Ambient light working times of visible light-cured restorative materials. Does the ISO standard reflect clinical reality?

Dental Materials

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 353-357

  Lane, D Andrew ^a,b   Watts, David C ^a   Wilson, Nairn H F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYMER; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; LIGHT; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; EVALUATION STUDIES; LIGHT; POLYMERS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032151044     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00005-6     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Baum L, Phillips RW, Lund MR (1985). Textbook of Operative Dentistry. Philadelphia: Saunders. pp. 231.
2. ADA Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment (1985). Visible light-cured composites and activating units. J Am Dental Assoc, Jan, 110:100-102.
3. Dlugokiniski MD, Caughman WF, Rueggenberg FA (1998). Assessing the effect of extraneous light on photoactivated resin composites. J Am Dental Assoc, Aug, 129:1103-1109.
4. ISO (1991). Dental Resin-based Restorative Materials. ISO:4049.
5. Dionysopoulos P, Watts DC (1990). Sensitivity to ambient light of visible light-cured composites. J Oral Rehabilitation, 17:9-13.
6. Belmont IO5000 operating light specification sheet, ref. 9609MA. Takara Belmont (UK) Ltd. London, UK.
7. Dunn JR (1998). Direct composites in a contemporary restorative practice. Compend Cont Educ Dent. Mar, 19:271-278.