A Multibody Factorization Method for Independently Moving Objects

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 159-179

  Costeira, João Paulo ^a   Kanade, Takeo ^b  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

3D vision; Computer vision; Image understanding; Invariants; Motin analysis; Shape from motion

Indexed keywords

IMAGE SEGMENTATION; IMAGE UNDERSTANDING; INVARIANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MOTION CONTROL; OBJECT RECOGNITION; TRAJECTORIES; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; MOTION ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

MOTION ANALYSIS; INVARIANTS; SHAPE FROM MOTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) VISION;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0032154138     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008000628999     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adelson, E. and Bergen, J. 1985. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2(2):284-299.
2. Bergen, J., Burt, P., Hingorani, R., and Peleg, S. 1990. Computing two motions from three frames. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.
3. Bienvenu, G. and Kopp, L. 1979. Principe de la noniometre passive adaptive. In Proc. 7'eme Colloque GRETSI, Nice, France, pp. 106/1-106/10.
4. Boult, T. and Brown, L. 1991. Factorization-based segmentation of motions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion.
5. Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., and Rivest, R.L. 1986. Introduction to Algorithms. The MIT Press.
6. ∼jpc.
7. Demmel, J. 1987. The smallest perturbation of a submatrix which lowers the rank and constrained total least squares problems. SIAM Journal of Numverical Analysis, 24(1).
8. Faugeras, O. 1994. Three Dimensional Computer Vision. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
9. Gear, C.W. 1994. Feature grouping in moving objects. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Motion of Non-Rigid and Articulated Objects, Austin, Texas.
10. Golub, G., Hoffman, A., and Stewart, G. 1987. A generalization of the eckart-young-mirsky approximation theorem. Linear Algebra Applications.
11. Irani, M., Benny, R., and Peleg, S. 1994. Computing occluding and transparent motions. International Journal of Computer Vision, 12(1):5-16.
12. Jasinschi, R.S., Rosenfeld, A., and Sumi, K. 1992. Perceptual motion transparency: the role of geometrical information. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 9(11):1-15.
13. Koenderink, J. and van Doom, A. 1991. Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 8(2):377-385.
14. Poelman, C. and Kanade, T. 1993. A paraperspective factorization method for shape and motion recovery. Technical Report CS-93-219, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
15. Poelman, C. 1995. The paraperspective and projective factorization method for recovering shape and motion. Technical Report Also SCS Report CMU-CS-95-173, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
16. Schmidt, R. 1980. A signal subspace approach to multiple emitter location and spectral estimation. PhD Thesis, Stanford University, CA.
17. Sinclair, D. 1993. Motion segmentation and local structure. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Vision.
18. Stewart, G.W. 1992. Determining rank in the presence of error. In Proceedings of the NATO Workshop on Large Scale Linear Algebra, Leuven, Belgium. Also University of Maryland Tech. Report.
19. Tomasi, C. and Kanade, T. 1992. Shape from motion from image streams under orthography: A factorization method. International Journal of Computer Vision, 9(2):137-154. Originally published as CMU Technical Report CMU-CS-90-166, September 1990.
20. Ullman, S. 1983. Maximizing rigidity: The incremental recovery of 3D structure from rigid and rubbery motion. Technical Report A.I. Memo No. 721, MIT.
21. Van Trees. H. 1968. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, vol. 1. Wiley: New York.
22. Wilson, R. 1994. Modeling and calibration of automated zoom lenses. PhD Thesis, ECE, Carnegie Mellon University.