The effects of discussion on eyewitness memory

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 17, 1998, Pages 1637-1648

  Yarmey, A Daniel ^a   Morris, Shaena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032148401     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01693.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alper, A., Buckhout, R., Chern, S., Harwood, R., & Slomovits, M. (1976). Eyewitness identification: Accuracy of individual vs. composite recollections of a crime. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 147-149.
2. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691-695.
4. Champion, D. J. (1981). Basic statistics for social research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
5. Clark, N. K., & Stephenson, G. M. (1989). Group remembering. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence: New perspectives (pp. 357-391). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Clark, N. K., Stephenson, G. M., & Kniveton, B. H. (1990). Social remembering: Quantitative aspects of individual and collaborative remembering by police officers and students. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 73-94.
7. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 281-290.
8. Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., & Davies, G. M. (1980). The deterioration of verbal descriptions of faces over different delay intervals. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 8, 101-106.
9. Heaton-Armstrong, A. (1985). Police officers' notebook. Criminal Law Review, 781-784.
10. Heaton-Armstrong, A. (1987). Police officers' notebooks: Recent developments. Criminal Law Review, 470-472.
11. Hilgendorf, E. L., & Irving, B. L. (1978). False positive identification. Medical Science and Law, 18, 255-262.
12. Hollin, C. R., & Clifford, B. R. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: The effects of discussion on recall accuracy and agreement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 234-244.
13. Levine, F. J., & Tapp, J. L. (1973). The psychology of criminal identification: The gap from Wade to Kirby. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 5, 1079-1131.
14. Levine, F. J., & Tapp, J. L. (1982). Eyewitness identification: Problems and pitfalls. In V. J. Konecni & E. B. Ebbesen (Eds.), The criminal justice system: A social-psychological analysis (pp. 99-127). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
15. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., & Fulford, J. A. (1991). Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 741-745.
16. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., Nosworthy, G. J., Fulford, J. A., Hector, J., LeVan, V., & Seabrook, C. (1991). Biased lineups: Sequential presentation reduces the problem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 796-802.
17. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
18. Loftus, E. F. (1992). When a lie becomes memory's truth: Memory distortion after exposure to misinformation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 121-123.
19. Meudell, P. R., Hitch, G. J., & Boyle, M. M. (1995). Collaboration in recall: Do pairs of people cross-cue each other to produce new memories? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 141-152.
20. Meudell, P. R., Hitch, G. J., & Kirby, P. (1992). Are two heads better than one? Experimental investigations of the social facilitation of memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 525-543.
21. Stephenson, G. M. (1990). Should collaborative testimony be permitted in courts of law? Criminal Law Review, 302-314.
22. Stephenson, G. M., Brandstaetter, H., & Wagner, W. (1983). An experimental study of social performance and delay on the testimonial validity of story recall. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 175-191.
23. Stephenson, G. M., Clark, N. K., & Kniveton, B. (1989). Collaborative testimony by police officers: A psycho-legal issue. In H. Wegener, F. Losel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 254-270). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
24. Stephenson, G. M., Clark, N. K., & Wade, G. S. (1986). Meetings make evidence? An experimental study of collaborative and individual recall of a simulated police interrogation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1113-1122.
25. Stephenson, G. M., & Wagner, W. (1989). Origins of the misplaced confidence effect in collaborative recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 227-236.
26. Underwood, G., & Milton, H. (1993). Collusion after a collision: Witnesses' reports of a road accident with and without discussion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 11-22.
27. Warnick, D. H., & Sanders, G. S. (1980). The effects of group discussion on eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 249-259.
28. Wells, G. L., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1985). Methodological notes on the accuracy-confidence relationship in eyewitness identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 413-419.
29. Wells, G. L., Seelau, E. P., Rydell, S. M., & Luus, C. A. E. (1994). Recommendations for properly conducted lineup identification tasks. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony (pp. 223-244). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30. Yarmey, A. D. (1992). The effects of dyadic discussion on earwitness recall. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 251-263.