The neuroethology of frequency preferences in the spring peeper

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 55-69

  Schwartz, Joshua J ^a   Gerhardt, H Carl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANURA; PSEUDACRIS CRUCIFER;

EID: 0032127101     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0737     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Andersson M. Sexual Selection. 1994;Princeton University Press. Princeton.
2. Berger R. L. More powerful tests from confidence intervalp-. American Statistician. 50:1996;314-318.
3. Berger R. L., Boos D. D. P. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 89:1994;1012-1016.
4. Brenowitz E. A., Rose G. J. Behavioural plasticity mediates aggression in choruses of the pacific treefrog. Animal Behaviour. 47:1994;633-641.
5. Brenowitz E. A., Wilczynski W., Zakon H. H. Acoustic communication in spring peepers. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 155:1984;585-592.
6. Capranica R. R. The untuning of the tuning curve: is it time. Seminars in Neuroscience. 4:1992;401-408.
7. Capranica R. R., Moffat A. J. M. Neurobehavioral correlates of sound communication in anurans. Advances in Vertebrate Neuroethology. 1983;Plenum Press. New York. p. 710-730.
8. Chamberlin H. Musical Applications of Microprocessors. 2nd edn. 1985;Haydon Book. Hasbrouck Heights.
9. Costalupes J. A. Representation of tones in the responses of auditory fibers in cats. I. Comparison with detection thresholds. Journal of Neuroscience. 5:1985;3261-3269.
10. Darwin C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. 1st edn. 1871;Murray. London.
11. Diekamp B. M., Gerhardt H. C. Midbrain auditory sensitivity in the spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 171:1992;245-250.
12. Diekamp B. M., Gerhardt H. C. Selective phonotaxis to advertisement calls in the gray treefrogHyla versicolor. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 177:1995;173-190.
13. Doherty J. A., Gerhardt H. C. Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the spring peeper (Hyla crucifer. Animal Behaviour. 32:1984;875-881.
14. Dye R. H., Hafter E. R. Just-noticeable differences of frequency for masked tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 67:1980;1746-1753.
15. Ehret G., Gerhardt H. C. Auditory masking and effects of noise on responses of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea. Journal of Comparative Physiology. 141:1980;13-18.
16. Forester D. C., Czarnowsky R. Sexual selection in the spring peeper,Hyla crucifer. Behaviour. 92:1985;112-128.
17. Freedman E. G., Ferragamo M., Simmons A. M. Masking patterns in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 84:1988;2081-2091.
18. Gerhardt H. C. Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads. Journal of Comparative Physiology. 102:1975;1-12.
19. Gerhardt H. C. Evolutionary and neurobiological impli-cations of selective phonotaxis in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea. Animal Behaviour. 35:1987;1479-1489.
20. Gerhardt H. C. Acoustic properties used in call recognition by frogs and toads. Fritszch B., Wilczynski W., Ryan M. J., Hetherington T., Walkowiak W. The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System. 1988;455-483 John Wiley. New York.
21. Gerhardt H. C. The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 25:1994a;293-324.
22. Gerhardt H. C. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrogHyla chrysoscelis. Animal Behaviour. 47:1994b;615-635.
23. Gerhardt H. C., Klump G. M. Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green treefrog: a limitation on mate choice. Animal Behaviour. 36:1988;1247-1249.
24. Gerhardt H. C., Schwartz J. J. Interspecific interactions in anuran courtship. Heatwole H., Sullivan B. K. Amphibian Biology. Vol 2. Social Behaviour. 1995;603-632 Surrey Beatty. Chipping Norton.
25. Gerhardt H. C., Diekamp B., Ptacek M. Inter-male spacing in choruses of the spring peeper,Pseudacris crucifer. Animal Behaviour. 38:1989;1012-1024.
26. Gerhardt H. C., Allan S., Schwartz J. J. Female green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 166:1990;791-794.
27. Hall J. C. Central processing of communication sounds in the anuran auditory system. American Zoologist. 34:1994;670-684.
28. Harris J. D. Masked DL for pitch memory. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 40:1966;43-46.
29. Henning G. B. Frequency discrimination in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 41:1966;774-777.
30. Henry W. R., Mulroy M. J. Afferent synaptic changes in auditory hair cells during noise-induced temporary threshold shift. Hearing Reserarch. 84:1995;81-90.
31. Hienz R. D., Sachs M. B., Aleszczyk C. M. Frequency discrimination in noise: comparison of cat performances with auditory-nerve models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 93:1993;462-469.
32. Kirkpatrick M., Ryan M. J. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 350:1991;33-38.
33. Lewis E. R., Henry K. R. Nonlinear effects of noise on phase-locked cochlear-nerve responses to sinusoidal stimuli. Hearing Research. 92:1995;1-16.
34. Lombard R. E., Straughan I. R. Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures. Journal of Experimental Biology. 61:1974;71-93.
35. Moore B. C. J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. 3rd edn. 1989;Academic Press. New York.
36. Moss C. F., Megala Simmons A. Frequency selectivity of hearing in the green treefrog,Hyla cinerea. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 159:1986;257-266.
37. Narins P. M. Coding of signals in noise by amphibian auditory nerve fibers. Hearing Research. 26:1987;145-154.
38. Narins P. M. Biological constraints on anuran acoustic communication: auditory capabilities of naturally behaving animals. Webster D. B., Fay R. R., Popper A. N. The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing. 1992;439-454 Springer-Verlag. New York.
39. Narins P. M., Hillery C. M. Frequency coding in the inner ear of anuran amphibians. Klinke R., Hartmann R. Hearing: Physiological Bases and Psychophysics. 1983;70-76 Springer-Verlag, New York.
40. Narins P. M., Zelick R. The effects of noise on auditory processing and behavior in amphibians. Fritszch B., Wilczynski W., Ryan M. J., Hetherington T., Walkowiak W. The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System. 1988;511-536 John Wiley. New York.
41. Narins P. M., Benedix J. H., Moss F. Does stochastic resonance play a role in hearing? Lewis E. R., Long G. R., Lyons R. F., Narins P. M., Steele C. R. Diversity in Auditory Mechanics. 1997;83-90 World Scientific. Singapore.
42. Patterson R. D., Moore B. C. J. Auditory filters and excitation patterns as representations of frequency resolution. Moore B. C. J. Frequency Selectivity in Hearing. 1986;123-177 Academic Press. New York.
43. Phillips D. P., Hall S. E. Spike-rate intensity functions of cat cortical neurons studied with combined tone-noise stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 80:1986;177-187.
44. Pickles J. O. The neurophysiological basis of frequency selectivity. Moore B. C. J. Frequency Selectivity in Hearing. 1986;51-121 Academic Press. New York.
45. Pickles J. O. An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing. 2nd edn. 1988;Academic Press. New York.
46. Rheinlander J., Gerhardt H. C., Yager D. D., Capranica R. R. Accuracy of phonotaxis by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea. Journal of Comparative Physiology. 133:1979;247-255.
47. Rhode W. S., Geisler C. D., Kennedy D. T. Auditory nerve fiber responses to wide-band noise and tone combinations. Journal of Neurophysiology. 41:1978;692-704.
48. Rose G. J., Brenowitz E. A. Aggressive thresholds of male pacific treefrogs for advertisement calls vary with amplitude of neighbor's calls. Ethology. 89:1991;244-252.
49. Ryan M. J. Mechanisms underlying sexual selection. Real L. A. Behavioral Mechanisms in Evolutionary Ecology. 1994;190-215 Chicago University Press. Chicago.
50. Ryan M. J., Keddy-Hector A. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. American Naturalist. 139 (Suppl.):1992;4-35.
51. Ryan M. J., Fox J. H., Wilczynski W., Rand A. S. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frogPhysalaemus pustulosus. Nature. 343:1990;66-67.
52. Ryan M. J., Perill S. A., Wilczynski W. Auditory tuning and call frequency predict population-based mating preferences in the cricket frog,Acris crepitans. American Naturalist. 139:1992;1370-1383.
53. Scharf B. Critical bands. Tobias J. V. Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory. Vol. 1. 1970;157-202 Academic Press. New York.
54. Schwartz J. J., Simmons A. M. Encoding of a spectrally complex natural call in the bullfrog's auditory nerve. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 166:1990;489-499.
55. Schwartz J. J., Wells K. D. The influence of background noise on the behavior of a neotropical treefrog,Hyla ebraccata. Herpetologica. 39:1983;121-129.
56. Simmons A. M., Buxbaum R. C. Neural codes for 'pitch' processing in a unique vertebrate auditory system. Moss C. F., Shettleworth S. J. Neuroethological Studies of Cognitive and Perceptual Processes. 1996;185-228 Westview Press. Boulder.
57. Simmons A. M., Schwartz J. J., Ferragamo M. Auditory nerve representation of a complex communication sound in background noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 91:1992;2831-2844.
58. Sullivan B. K., Ryan M. J., Verrell P. A. Female choice and mating system structure. Heatwole H., Sullivan B. K. Amphibian Biology. Vol 2. Social Behaviour. 1995;469-517 Surrey Beatty. Chipping Norton.
59. Telford S. R., Dyson M. L., Passmore N. I. Mate choice occurs only in small choruses of painted reed frogsHyperolius marmoratus. Bioacoustics. 2:1989;47-53.
60. Walkowiak W., Luksch H. Sensory motor interfacing in acoustic behavior of anurans. American Zoologist. 34:1994;685-695.
61. Wilczynski W. The nervous system. Feder M. E., Burggren W. W. Environmental Physiology of the Amphibians. 1992;9-39 Chicago University Press. Chicago.
62. Wilczynski W., Zakon H. H., Brenowitz E. A. Acoustic communication in spring peepers. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 155:1984;577-584.
63. Wilczynski W., McClelland B. E., Rand A. S. Acoustic, auditory, and morphological divergence in three species of neotropical frog. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 172:1993;425-438.
64. Wilczynski W., Rand A. S., Ryan M. J. The processing of spectral cues by the call analysis system of the túngara frog,Physalaemus pustulosus. Animal Behaviour. 49:1995;911-929.
65. Wollerman, L. 1995, Acoustic communication and acoustic interference in a neotropical frog,Hyla ebraccata, University of North Carolina.
66. Zakon H. H., Wilczynski W. The physiology of the anuran eighth nerve. Fritszch B., Wilczynski W., Ryan M. J., Hetherington T., Walkowiak W. The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System. 1988;125-155 John Wiley. New York.
67. Zwicker E. Masking and psychological excitation as consequences of the ear's frequency analysis. Plomp R., Smoorenberg G. F. Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing. 1970;376-394 Sijthoff, Leiden.