A reliability comparison of submentovertex and zonographic methods of horizontal condylar angle estimation

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 370-375

  Benson, Byron W ^a   Frederiksen, Neil L ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; HUMANS; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT;

EID: 0032162054     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90187-1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Danforth RA, Otis LL, Kipnis V, Ong SH, Voss R. Corrected TMJ tomography: effectiveness of alternatives to SMV tracing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:547-52.
2. Brooks SL, Brand JW, Gibbs SJ, Rollender L, Lurie AG, Omnell K-A, et al. Imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:609-18.
3. Pullinger AG, White SC. Efficacy of TMJ radiographs in terms of expected versus actual findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995:79;367-74.
4. White SC, Pullinger AG. Impact of TMJ radiographs on clinician decision making. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995:79;375-81.
5. Yale SH, Rosenberg HM, Cellabos M, Hauptfuehrer JD. Laminagraphic cephalometry in the analysis of mandibular condyle morphology: a preliminary report. Oral Surg 1961; 14:793-805.
6. Williamson EH, Wilson CW. Use of a submental-vertex analysis for producing quality temporomandibular joint laminagraphs. Am J Orthod 1976;70:200-7.
7. Kurz CS. A practical method of producing roentgenograms for diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular lesions. Illinois Dental Journal 1943;12:446-50.
8. Schier MBA. New technique for radiography of the temporomandibular articulation. Dental Items of Interest 1943;65:324-36.
9. Updegrave WJ. Temporomandibular articulation: x-ray examination. Dental Radiography and Photography 1953;26:41-52.
10. Rosenberg HM, Graczyk R. Temporomandibular articulation tomography: a corrected anteroposterior and lateral cephalometric technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986:62;198-204.
11. Operating instructions for Scanora. Helsinki: Orion Corporation Soredex; 1991. p. 29-31, 44-8, 72-8.
12. Hallikainan D, Gröndahl H-G, Kanerva H, Tammisalo E. Optimized sequential dentomaxillofacial radiography: the Scanora concept. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino; 1992. p. 10-2.
13. Lysell L, Petersson A. The submento-vertex projection in radiography of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1980;9:11-7.
14. Yale SH, Allison BD, Hauptfuehrer JD. An epidemiological assessment of mandibular condyle morphology. Oral Surg 1966;21:169-77.
15. Yale SH. Radiographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint. J Am Dent Assoc 1969;79:102-7.