Comparative study of asphalt concrete laboratory compaction methods to simulate field compaction

Construction and Building Materials

Volumn 12, Issue 6-7, 1998, Pages 373-384

  Khan, Ziauddin A ^a   Al Abdul Wahab, Hamad I ^a   Asi, Ibrahim ^a   Ramadhan, Rezqallah ^a  

^a KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Asphalt; Compaction; Concrete; Marshall test

Indexed keywords

ASPHALT; COMPACTION; COMPOSITION EFFECTS; CONCRETE MIXING; CREEP; IMPACT TESTING;

ASPHALT CONCRETE; CONCRETE MIXTURES; MARSHALL TESTS;

CONCRETE TESTING;

EID: 0032156292     PISSN: 09500618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-0618(98)00015-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Goetz WH. The evolution of asphalt concrete mix design. ASTM STP 1041, 1989.
2. Linden F, Van Der Heiden J. Some aspect of the compaction of asphalt mix and its influence on mix properties. Proc Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 1989;58:571-623.
3. Kumar A, Goetz WH. The gyratory testing machine a design tool and an instrument for bituminous mixture evaluation. Proc Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 1974;43:350-371.
4. National Center Of Asphalt Technology. Introduction to the SHRP SUPERPAVE system level 1 mixture design. Lecture Notes, November, 1993.
5. Linden RN, Mahoney JP, Jackson NC. Effect of compaction on asphalt concrete performance. Transportation research record No. 1217. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 1992:20-28.
6. Powel WD, Lister NW. Compaction of bituminous materials. In: Pell PS, editor. Developments in highway pavement engineering - 1, London: Applied Science Publishers, 1978:127-162.
7. Scherocman JA, Acott M. Hot mix asphalt production, placement, and compaction related to pavement performance. Proc Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 1989;58:571-623.
8. Sousa JB, Deacon JA, Monismith CL. Effect of the laboratory compaction method on permanent deformation characteristics of asphalt aggregate mixtures.. Proc Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 1991;60:533-585.
9. George KP. Resilient testing of soils using gyratory testing machine. Transportation research record No. 1369. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 1994:63-72.
10. ASTM. Compaction and shear properties of bituminous mixtures by means of US corps of engineers gyratory testing machine. ASTM D 3387, ASTM Part 15, 1982.
11. Sigurjonsson S, Ruth B. Use of gyratory testing machine to evaluate shear resistance of asphalt paving mixture. Transportation research record No. 1259. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 1992:63-72.
12. SHRP. The SUPERPAVE mix design system, manual of specifications, test methods, and practices. In: Harrigan ET, editor. Washington, DC: National Research Council, 1994.
13. Anderson RM. SUPERPAVE level 1 mixture design example. Lexington: Asphalt Institute, 1993.
14. Consuergra A, Little DN, Quintus HV, Burati J. Comparative evaluation of laboratory compaction devices based on their ability to produce mixtures with engineering properties similar to those produced in the field. Transportation research record No. 1228. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 1992:80-87.
15. Busching HW, Goetz WH. Use of gyratory testing machine in evaluating bituminous mixtures. Highway research record 51. Washington, DC: HRB National Research Council, 1964:1-43.
16. Development of gyratory Texas machine and procedures for testing bituminous mixtures. Technical report 3595. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, 1962.
17. Van de Loo PJ. The creep test: a key tool in asphalt mix design and in the prediction of pavement rutting. Proc Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 1978;47:522-557.
18. Al-Abdul Wahab HI, Ramadhan RH. Manifestation of temperature variation of flexible and rigid pavements in Dhahran in Saudi Arabia. Fourth Saudi Engineering Conference Jeddah Saudi Arabia, July 1995.