Thermodynamic properties of novolac-type phenolic resin blended with poly (ethylene oxide)

Journal of Polymer Science, Part B: Polymer Physics

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 1647-1655

  Chu, Peter P ^a   Wu, Hew Der ^a,b   Lee, Chih Tsunc ^b  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

PCAM; PEO; Phenolic; Polymer blend; Thermodynamics

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITION EFFECTS; ENTHALPY; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; GIBBS FREE ENERGY; HYDROGEN BONDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PHENOLIC RESINS; POLYETHYLENE OXIDES; SPECIFIC HEAT OF SOLIDS; THERMAL EFFECTS; THERMODYNAMIC STABILITY;

PAINTER COLEMAN ASSOCIATION MODEL;

POLYMER BLENDS;

EID: 0032122705     PISSN: 08876266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19980730)36:10<1647::AID-POLB6>3.0.CO;2-M     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. D. J. Walsh and S. Rostami, Advances in Polymer Science, Vol. 72, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1985, p. 119.
2. M. M. Coleman, J. F. Graf, and P. C. Painter, Specific Interactions and the Miscibility of Polymer Blends, Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster, PA, 1991.
3. R. N. French, J. M. Machado, and D. Lin-Vien, Polymer, 33, 755 (1992).
4. D. R. Paul and J. W. Barlow, Polymer, 25, 487 (1984).
5. D. M. Teegarden and C. J. T. Landry, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys., 33, 1933 (1995).
6. M. M. Coleman, X. Yang, and P. C. Painter, Macromolecules, 25, 4414 (1992).
7. M. M. Coleman, C. J. Serman, D. E. Bahwagar, and P. C. Painter, Macromolecules, 22, 586 (1989).
8. E. Espi, M. Alberdi, M. J. Fernandez-Berridi, and J. J. Iruin, Polymer, 35, 3712 (1994).
9. C. J. Serman, P. C. Painter, and M. M. Coleman, Polymer, 32, 1049 (1991).
10. C. J. Serman, Y. Xu, P. C. Painter, and M. M. Coleman, Polymer, 32, 516 (1991).
11. E. Espi, M. Alberdi, and J. J. Iruin, Macromolecules, 26, 4586 (1993).
12. I. C. Sanchez and A. C. Balazs, Macromolecules, 22, 2325 (1989).
13. D. Patterson and A. Robard, Macromolecules, 11, 4, 690 (1978).
14. G. ten Brinke and F. E. Karasz, Macromolecules, 17, 81 (1984).
15. H. D. Wu, P. P. Chu, C. C. M. Ma, Polymer, 38, 21, 5419 (1997).
16. H. D. Wu, P. P. Chu, H. T. Tsing, and C. C. M. Ma, Macromolecules, 30, 5443 (1997).
17. P. P. Chu, H. D. Wu, and C. C. M. Ma, Macromolecules, 1997.
18. H. D. Wu, C. C. M. Ma, M. S. Li, Y. F. Su, and Y. D. Wu, Compos., Part A, Appl. Sci. Manuf., 8A, 895 (1997).
19. D. C. Ginnings and G. T. Furukawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 75, 522 (1953).
20. R. S. Drago, N. O'Bryan, and G. C. Vogel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92, 3924 (1970).
21. N. D. Coggesthall and E. L. Saier, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 5414 (1971).
22. C. S. Issac and C. B. Anna, Macromolecules, 22, 2325 (1989).
23. N. Hirai and H. Eyring, J. Polym. Sci., 37, 51 (1959).
24. D. Patterson Saint-Victor, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 35, 237 (1987).
25. R. S. Barnum, S. H. Goh, J. W. Barlow, and D. R. Paul, J. Polym. Sci, Polym. Lett. Ed., 23, 395 (1985).
26. "The average hydrogen bonding" means the total hydrogen bonding strength presents in this polymer blend that including the inter- and intra-hydrogen bonding contribution. From Figure 2, the PEO addition clearly increases the hydrogen bonding strength. It suggested that the average of hydrogen bonding of 30/70 phenolic/PEO is stronger than that of 20/80 blend.
27. H. D. Wu, P. P. Chu, C. T. Lee, and C. L. Lang, Macromolecules, 1997.
28. P. C. Painter, J. F. Graf, and M. M. Coleman, Macromolecules, 24, 5630 (1991).