The Short Interpersonal Reactions Inventory, Self-regulation and Differentiation scales in an older Australian twin sample

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 591-604

  Kirk, Katherine M ^a   Martin, Nicholas G ^a  

^a ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Agitation; Differentiation; Inhibition; Self regulation; SIRI

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032165922     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00116-0     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Amelang, M., & Schmidt-Rathjens, C. (1992). Personality, stress and disease: some results on the psychometric properties of the Grossarth-Maticek and Eysenck inventories. Psychological Reports, 71, 1251-1263.
2. Amelang, M., Schmidt-Rathjens, C., & Matthews, G. (1996). Personality, cancer and coronary heart disease: Further evidence on a controversial issue. British Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 191-205.
3. DeGroot, M.H. (1986). Probability and statistics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
4. Eysenck, H.J. (1991). Smoking, personality and stress: psychosocial factors in the prevention of cancer and coronary heart disease. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Friedman, M. & Rosenman, R.H. (1974). Type A behavior and your heart. New York: Knopf.
6. Greer, S., & Watson, M. (1985). Towards a psychobiological model of cancer: psychological considerations. Social Science and Medicine, 20, 773-777.
7. Grossarth-Maticek, R., & Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Personality, stress and disease: description and validation of a new inventory. Psychological Reports, 66, 355-373.
8. Harman, H.H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Larsson, G., Nordström, L., Ljunggren, G., Nyberg, A.-B., Resare, B., Sehedwin, G., & Wahlgren, M. (1995). The Grossarth-Maticek and Eysenck Personality Types, health-related behavior, and indicators of transitory ill-health. European Journal of Personality, 9, 75-87.
10. McDonald, R.P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Pfundt, C. (1994). Die Bedeutung von Hemmung und Aufregung für die Differenzierung von Typ1 und 2 der Grossarth'schen Typologie. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Onkologie, 26, 67-75.
12. Roberts, L. J., Duffy, D. L., & Martin, N. G. (1995). A psychometric evaluation of the Short Interpersonal Reactions Inventory (SIRI) in an Australian twin sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 307-320.
13. Temoshok, L. (1987). Personality, coping style, emotion and cancer: towards an integrative model. Cancer Surveys, 6, 545-567.
14. SAS Institute (1995). SAS Version 6.11 [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.