Helical protein design

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 350-353

  Schafmeister, Christian E ^a   Stroud, Robert M ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0032146407     PISSN: 09581669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0958-1669(98)80006-2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Dill KA, Chan HS. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat Struct Biol. 4:1997;10-19.
2. Struthers MD, Cheng RP, Imperiali B. Design of a monomeric 23-residue polypeptide with defined tertiary structure. Science. 271:1996;342-345.
3. Raleigh DP, Betz SF, DeGrado WF. A de novo designed protein mimics the native state of natural proteins. J Am Chem Soc. 117:1995;7558-7559.
4. Schafmeister CE, LaPorte SL, Miercke LJ, Stroud RM. A designed four helix bundle protein with native-like structure. Nat Struct Biol. 4:1997;1039-1046.
5. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection [see comments]. Science. 278:1997;82-87.
6. Chothia C. Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins. Nature. 248:1974;338-339.
7. Dill KA. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 29:1990;7133-7155.
8. Padmanabhan S, Marqusee S, Ridgeway T, Laue TM, Baldwin RL. Relative helix-forming tendencies of nonpolar amino acids. Nature. 344:1990;268-270.
9. O'Neil KT, DeGrado WF. A thermodynamic scale for the helix-forming tendencies of the commonly occuring amino acids. Science. 250:1990;646-650.
10. Kabsch W, Sander C. On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 81:1984;1075-1078.
11. Argos P. Analysis of sequence-similar pentapeptides in unrelated protein tertiary structures. J Mol Biol. 197:1987;331-348.
12. Cohen BI, Presnell SR, Cohen FE. Origins of structural diversity within sequentially identical hexapeptides. Protein Sci. 2:1993;2134-2145.
13. Minor DL Jr, Kim PS. Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence. Nature. 380:1996;730-734.
14. Eisenberg D, Wilcox W, Eshita SM, Pryciak PM, Ho SP, DeGrado WF. The design synthesis and crystallization of an alpha-helical peptide. Proteins - Struct Funct Genet. 1:1986;16-22.
15. Regan L, DeGrado WF. Characterization of a helical protein designed from first principles. Science. 241:1988;976-978.
16. Hill CP, Anderson DH, Wesson L, DeGrado WF, Eisenberg D. Crystal structure of α1: implications for protein design. Science. 249:1990;543-546.
17. Handel TM, Williams SA, DeGrado WF. Metal ion-dependent modulation of the dynamics of a designed protein. Science. 261:1993;879-885.
18. Hecht MH, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, Ogden RC. De novo design expression and characterization of Felix: a four-helix bundle protein of native-like sequence. Science. 249:1990;884-891.
19. Kamtekar S, Schiffer JM, Xiong H, Babik JM, Hecht MH. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids [see comments]. Science. 262:1993;1680-1685.
20. Roy S, Ratnaswamy G, Boice JA, Fairman R, McLendon G, Hecht MH. A protein designed by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids displays native-like properties. J Am Chem Soc. 119:1997;5302-5306.
21. Crick FHC. The packing of α-helices: simple coiled-coils. Acta Crystallogr. 6:1953;689.
22. Schafmeister CE, Miercke LJ, Stroud RM. Structure at 2.5 Å of a designed peptide that maintains solubility of membrane proteins. Science. 262:1993;734-738.
23. Harbury PB, Zhang T, Kim PS, Alber T. A switch between two-, three- and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants. Science. 262:1993;1401-1407.
24. Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins. Protein Sci. 4:1995;2006-2018.
25. Lazar GA, Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. De novo design of the hydrophobic core of ubiquitin. Protein Sci. 6:1997;1167-1178.
26. Dahiyat BI, Sarisky CA, Mayo SL. De novo protein design: towards fully automated sequence selection. J Mol Biol. 273:1997;789-796.
27. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:1997;10172-10177.
28. Dahiyat BI, Gordon DB, Mayo SL. Automated design of the surface positions of protein helices. Protein Sci. 6:1997;1333-1337.
29. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. Protein design automation. Protein Sci. 5:1996;895-903.
30. Desmet J, Demaeyer M, Hazes B, Lasters I. The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning. Nature. 356:1992;539-542.
31. Brunet AP, Huong ES, Huffine ME, Loeb JE, Weltman RJ, Hecht MH. The role of turns in the structure of an alpha-helical protein. Nature. 364:1993;355-358.
32. MacBeath G, Kast P, Hilvert D. Exploring sequence constraints on an interhelical turn using in vivo selection for catalytic activity. Protein Sci. 7:1998;325-335.
33. MacBeath G, Kast P, Hilvert D. Redesigning enzyme topology by directed evolution. Science. 279:1998;1958-1961.
34. Nagi AD, Regan L. An inverse correlation between loop length and stability in a four-helix-bundle protein. Fold Des. 2:1997;67-75.
35. Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of (alpha) helices. Science. 240:1988;1648-1652.
36. Robertson DE, Farid RS, Moser CC, Urbauer JL, Mulholland SE, Pidikiti R, Lear JD, Ward AJ, DeGrado WF, Dutton PL. Design and synthesis of multi-haem proteins. Nature. 368:1994;425-432.
37. Rojas NR, Kamtekar S, Simons CT, McLean JE, Vagel KM, Spiro TG, Farid RS, Hecht MH. De novo heme proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Protein Sci. 6:1997;2512-2524.
38. Quéméneur E, Moutiez M, Charbonnier J-B, Ménez A. Engineering cyclophilin into a proline-specific endopeptidase. Nature. 391:1998;301-304.