Learning differential diagnosis of erythemato-squamous diseases using voting feature intervals

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 147-165

  Güvenir, H Altay ^a   Demiröz, Gülşen ^a,c   Ilter, Nilsel ^b  

^a BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c MICROSOFT   (United States)

Author keywords

Differential diagnosis; Erythemato squamous; Machine learning; Voting feature intervals

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES;

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; VOTING FEATURE INTERVALS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ERYTHEMATOSQUAMOUS SKIN DISEASE; LEARNING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; SKIN DISEASES, PAPULOSQUAMOUS;

EID: 0032127185     PISSN: 09333657     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0933-3657(98)00028-1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aha DW, Kibler D, Albert MK Instance-Based Learning Algorithms. Mach Learn. 6:1991;37-66.
2. Akkuş A, Güvenir HA. K Nearest Neighbor classification on Feature Projections. In: Proc. ICML' 96, 1995:12-19.
3. Almnallim H, Dietterich TG Learning boolean concepts in the presence of many irrelevant features. Artif Intell. 69:1994;279-305.
4. Cost S, Salzberg S A Weighted Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Learning with Symbolic Features. Mach Learn. 10:1993;57-78.
5. Demiröz G, Güvenir HA. Genetic Algorithms to Learn Feature Weights for the Nearest Neighbor Algorithm. In: Proc BENELEARN-96, 1996:117-126.
6. Demiröz G, Güvenir HA. Classification by Voting Feature Intervals. In: Proc 9th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML-97). Berlin: Springer, LNAI 1224, 1997:85-92.
7. Forsström J, Eklund P, Virtanen H, Waxlax J, Lähbdevirta J DIAGAID: a connectionist approach to determine the diagnostic value of clinical data. Artif Intell Med. 3:1991;193-201.
8. Güvenir HA, Şirin I. Classification by Feature Partitioning. Mach Learn. 23:1996;47-67.
9. Holte RC Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Mach Learn. 11:1993;63-91.
10. Kononenko I Inductive and Bayesian Learning in Medical Diagnosis. Appl Artif Intell. 7:1993;317-337.
11. Kononenko I, Bratko I Information-Based Evaluation Criterion for classifier's Performance. Mach Learn. 6:1991;67-80.
12. Liu H, Setino R. A probabilistic approach to feature selection - A filter solution. In: 13th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'96), 1996:319-327.
13. Lopez B, Plaza E Case-based learning of plans and goal states in medical diagnosis. Artif Intell Med. 6:1997;29-60.
14. Quinlan JR. Unknown attribute values in induction. In: Proc 6th International Workshop on Machine Learning, 1989:164-168.
15. Spackman AK. Learning Categorical Decision Criteria in Biomedical Domains. In: Proc 5th International Conference on Machine Learning. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1988:36-46.