Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: Is proximity concord syntactic or linear?

Cognition

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 1998, Pages

  Vigliocco, Gabriella ^a   Nicol, Janet ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agreement errors; Grammatical encoding; Language production

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION TREE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PERSONALITY TEST; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DECISION TREES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LINEAR MODELS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS; WORD ASSOCIATION TESTS;

EID: 0032134488     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00041-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bock, J.K., 1982. Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 89, 1-47.
2. Bock, J.K., 1986. Meaning, sound, and syntax: lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 12, 575-586.
3. Bock, J.K., Cutting, J.C., 1992. Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 99-127.
4. Bock, J.K., Eberhard, K.M., 1993. Meaning sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 57-99.
5. Bock, J.K., Miller, C.A., 1991. Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology 23, 35-43.
6. Bock, J.K., Warren, R.K., 1985. Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition 21, 47-67.
7. Chomsky, N., 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.
8. De Smedt, K.J., 1990. IPF: An incremental parallel formulator. In: R. Dale, C. Mellish, M. Zock (Eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation. Academic Press, London, pp. 167-192.
9. Eberhard, K., 1997. The marked effect of number on subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language 36, 147-164.
10. Fayol, M., Largy, P., Lemaire, P., 1994. When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors: a study in French written language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (2), 437-464.
11. Garrett, M.F., 1976. Syntactic processes in sentence production. In: R. Wales, E. Walker (Eds.), New Approaches to Language Mechanisms. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
12. Garrett, M.F., 1980. Levels of processing in sentence production. In: B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production, Vol. 1, Speech and Talk. Academic Press, London.
13. Garrett, M.F., 1993. Errors and their relevance for models of language production. In: G. Blanken, J. Dittman, H. Grim, J. Marshall, C. Wallesch (Eds.), Linguistic Disorders and Pathologies, de Gruyter, Berlin.
14. Gazdar, G., Pullum, G.K., 1981. Subcategorization, constituent order and the notion of 'head'. In: M. Mortgat, H. vd Hulst, T. Hoekstra (Eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules. Foris, Dordrecht.
15. Hartsuiker, R.J., Kolk, H.H.J., Huiskamp, P., 1998. Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, in press.
16. Jespersen, O., 1924. The philosophy of grammar. Allen and Unwin, London.
17. Kempen, G., Hoenkamp, E., 1987. Incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science 11, 201-258.
18. Kempen, G., Vosse, T., 1989. Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: a cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing. Connection Science 1, 275-292.
19. Levelt, W.J.M., 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Meyer, A.S., 1996. Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 477-496.
21. Pollard, C., Sag, I.A. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J., 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. Longman, London.
23. Schriefers, H., 1992. Lexical access in the production of noun phrases. Cognition 45, 33-54.
24. Stemberger, J.P., 1982. Syntactic errors in speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11, 313-345.
25. Stemberger, J.P., 1985. An interactive activation model of language production. In: A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language. Erlbaum, London, pp. 143-186.
26. Strang, B.M.H., 1966. Some features of S-V concord in present day English. In: I. Cellini, G. Melchiori (Eds.), English Studies Today: Fourth series. Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, Rome, pp. 73-87.
27. Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., Semenza, C., 1995. Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: the role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 186-215.
28. Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., Garrett, M.F. 1996a. Subject-Verb agreement in Spanish and English: differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition 61, 261-298.
29. Vigliocco, G., Hartsuiker, R.J., Jarema, G., Kolk, H.H.J., 1996b. How many labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French. Language and Cognitive Processes 11, 407-421.
30. Zandvoort, R.W., 1961. Varia syntactica. Language and Society: Essays presented to Arthur M. Jensen on his Seventieth Birthday. Det Berlingske Bogtrykkeri, Copenhagen.