|
Volumn 23, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 500-515
|
Judging who should live: Schneiderman and Jecker on the duty not to treat
|
Author keywords
Medical benefit; Medical futility; Patient autonomy; Qualitative futility; Quantitative futility
|
Indexed keywords
ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
ARTICLE;
BENEFICENCE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
HUMAN;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
PATIENT ABANDONMENT;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONHOOD;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
TERMINAL CARE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
BENEFICENCE;
COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES;
HUMANS;
MEDICAL FUTILITY;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONHOOD;
REFUSAL TO TREAT;
SOCIAL VALUES;
TERMINAL CARE;
VALUE OF LIFE;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0032130063
PISSN: 03605310
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1076/jmep.23.5.500.2565 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (12)
|