Casemix and process indicators of outcome in stroke: The Royal College of Physicians minimum data set for stroke

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 442-444

  Irwin, P ^a   Rudd, A ^b  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS   (United Kingdom)

^b ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; HUMAN; MEDICAL AUDIT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;

CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);

EID: 0032153472     PISSN: 00358819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Davenport RJ, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. Effect of correcting outcome data for casemix: an example from stroke medicine. Br Med J 1996;312:1503-5.
2. Bamford J, Dennis M, Sandercock P, Burn J, Warlow C. The frequency, causes and timing of death within 30 days of a first ever stroke: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:824-9.
3. Westling B, Norrving M, Thorngren M. Survival following stroke. A prospective population based study of 438 hospitalised cases with prediction according to subtype, severity and age. Acta Neurol Scand 1990;81:457-63.
4. Alexander MP. Stroke rehabilitation outcome: a potential use of predictive variables to establish levels of care. Stroke 1994; 25:128-34.
5. Nakayama H, Jogensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. The influence of age on stroke outcome: The Copenhagen Study. Stroke 1994; 25:808-13.
6. Bamford, J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Warlow C, et al. A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project 1981-1986. Methodology, demography and incident cases of first ever stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51:1373-80.
7. Wade DT, Langton Hewer R, Wood VA. Stroke: influence of patient's sex and side of weakness on outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:513-6.
8. Glass TA, Matchar DB, Belyea M, Feussner JR. Impact of social support on outcome in stroke. Stroke 1993;24:189-98.
9. Ween JE, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, Roberts M. Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 1996; 47:388-92.
10. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. Br Med J 1997;314:1151-9.
11. Anderson C. Baseline measures and outcome predictions. Neuroepidemiology 1994;13:283-9.
12. Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Outlook after an acute stroke: urinary incontinence and loss of consciousness compared in 532 patients. QJM 1985;56:601-91.
13. Goldstein LB, Matchar DB. Clinical assessment of stroke. JAMA 1994;271:1114-20.
14. Barer DH. Continence after stroke: useful predictor or goal of therapy? Age Ageing 1989;18:183-91.
15. Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Edmans JA, Walker MF, et al. The accuracy of prediction about progress of patients on a stroke unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:972-5.
16. Ween JE, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, Roberts M. Incontinence after stroke in a rehabilitation setting: outcome associations and predictive factors. Neurology 1996;47:659-63.
17. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials. Stroke 1997;28:2139-44.
18. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Warlow C. A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project 1981-1986. Incidence, case fatality rates and overall outcome at one year of cerebral infarction, primary intracerebral and subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:16-22.
19. Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kannel WB, Sytkowski P, et al. Factors influencing survival and need for institutionalisation following stroke: The Framingham Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:415-8.
20. Wade DT. Measuring health outcome in the NHS. 1998 (unpublished).