Evaluation of treatment with a pulsed electromagnetic field on wound healing, clinicopathologic variables, and central nervous system activity of dogs

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 59, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 1177-1181

  Scardino, M Stacie ^a,c   Swaim, Steven F ^a   Sartin, Eva A ^a   Steiss, Janet E ^a   Spano, Joseph S ^a   Hoffman, Charles E ^a,d   Coolman, Shindok L ^a   Peppin, Barbara L ^b,c  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Integra Animal Health   (United States)

^c Tuskegee University ^*  (United States)

^d TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DOG; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FEMALE; INJURY; LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SKIN; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DOGS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FEMALE; LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; SKIN; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0032160008     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hallett M, Cohen LG. Magnetism, a new method for stimulation of nerve and brain. JAMA 1989;262:538-541.
2. Bassett CA. Beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields. J Cell Biochem 1993;51:387-393.
3. Kuliev RA, Babaev RF, Akhmedova LM, et al. Treatment of suppurative wounds in patients with diabetes mellitus by magnetic field and laser irradiation. Khirurgiia Mosk 1992;7-8:30-33.
4. Ieran M, Zaffuto S, Bagnacani M, et al. Effect of low frequency pulsing electromagnetic fields on skin ulcers of venous origin in humans: a double-blind study. J Orthop Res 1990;8:276-282.
5. Salzberg CA, Cooper-Vastola SA, Perez F, et al. The effects of non-thermal pulsed electromagnetic energy on wound healing of pressure ulcers in spinal cord-injured patients: a randomized, double-blind study. Ostomy Wound Management 1995;41:42-48.
6. Stefanovska A, Vodovnik L, Benko H, et al. Treatment of chronic wounds by means of electric and electromagnetic fields. Part 2. Value of FES parameters for pressure sore treatment. Med Biol Eng Comput 1993;31:213-220.
7. Stiller MJ, Pak GH, Shupack JL, et al. A portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) device to enhance healing of recalcitrant venous ulcers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 1992;127:147-154.
8. Todd DJ, Heylings DJ, Allen GE, et al. Treatment of chronic varicose ulcers with pulsed electromagnetic fields: a controlled pilot study. Ir Med J 1991;84:54-55.
9. Ottani V, DePasquale V, Govani P, et al. Effects of pulsed extremely low frequency magnetic fields on skin wounds in the rat. Bioelectromagnetics 1988;9:53-62.
10. Ottani V, Pasquale V, Govani P, et al. Augmentation of bone repair by pulsed extremely low frequency magnetic fields in rats. Anat Anz 1991;172:143-147.
11. Gaiduk VI, Shachkova NK, Fedorovskaia EA. Effect of a flow-frequency alternating magnetic field on the microflora and healing of burn wounds. Vestn Khir 1985;134:69-74.
12. Auer JA, Burch GE, Hall P. Review of pulsing electromagnetic field therapy and its possible application to horses. Equine Vet J 1983;15:354-360.
13. Bell GB, Marino AA, Chesson AL. Frequency-specific responses in the human brain caused by electromagnetic fields. J Neurol Sci 1994;123:26-32.
14. Redding RW. Electroencephalography. In: Oliver JE, Hoerlein BF, Mayhew IG, eds. Veterinary neurology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1987;111-145.
15. Lee AH, Swaim SF, Yang ST, et al. Effects of gentamicin solution and cream on the healing of open wounds. Am J Vet Res 1984;45:1487-1492.
16. Swaim SF, Bradley DM, Spano JS, et al. Evaluation of multipeptide-copper complex medications on open wound healing in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1993;29:519-525.
17. Swaim SF, Henderson RA. Wound healing. In: Small animal wound management. 2nd ed. Media, Pa: The Williams & Wilkins Co, 1997;1-12.
18. Swaim SF, Riddell KP, McGuire JA. Effects of topical medications on the healing of open pad wounds in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992;28:499-502.