Chromosomal localization and syntheny analysis of some genes in swine, cattle, and sheep (artiodactyla)

Genetika

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 1200-1204

  Kuznetsov, S B ^a   Larkin, D M ^a   Kaftanovskaya, E M ^a   Ivanova, E V ^a   Astakhova, N M ^a   Cheryaukene, O V ^a   Zhdanova, N S ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHROMOSOME MAP; EVOLUTION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; HUMAN; HYBRID CELL; MINK; SHEEP; SWINE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; EVOLUTION; GENETIC MARKERS; HUMANS; HYBRID CELLS; MINK; SHEEP; SWINE;

EID: 0032150279     PISSN: 00166758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Rettenberger G., Klett C., Zechner U. et al. Visualization of the conservation of synteny between humans and pigs by heterologous chromosomal painting // Genomics. 1995. V. 26. P. 372-378.
2. Comparative Genome Organization of Vertebrates. The First International Workshop on Comparative Genome organization // Mammalian Genome. 1996. V. 7. P. 717-734.
3. Mdanoaa H.C., YpMeHKoA.B., Fpadoe A.A. nojiyne-HH6 H XpOMOCOMHWÖ aHaJIHS VCTOfiHHBblX K 5-6pOM-AesoKCHypHflHHy KJICTOK KJiOHajibHoft Kyjibrypbi 3MepHKaHCKoft HopKH (Musteld vison) II l|HTOJionw. 1984. T.25.C. 177-181.
4. Zhdanova N.S., Tomsen P.D.,Astakhova N.M. et al. Production of pig-mink cell hybrids with single pig chromosomes 2,5, 12 or t( 1.13) // Mammalian Genome. 1996. V. 7. P. 613-615.
5. Zhdanova N.S., Tomsen P.D., Plyusnina E.V. et al. Partial collection of pig-mink cell hybrids with singke pig chromosomes //Arch. Zoot. 1996. V. 45. P. 367-370.
6. Zhdanova N.S., Astakhova N.M., Kuznetsov S.B. et al. Characterization of pig-mink cell hybrids: assignement
7. of the TK1 and UMPH2 genes to pig chromosome 12 // Mammalian Genome. 1994. V 5. P. 781-784.
8. Manchenko G.P. Handbook of Detection of Enzymes on Electrophoretic Gels. CRC Press, 1994. 342 p.
9. O'Brien S..I., Peters J., Searle A. et al. Report of the committee on comparative gene mapping //Genome Priority Reports. 1993. V. 1. P. 758-809.
10. O'Brien S.J., Womack. J., Lynos L.A. et al. Anchored reference loci for comparative genome mapping in mammals // Nature Genet. 1993. V. 3. P. 103-111.
11. Goureau A., Yerle M., Schmilz A. et al. Determination of correspondences between human and porcine chromosome segments using bidirectional chromosome painting // Genomics. 1996. V. 36. P. 252-262.
12. Rettenberger G., Bruch .J., Beatie C.W. et al. Chomosomal assignments of seventeen porcine microsàtellites and genes by use of somatic cell hybrid mapping panel // Animal Genet. 1995. V. 26. P. 1-5.
13. Kaftanovskaya HM., Serov O.L. High-resolution GTG-banded chromosomes of cattle, sheep, and goat: a comparative study in. Hered. 1994. V. 85. P. 395-400.
14. Silva A.J., Frankland P.W., Marowitz Z. et al. A mouse model for the learning and memory deficits associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 // Nature Genet. 1997. V. 15. P. 281-284.
15. Womack J.R. The bovine gene map: a tool for comparative candidate positional cloning: 12th European Colloquium on cytogenetics of domestic animal // Arch. Zoot. 1996. V. 45. P. 151-164.