One-year outcomes of project towards no drug abuse

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 632-642

  Sussman, Steve ^a   Dent, Clyde W ^a   Stacy, Alan W ^a   Craig, Sande ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug abuse prevention

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; DRUG ABUSE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032127553     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0338     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Newcomb M D, Bentler P M. Substance use and abuse among children and teenagers. Am Psychol. 44:1989;242-248.
2. Eggert L L, Thompson E A, Herting J R, Nicholas L J, Dicker B G. Preventing adolescent drug abuse and high school dropout through an intensive school-based social network development program. Am J Health Promot. 8:1994;202-215.
3. Sussman S, Simon T R, Glynn S, Stacy A W. What does "high risk" mean? A psycINFO scan of the literature. Behav Ther. 27:1996;53-65.
4. Hawkins J D, Catalano R F, Miller J Y. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance use prevention. Psychol Bull. 112:1992;64-105.
5. Johnson C A, Pentz M A, Weber M D, Dwyer J H, Baer N, MacKinnon D P, Hansen W B, Flay B R. Relative effectiveness of comprehensive community programming for drug abuse prevention with high-risk and low-risk adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol. 58:1990;447-456.
6. Sussman S. Development of a drug abuse prevention curriculum for high risk youth. J Psychoactive Drugs. 28:1996;169-182.
7. DeMoor C, Johnston D A, Werden D L, Elder J P, Senn K, Whitehorse L. Patterns and correlates of smoking and smokeless tobacco use among continuation high school students. Addict Behav. 19:1994;175-184.
8. Newcomb M D, Maddahian E, Skager R, Bentler P M. Substance abuse and psychosocial risk factors among teenagers: associations with sex, age, ethnicity, and type of school. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 13:1987;413-433.
9. Sussman S, Dent C W, Burton D, Stacy A W, Flay B R. Developing school-based tobacco use prevention and cessation programs. 1995;Sage, Thousand Oaks.
10. Simon T R, Stacy A W, Sussman S, Dent C W. Sensation seeking and drug use among high risk Latino and Anglo adolescents. Pers Individ Differ. 17:1994;1083-1090.
11. Tobler N S. Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: quantitative outcomes results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. J Drug Issues. 15:1986;535-567.
12. Hansen W B. School-based substance abuse prevention: a review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980-1990. Health Educ Res Theor Pract. 7:1992;403-430.
13. Hansen W B, Johnson C A, Flay B R, Graham J W, Sobel J. Affective and social influences approaches to the prevention of multiple substance abuse among seventh grade students: results from Project SMART. Prev Med. 17:1988;135-154.
14. Graham J W, Johnson C A, Hansen W B, Flay B R, Gee M. Drug use prevention programs, gender, and ethnicity: evaluation of three seventh-grade Project SMART cohorts. Prev Med. 19:1990;305-313.
15. Ellickson P L, Bell R M. Drug prevention in junior high: a multi-site longitudinal test. Science. 247:1990;1299-1305.
16. Dishion T J, Andrews D W. Preventing escalation in problem behaviors with high-risk young adolescents: immediate and 1-year outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol. 63:1995;538-548.
17. Boylan M. Summary of findings of substance abuse prevention programming at Sierra Vista High School. 1991;Sierra Vista High School, Dinuba.
18. DeJong J A. An approach for high risk prevention research. Drugs Soc. 8:1995;125-138.
19. Eggert L L. Psychosocial approaches in prevention science: facing the challenge with high risk youth. Commun Nurs Res. 29:1996;73-85.
20. Lorion R P, Ross J G. Programs for change: a realistic look at the nation's potential for preventing substance involvement among high-risk youth. J Community Psychol OSAP Special Issue. 1992;3-9.
21. Richards C N, McKenzie P, Newton R R. Project Success: comprehensive intervention services for middle school high-risk youth. J Adolesc Res. 11:1996;130-163.
22. St Pierre T L, Kaltreider D L, Mark M M, Aikin K J. Drug prevention in a community setting: a longitudinal study of the relative effectiveness of a three-year primary prevention program in Boys & Girls Clubs across the nation. Am J Community Psychol. 20:1992;673-705.
23. Swisher J D, Hu T W. Alternatives to drug abuse: some are and some are not. Preventing adolescent drug abuse: intervention strategies. 1983;NIDA, Rockville.
24. Wiener R L, Pritchard C, Frauenhoffer S M, Edmonds M. Evaluation of a drug-free schools and community program. Eval Rev. 17:1993;488-503.
25. Miller, W, R, Rollnick, S, Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behavior, New York, Guilford, 1991.
26. Nezami, E, Sussman, S. Motivation in tobacco use cessation research.
27. Prochaska J O, DiClemente C C. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 51:1983;390-395.
28. Sussman S, Dent C W, Stacy A W. The relations of pro-drug use myths with self-reported drug use among youth at continuation high schools. J Appl Soc Psychol. 26:1996;2014-2037.
29. Sussman S, Galaif E R, Pentz M A, Hennesy M, Craig S, Moss M A, Stacy A W, Dent C W. Implementation and process evaluation of a "school-as-community" group: a component of a school-based drug abuse prevention program. Eval Rev. 21:1997;94-123.
30. Dent C W, Sussman S, Hennesy M, Craig S, Moss M A, Stacy A W. Implementation, process, and immediate outcomes evaluation of the Project Towards No Drug Abuse classroom program for high risk youth. J Drug Educ. 28:1998.
31. Graham J W, Flay B R, Johnson C A, Hansen W B, Grossman L M, Sobel J L. Reliability of self-report measures of drug use in prevention research: evaluation of the Project SMART questionnaire via the test-retest reliability matrix. J Drug Educ. 14:1984;175-193.
32. Dent C W, Sussman S, Stacy A W. The impact of written parental consent policy on estimates from a school based drug use survey. Eval Rev. 21:1997;698-712.
33. MacKinnon D P, Johnson C A, Pentz M A, Dwyer D P, Hansen W B. Mediating mechanisms in a school-based drug prevention program: first year effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project. Health Psychol. 10:1991;164-172.
34. Sussman, S, Dent, C, W, Severson, H, H, Burton, D, Flay, B, R, Self-initiated quitting among smokers at continuation and compre hensive high schools, Prev Med.
35. Sussman S, Dent C W, Brannon B R, Glowacz K M, Gleason L R, Hansen W B, Johnson C A, Flay B R. The Television, School, and Family Smoking Prevention/Cessation Project, IV. Controlling for program success expectancies across experimental and control conditions. Addict Behav. 14:1989;601-610.
36. Lau R R, Hartman K A, Ware J E. Health as a value: methodological and theoretical considerations. Health Psychol. 5:1986;25-43.
37. Hansen W B, Tobler N S, Graham J W. Attrition in substance abuse research: a meta-analysis of 85 longitudinally followed cohorts. Eval Rev. 14:1990;677-685.
38. Elder J P, Woodruff S I, Eckhardt L. Participation in a telephone-based tobacco use prevention program for adolescents. Am J Health Promot. 9:1994;92-95.
39. Miller D C. Handbook of research design and social measurement. 1991;Newbury Park, Sage.
40. LoSciuto L, Aquilino W S, Licari F C. Interviewing minority youth about drug use: telephone vs. in-person surveys. De La Rosa M R, Adrados J-L R. Drug abuse among minority youth: advances in research and methodology. 1993;NIDA, Rockville.
41. Kaplan C P, Tanjasiri S P. The effects of interview mode on smoking attitudes and behavior: self-report among female Latino adolescents. Subst Use Misuse. 31:1996;947-963.
42. Murray D M, Moskowitz J M, Dent C W. Design and analysis issues in community-based drug abuse prevention. Am Behav Sci. 39:1996;853-867.
43. Murray D M, Hannan P J. Planning for the appropriate analysis in school-based drug-use prevention studies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 58:1990;458-468.
44. Levanthal H, Keeshan K. Millstein S G, Peterson A C, Nightingale E O. Promoting healthy alternatives to substance abuse. Promoting the health of adolescents: new directions for the twenty-first century. 1993;New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
45. Johnston L D, O'Malley P M, Bachman J G. National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1993. 1994;USDHHS, Rockville.
46. Sussman S, Stacy A W, Dent C W, Simon T R, Johnson C A. Marijuana use: current issues and new research directions. J Drug Issues. 26:1996;693-726.
47. Newcomb M D, Bentler P M. Consequences of adolescent drug use: impact on the lives of young adults. 1988;Sage, Beverly Hills.