Factors affecting clinical outcome following endoscopic perforator vein ablation

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 176, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 162-167

  Rhodes, Jeffrey M ^a   Gloviczki, Peter ^a   Canton, Linda G ^a   Rooke, Thom ^a   Lewis, Bradley D ^a   Lindsey, John R ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LEG ULCER; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULCER HEALING;

ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LEG ULCER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VEINS; VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY;

EID: 0032142966     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00169-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. 1. Gloviczki P, Yao JST, eds. Preface. Handbook of Venous Disorders: Guidelines of the American Venous Forum. London: Chapman & Hall; 1996.
2. 2. Linton RR. The communicating veins of the lower leg and the operative technic for their ligation. Ann Surg. 1938;107:582-593.
3. 3. DePalma RG. Linton's operation and modifications of the open technique. In: Gloviczki P, Bergan JJ, eds. Atlas of Endoscopic Perforator Vein Surgery. 1st ed. London: Springer-Verlag; 1998;107-113.
4. 4. Gloviczki P, Cambria RA, Rhee RY, et al. Surgical technique and preliminary results of endoscopic subfascial division of perforating veins. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:517-523.
5. 5. Gloviczki P, Bergan JJ, Menawat SS, et al. Safety, feasibility, and early efficacy of subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery: a preliminary report from the North American registry. J Vasc Surg. 1997; 25:94-105.
6. 6. Mayberry JC, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, Porter JM. Fifteen-year results of ambulatory compression therapy for chronic venous ulcers. Surgery. 1991;109:575-581.
7. 7. Pierik EGJM, vanUrk H, Hop WCJ, Wittens CHA. Endoscopic versus open subfascial division of incompetent perforating veins in the treatment of venous leg ulceration: a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:1049-1054.
8. 8. Porter JM, Moneta GL, and the International Consensus Committee on Chronic Venous Disease. Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:634-645.
9. 9. Nicolaides AN, Bergan JJ, Eklof B, et al. Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs: a consensus statement. In: Gloviczki P, Yao JST, eds. Handbook of Venous Disorders: Guidelines of the American Venous Forum. London: Chapman & Hall; 1996:652-660.
10. 10. Bergan JJ, Murray J, Greason K. Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery: a preliminary report. Ann Vasc Surg. 1996;10: 211-219.
11. 11. Padberg FT, Pappas PJ, Araki CT, et al. Hemodynamic and clinical improvement after superficial vein ablation in primary combined venous insufficiency with ulceration. J Vasc Surg. 1996; 24:711-718.
12. 12. Raju S, Fredricks R. Venous obstruction: an analysis of one hundred thirty-seven cases with hemodynamic, venographic, and clinical correlations. J Vasc Surg. 1991;14:305-313.
13. 13. Pierik EGJM, Toonder IM, van Urk H, Wittens CHA. Validation of duplex ultrasonography in detecting competent and incompetent perforating veins in patients with venous ulceration of the lower leg. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:49-52.
14. 14. Mozes G, Gloviczki P, Menawat SS, et al. Surgical anatomy for endoscopic subfascial division of perforating veins. J Vasc Surg. 1996;24:800-808.