Commentary: Evaluation planning is the heart of the matter

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 385-391

  Scheirer, Mary Ann ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032162302     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821409801900311     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Conrad, K. J. (Ed.) (1994). Critically evaluating the role of experiments. (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 63). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Orwin, R. G. (1997). Twenty-one years and counting: The interrupted time series design comes of age. In E. Chelimsky & W. R Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp.443-465). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Marcantonio, R. J., & Cook, T. D. (1994). Convincing quasi-experiments: The interrupted time series and regression-discontinuity designs. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 133-154). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
5. Shadish, W. R., Newman, D. L., Scheirer, M.A., & Wye, C. (Eds.), (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Trochim, W. M. K. (1984). Research designs for program evaluation: The regression discontinuity approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.