Frames of reference: A metaphor for analyzing and interpreting attitudes of environmental policy makers and policy influencers

Environmental Management

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 495-504

  Swaffield, Simon ^a  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Environmental policy analysis; Frames of reference; Metaphor; New Zealand high country

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY;

DECISION MAKING; PLANTS (BOTANY); PUBLIC POLICY;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC ATTITUDES;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; POLITICS; REVIEW; THEORY;

NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 0032125630     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002679900122     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Antaki, G. 1988. Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods. Sage, London.
2. Ashdown, M., and D. Lucas. 1987. Tussock grasslands: Landscape values and vulnerability. NZ Environment Council, Wellington.
3. Bardwell, L. 1991. Problem framing: A perspective on environmental problem solving. Environmental Management 15:603-612.
4. Barnes, T. J., and J. S. Duncan. 1992. Writing worlds: Discourse, text and metaphor in the representation of landscape. Routledge, London.
5. Belton, M. C. 1991. Forestry: A sustainable land use for degraded high country lands. New Zealand Forestry 36:19-22.
6. Boston, J. 1990. Restructuring the state: New Zealand's bureauera tic revolution. Oxford University Press, Auckland.
7. Buhrs, T., and R. Bartlett. 1993. Environmental policy in New Zealand. Oxford University Press, Auckland.
8. Clark, T. 1992. Practising natural resource management with a policy orientation. Environmental Management 16:423-433.
9. Cosgrove, D. 1985. Prospect, perspective and the evaluation of the landscape idea. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 10:45-62.
10. de Neufville, J., and S. E. Barton. 1987. Myths and the definition of policy problems. Policy Sciences 20:181-206.
11. Drysek, J. 1987. Discursive designs: Critical theory and political institutions. American Journal of Political Science 31:656-679.
12. Drysek, J. 1990. Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and political science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Eiser, J. R. 1986. Social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change. Polity Press, Cambridge.
15. Fairweather, J. R., and S. R. Swaffield. 1995. Preferences for land use options in the Mackenzie/Waitaki Basin. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 25:20-38.
16. Faludi, A. 1996. Framing with images. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23:93-108.
17. Fisher, F., and J. Forester (eds). 1993. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.
18. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. Harvester Press, Brighton.
19. Glazer, B. G., and A. L. Strauss, 1968. The discovery of grounded theory. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.
20. Goffman, E. 1986. Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. North Eastern University Press, Boston.
21. Habermas, J. 1979. Communication and the evolution of society. Beacon Press, Boston.
22. Healey, P. 1996. The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B23:217-234.
23. Jones, S. 1985a. Depth interviewing. Pages 45-55 in R. Walker (ed.), Applied qualitative research. Gower, Aldershot, UK.
24. Jones, S. 1985b. The analysis of depth interviews, Pages 56-70 in R. Walker (ed.), Applied qualitative research. Gower, Aldershot, UK.
25. Kelly, G. A. 1963. A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. Norton, New York.
26. Lakoff, G., and H. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago, Chicago.
27. Lasswell, H. D. 1970. The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Science 1:3-14.
28. Livingstone, D. 1995. The polity of nature: Representation, virtue, strategy. Ecumene 2:352-372.
29. Lucas, D. 1994. Identifying acceptable vegetation change in high country landscapes. Unpublished MLA thesis. Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.
30. Milbrath, L. 1985. Culture and the environment in the U.S. Environmental Management 9:161-172.
31. Miller, A. 1984/85. Psychosocial origins of conflict over pest control. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 12:235-251.
32. Molloy, B. 1963/64. Soil genesis and plant succession in the subalpine and alpine zones of the Torlesse Range, Canterbury, New Zealand. Parts I and II. New Zealand Journal of Botany 1:137-148; 2:143-176.
33. Molloy, B. 1963/64. Soil genesis and plant succession in the subalpine and alpine zones of the Torlesse Range, Canterbury, New Zealand. Parts I and II. New Zealand Journal of Botany 1:137-148; 2:143-176.
34. Novek, E. M. 1992. Read it and weep: How metaphor limits views of literacy. Discovered Society 3:219-223.
35. O'Connor, K. F. 1986. Roles for forestry in high country land use. Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Review 43:83-94.
36. O'Connor, K. F. 1993. Rural and mountain land use. Pages 146-149 in A. Memon and H. C. Perkins (eds.), Environmental Planning in New Zealand. Dunmore Press, Palmerston North.
37. O'Connor, K. F. 1994. High country land use: What are the issues in 1994? What relevance has forestry? New Zealand Forestry 38:2-4.
38. Potter, J., and M. Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and social psychology. Sage, London.
39. Rein, M. 1983. Value-critical policy analysis. Pages 83-112 in D. Callahan and B. Jennings (eds.), Ethics, the social sciences and policy analysis. Plenum Press, New York.
40. Rein, M., and D. Schön. 1986. Frame-reflective policy discourse. Beleidsanalyse 15:4-18.
41. Ricoeur, P. 1976. Interpretation theory. Texas Christian University Press, Fort Worth.
42. Schön, D. A. 1979. Generative metaphor: A perspective and problem setting in social policy. Pages 254-283 in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Silber, J. F. 1995, Space, fields, boundaries: The rise of spatial metaphors in contemporary sociological theory. Social Research 62:323-355.
44. Silverman, D. 1985. Qualitative methodology and sociology. Gower, London.
45. Stone, D. 1988. Policy, paradox and political reason. Scott Foreman, Glenview, Illinois.
46. Swaffield, S. R. 1993. Naming the rose: Observations on 'landscape' usage and professional identity. Landscape Research 18(2):58-65.
47. Swaffield, S. R. 1994. Attitudes towards trees: A case study in the New Zealand high country. New Zealand Forestry: 38:25-30.
48. Torgerson, D. 1980. Industrialisation and assessment. York University-McGraw-Hill, Toronto.
49. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453-458.
50. Walther, P. 1987. Against idealistic beliefs in the problem solving capacity of integrated resource management. Environmental Management 11:439-446.
51. Yanow, D. 1992a. Silences in public policy discourse: Organisational and policy myths. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory 2:399-423.
52. Yanow, D. 1992b. Supermarkets and culture clash: The epistemolqgical role of metaphors in administrative practice. The American Review of Public Administration 22:89-110.