Dimensional changes during veneering procedures on discoloured teeth

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 569-576

  Meijering, A C ^a,d   Peters, M C R B ^b   DeLong, R ^c   Pintado, M R ^c   Creugers, N H J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Graphics; Veneers

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; PATHOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH DISCOLORATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL VENEERS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCISOR; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH DISCOLORATION; TOOTH PREPARATION; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 0032161386     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00038-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Calamia J. R. Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of the art. Quintessence International, 1985;16:5-12.
2. Clyde J. S., Gilmour A. Porcelain veneers: a preliminary review. British Dental Journal, 1988;164:9-14.
3. Welbury R. R. A clinical study of a microfilled composite resin for labial veneers. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 1991;1:9-15.
4. Sheet C. G., Taniguchi T. Advantages and limitations in the use of porcelain veneer restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1990;64:406-411.
5. Ferrari M., Patroni S., Balleri P. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. International Journal of Periodontal and Restorative Dentistry, 1992;5:406-413.
6. Garber D. Porcelain laminate veneers: ten years later. Part I: Tooth preparation. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, 1993;2:57-62.
7. Meijering A. C., Creugers N. H. J., Mulder J. et al. Treatment times for three different types of veneer restorations. Journal of Dentistry, 1995;23:21-26.
8. Williams D. F., Cunningham J., Lalor M. J. et al. Laser techniques for the evaluation of wear in Class II restorations. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1983;10:407-414.
9. Roulet J. F., Reich T. H., Lutz F. High precision occlusal mapping: a new method for measuring wear of posterior composites. Journal of Dental Research, 1983;62(Abstr. 457):220.
10. Lambrechts P., Vanherle G., Vuylsteke M. et al. Quantitative evaluation of the wear resistance of posterior dental restorations; a new three-dimensional measuring technique. Journal of Dentistry, 1984;12:252-267.
11. DeLong R., Pintado M. R., Douglas W. H. Measurement of change in surface contour by computer graphics. Dental Materials, 1985;1:27-30.
12. Roulet, J. F., In vivo wear measurements of composite resin. In G. Vanherle and D.C. Smith. Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials, (ed.) Peter Szulc, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1985, pp. 365-372.
13. Christensen R., Bangerter V., Christensen G. Six visual wear measurement methods compared to occlusal mapping. Journal of Dental Research, 1988;67(Abstr. 849):219.
14. Kunzelmann K. H., Mehl A., Gloger W. et al. Evaluation system for 3-D wear measurement without reference points. Journal of Dental Research, 1996;75(1913):257.
15. Douglas W. H., DeLong R. Anatomical measurement in restorative dentistry. Northwestern Dentistry, 1990;10:27-29.
16. DeLong R., Pintado M. R., Douglas W. H. Accuracy of epoxy models for quantifying changes in occlusal anatomy. Journal of Dental Research, 1991;70(2457):573.
17. DeLong, R. and Douglas, W. H., Quantitative assessment of anatomical change in the human dentition. In Proceedings of 12th Annual International Conference IEEE-EMBS, Philadelphia, PA, Vol. 12, 1990:2054-2055.
18. Peters M. C. R. B., DeLong R., Pintado M. R. et al. Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear. Journal of Dental Research, 1991;70(Abstr. 271):229.
19. Pintado M. R., DeLong R., Douglas W. H. et al. Physiologic wear of enamel contacts. Journal of Dental Research, 1990;69(Abstr. 529):175.
20. Pintado M. R., Conry J. P., Douglas W. H. Measurement of sealant volume in vivo using image-processing technology. Quintessence International, 1988;19:613-617.
21. Peters M. C. R. B., Pallesen U., DeLong R. et al. Clinical wear of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations: 2-year results. Journal of Dental Research, 1994;73(Abstr. 324):979.
22. DeLong R., Sasik C., Pintado M.R. et al. The wear of enamel when opposed by ceramic systems. Dental Materials, 1989;5:266-271.
23. DeLong R., Pintado M. R., Douglas W. H. The wear of enamel opposing shaded ceramic restorative materials: an in vitro study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1992;68:42-48.
24. Taylor J. L., Spencer J. L., Breuer M. M. et al. Digital technique for measuring changes in gingival contour. Journal of Dental Research, 1993;72(Abstr. 1115):243.
25. Neafus T., DeLong R., Douglas W.H. et al. Quantitative vs. qualitative measurements of gingival health. Journal of Dental Research, 1996;75(Abstr. 1551):211.
26. Anderson J. C., DeLong R., Douglas W. H. et al. Accuracy of a profiling system for evaluation of occlusal changes. Journal of Dental Research, 1993;72(Abstr. 1601):303.
27. DeLong R., Douglas W. H. An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1991;38:339-345.
28. Nattress B. R., Youngson C. C., Patterson C. J. W. et al. An in vitro assessment of tooth preparation for porcelain veneer restorations. Journal of Dentistry, 1995;23:165-170.
29. Meijering, A. C., Roeters, F. J. M., Mulder, J. et al., Patients' satisfaction with different types of veneer restorations. Journal of Dentistry, 1997;25:493-497.