Collision Avoidance Using a Cerebellar Model Arithmetic Computer Neural Network

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 303-314

  Eskandarian, Azim ^a   Thiriez, Stephane ^a  

^a George Washington University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLISION AVOIDANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; SENSORY PERCEPTION; STEERING;

CEREBELLAR MODEL ARITHMETIC COMPUTER NEURAL NETWORK; HUMAN SENSORY MOTOR RESPONSES;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 0032165136     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0885-9507.00109     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Albus, J. S., A theory of cerebellar function, Mathematical Biosciences, 10 (1971), 25-61.
2. Albus, J. S., A new approach to manipulator control: The cerebellar model articulation controller (CMAC), ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurements and Control, 97 (1975), 220-7.
3. Barraquand, J., Langlois, B. & Latombe, J., Numerical Potential Field Techniques for Robot Path Planning, report no. STANCS-89-1285, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, 1989.
4. Barraquand, J. & Latombe. J., Robot motion planning: A distributed representation approach, International Journal of Robotic Research. 10 (6) (1991), 51-72.
5. Eskandarian. A., Bedewi, N. E., Kramer, B. M. & Barbera, A. J., Dynamics modeling of robotic manipulators using an artificial neural network, Journal of Robotic Systems, 11 (1) (1994), 41-56.
6. Hagleitner, W., Convenience: A first step towards collision avoidance, in Proceedings of ITS America Workshop on Collision Avoidance Systems: Issues and Opportunities, Reston, VA, March 1994, pp. 103-23.
7. Hunt, J. G. & Lyons, G. D., Modeling dual carriageway lane changing using neural networks, Transportation Research C, 2 (4) (1994), 231-45.
8. Khatib, O., Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots, International Journal of Robotics Research, 5 (1986), 90-8.
9. Mel, B. W. & Kotch, C., Sigma-pi learning: On radial basis functions and cortical associative learning, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 2, D. S. Touretsky (ed.), Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, 1990.
10. Miller, W. T., III, Glantz, F. H., & Kraft, L. G., CMAC: An associative neutral network alternative to backpropagation, Proceedings of IEEE, 78 (10) (1990), 1561-67.
11. Moody, J. & Darken, C., Fast learning in networks of locallytuned processing units, Neural Computation, 1 (1989), 281-94.
12. Najm, W. G., A review of IVHS collision avoidance technologies, in Proceedings of ITS America Workshop on Collision Avoidance Systems: Issues and Opportunities, March 1994, Reston, VA, pp. 134-47.
13. Newman, W. S. & Hogan, N., High speed robot control and obstacle avoidance using dynamic potential functions, in Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1985.
14. Pomerleau, D. A., Neural Network Perception for Mobile Robot Guidance, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1993.
15. Pomerleau, D. A., Efficient training of artificial neural networks for autonomous navigation, Neural Computation, 3 (1) (1991).
16. Thorpe, C. (ed.), Vision and Navigation: The CMU NAVLAB, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1990.
17. Wong, Y., CMAC learning is governed by a single parameter, in IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 1, 1993, pp. 1439-43.
18. Wong, Y. F. & Sideris, A., Learning convergence in the cerebellar model articulation controller, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 3 (1) (1992), 115-21.