Conflict analysis for double left-turn lanes with protected-plus-permitted signal phases

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1635, 1998, Pages 105-112

  Tarrall, Mark B ^a   Dixon, Karen K ^b  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology ^*  (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; HIGHWAY ACCIDENTS; INTERSECTIONS; TRAFFIC SIGNALS;

DOUBLE LEFT-TURN LANES; TRAFFIC SIGNAL PHASING;

HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 0032157070     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1635-14     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Permissive Double Left Turns: Are They Safe? Traffic Signal Technical Committee of the Colorado/Wyoming Section of ITE, 1995.
2. Florida Section Institute of Transportation Engineering. Left Turn Phase Design in Florida. ITE Journal, September 1982.
3. Warren, D. L. Accident Analysis of Left-Turn Phasing. Public Roads, Vol. 48, No. 4, March 1985.
4. Agent, K. R. Guidelines for the Use of Protected/Permissive Left-Turn Phasing. Research Report UKTRP-85-19. Kentucky Transportation Research Program, University of Kentucky and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, 1985.
5. Parker, M. R., and C. V. Zegeer. Traffic Conflict Techniques for Safety and Operations: Engineer's Guide. Report FHWA-IP-88-026. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1988.
6. Robertson, H. D., J. E. Hummer, and D. C. Nelson, eds. Chapter 12. Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies. ITE, Prentice Hall, N.J., 1994.
7. Glauz, W. D., and D. J. Migletz. NCHRP Report 219: Application of Traffic Conflict Analysis at Intersections. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980.