Incidences and Effects of Diseases on the Performance of Swedish Dairy Herds Stratified by Production

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 81, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 2376-2382

  Emanuelson, U ^a   Oltenacu, P A ^b  

^a Swed Assoc Livestock Breed Prod   (Sweden)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Dairy cows; Estrus detection efficiency; Herd production; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

BOS TAURUS; FRIESIA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; ENDOMETRITIS; ESTRUS; FEMALE; LACTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTION; RETAINED PLACENTA; SWEDEN;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; ENDOMETRITIS; ESTRUS DETECTION; FEMALE; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; LACTATION; PLACENTA, RETAINED; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTION; SWEDEN;

EID: 0032160433     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70129-8     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ekman, T. 1998. A study of dairy herds with constantly low or constantly high bulk milk somatic cell count - with special emphasis on management. Acta Univ. Agric. Sueciae Veterinaria 32. Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci., Uppsala, Sweden.
2. Emanuelson, U. 1988. The national Swedish animal disease recording system. Acta Vet. Scand. Suppl. 84:262-264.
3. Emanuelson, U., P. A. Oltenacu, and Y. T. Gröhn. 1993. Non-linear mixed model analyses of five production disorders of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 76:2765-2772.
4. Enevoldsen, C., J. Hindhede, and T. Kristensen. 1996. Dairy herd management types assessed from indicators of health, reproduction, replacement, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 79:1221-1236.
5. Erb, H. N. 1987. Interrelationships among production and clinical disease in dairy cattle: a review. Can. Vet. J. 28:326-329.
6. Fetrow, J., D. McClary, R. Harman, K. Butcher, L. Weaver, E. Studer, J. Ehrich, W. Etherington, W. Guterbock, D. Klingborg, J. Reneau, and N. Williamson. 1990. Calculating selected reproductive indices: recommendations of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners. J. Dairy Sci. 73:78-90.
7. Meyer, K. 1986. Restricted maximum likelihood to estimate genetic parameters - in practice. Proc. 3rd World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Lincoln, NE XIII:454-459.
8. Meyer, K. 1987. Restricted maximum likelihood programs for the analysis of animal breeding data. Program notes prepared for workshop, Mar. 2-6, Orange, New South Wales, Australia. Inst. Anim. Genet., Edinburgh Univ., Edinburgh, Scotland.
9. Misztal, I., D. Gianola, and J. L. Foulley. 1989. Computing aspects of a nonlinear method of sire evaluation for categorical data. J. Dairy Sci. 72:1557-1568.
10. Mohammed, H. O. 1990. A multivariate indexing system for hygiene in relation to the risk of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in chickens. Prev. Vet. Med. 9:75-83.
11. Oltenacu, P. A., and I. Ekesbo. 1994. Epidemiological study of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Vet. Res. 25:208-212.
12. Oltenacu, P. A., A. Frick, and B. Lindhé. 1990. Epidemiological studies of several diseases, reproductive performance, and culling in primiparous Swedish cattle. Prev. Vet. Med. 9:59-74.
13. Solbu, H. 1983. Disease recording in Norwegian dairy cattle. I. Disease incidence and non-genetic effects on mastitis, ketosis and milk fever. Z. Tierz. Zuechtsbiol. 100:139-157.
14. Strandberg, E., and P. A. Oltenacu. 1989. Economic consequences of different calving intervals. Acta Agric. Scand. 39: 407-420.