, Kennedy HL. Effect of atrial fibrillation and mitral regurgitation on calculated mitral valve area: comparison of Doppler, two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:634-8.
5. 5. Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:932-5.
6. 6. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719-48.
7. 7. Anthunes MJ. Clinical performance of St. Jude and Medtronic Hall prostheses: a randomized comparative study. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:743-7.
8. 8. Fiore AC, Naunheim KS, D'Orazio S, et al. Mitral valve replacement: randomized trial of St. Jude and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:68-73.
9. 9. Keenan RJ, Armitage JM, Trento A, et al. Clinical experience with the Medtronic Hall valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:748-53.
10. 10. Arom KV, Nicoloff DM, Kersten TE, et al. Ten years' experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:831-7.
11. 11. Vallejo JL, Gonzales-Santos JM, Albertos J, et al. Eight years' experience with the Medtronic Hall valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:429-36.
12. 12. Ibrahim M, Cleland J, O'Kane H, Gladstone D, Mulholland C, Craig B. The St. Jude Medical prosthesis: a thirteen-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:221-30.
13. 13. Anthunes MJ, Wessels A, Sadowski RG, et al. Medtronic Hall replacement in a third-world population group. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;95:980-93.
14. 1/2 year experience with the St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:137-44.
15. 15. Nitter-Hauge S, Abdelnoor M. Ten-year experience with the Medtronic Hall valvular prosthesis. Circulation 1989;80 (Suppl 1):43-8.