Evaluation of plankton communities in small highly humic bog lakes in Latvia

Environment International

Volumn 24, Issue 5-6, 1998, Pages 595-602

  Druvietis, I ^a   Springe, G ^a   Urtane, L ^a   Klavins, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA   (Latvia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; BACTERIA; LAKES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PH;

BIODIVERSITY; HUMIC BOG LAKE; HUMIC SUBSTANCE; PHYTOPLANKTON; ZOOPLANKTON;

ECOSYSTEMS;

LAKE WATER;

BOG; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; HUMIC LAKE; PLANKTON;

BIOMASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; HUMIC SUBSTANCE; LAKE; LATVIA; NONHUMAN; PHYTOPLANKTON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WATER CONTAMINATION; ZOOPLANKTON;

LATVIA; TEICI STATE RESERVE;

EID: 0032125018     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0160-4120(98)00038-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Aizaki, M. Total number of bacteria as a trophic state index. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 22: 2732-2738; 1985.
2. APHA (American Public Health Association) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: APHA; 1988.
3. Andronikova, I.N. Limnotogical study of the Karelian east humus lakes - general characteristics of zooplankton. Praha: Academia Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences. 1986: 108-115.
4. Arvola, L.; Metsala, T.R.; Sim Rosk M. Phyto-and zooplankton in relation to water pH and humic content in small lakes in Southern Finland Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 24(1): 688-692; 1980.
5. Berzins, B.; Pejler B. Rotifer occurrence in relations to pH Hydrobiologia 147: 107-116; 1987.
6. Chrisman, T.L.; Schulze, R.L.; Brezonik, P.L.; Bloom, S.A. Acid precipitation: the biotic response in Florida lakes. Ecological impact of acid precipitation. 1980: 296-297.
7. Confer, J.L.; Kaaret, T. Zooplankton diversity and biomass in recently acidified lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40: 36-42; 1983.
8. Druvietis, I. Comparative studies on phytoplankton and periphyton in seven small lakes with different trophic state. Aqua Fennica 22(2): 143-151; 1992.
9. Druvietis, I. Phytoplankton periodicity in different in different state lakes in Latvia. In: Proc. Latvian Academy of Sciences. B.3/4: 98-100; 1995. Available from: Latvian Academy of Sciences.
10. Druvietis, I.; Urtane, L.; Springe, G.; Briede, A.; Klavins, M. In: Proc. University of Tsukuba, Studies on planktonic communities in small brown water lakes in Teici bog reserve, Latvia. Harmonizing human life with lakes, vol. 2: 856-859; 1995. Available from: University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba.
11. Havens, K.E.; Yan N.D.; Keller, W. Lake acidification: effects on crustacean zooplankton populations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27(8): 1621-1624; 1993.
12. Hessen, D.O.; Andersen, T.; Lyche, A. Differential grazing and resource utilization of zooplankton in a humic lake. Arch. Hydrobiol. 114: 321-347; 1989.
13. Heyman, U. Relations between production and biomass of phytoplankton in four Swedish lakes of different trophic status and humic content. Hydrologia 101: 89-104; 1983.
14. Jackson, T.A.; Hecky, R.E. Depression of primary productivity by humic matter in lake and reservoir waters of the boreal forest zone. Can. J. Fish. Aq. Sci. 37: 2300-2317; 1980.
15. James, M,R.; Salonen K. Zooplankton-phytoplankton interactiona and their importance in the phosphorus cycle of a polyhumic lake Arch. Hydrobiol. 123: 37-51; 1991.
16. Jones, J. The effect of environmental factors on estimated viable and total populations of planktonic bacteria in lakes and experimental enclosures. Freshwater Biol. 7: 67-91; 1977.
17. Jones, R.I.; Salonen, K.; De Haan, H. Phosphorus transformation in the epilimnion of humic lakes: abiotic interactions between dissolved humic materials and phosphate Freshwater Biol. 19: 357-367; 1988.
18. Klavins, M. Ecological roles of aquatic humic substances. In: Proc. of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. B. 1/2: 107-114; 1995. Available from: Latvian Academy of Sciences.
19. Nomals, P. Wetlands in Latvia Land. Nature. Folk of Latvia 259-321; 1936. (In Latvian)
20. Osborne, J.A.; Jansen, C. The zooplankton community in an acidic central Florida lake. Freshwater Biol. 8(1): 47-56; 1993.
21. Pejler, B. Regional-ecological studies of Swedish freshwater zooplankton Zool. Bid. Uppsala 36: 407-515; 1965.
22. Shaw, P.J.; de Haan, H.; Jones, R.I. The effect of acidification on abiotic interactions of dissolved humic substances, iron and phosphate in epilimnetic water from the humic Lake Skjervatjern. Environ. Int. 18: 577-588; 1992.
23. Sprules, W.G. Factors effecting the structure of limnetic crustacean zooplankton communities in central Ontario lakes. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 19: 635-643; 1975a.
24. Sprules, W.G. Midsummer crustacean zooplankton communities in acid stressed lakes. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, 32: 389-395; 1975b.
25. Thurman, E.M.; Malcolm, R.L. Preperative isolation of aquatic humic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15: 463-466.
26. Tranvik, L. Bacterioplankton growth on fractions of dissolved organic carbon of different molecular weights from humic and clear waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 1672-1677; 1990.
27. Tranvik, L. Effects of colloidal organic matter on the growth of bacteria and protists in lake water. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39 (6): 1276-1285; 1994.
28. Urtane, L.; Klavins, M. Zooplankton communities of a group of Lakes with different contents of humic substances. In: Proc. Latvian Academy of Sci. B. 1/2: 134-140; 1995. Available from: Latvian Academy of Sciences.
29. Wetzel, R. G. Limnology Philadelphia, PA: Saunders College Publishing; 1983.