Emergence and Categorization of Coordinated Visual Behavior Through Embodied Interaction

Autonomous Robots

Volumn 5, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 369-379

  Berthouze, Luc ^a,b,c,d,e,f   Kuniyoshi, Yasuo ^a,e,f,g,h  

^a ELECTROTECHNICAL LABORATORY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

^c Institute of Computer Science   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ D EVRY VAL D ESSONNE   (France)

^e Ministry of International Trade and Industry   (Japan)

^f Humanoid Interaction Lab   (Japan)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^h MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Emergent coordination; Feedback error learning; Foveated active vision; Oculomotor control; Sensorimotor memory

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER CONTROL SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; ROBOT LEARNING; ROBOTICS;

FEEDBACK-ERROR-LEARNING; FOVEATED ACTIVE VISION; OCULOMOTOR CONTROL; SENSORI-MOTOR MEMORY;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0032117109     PISSN: 09295593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008818608164     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bajcsy, R. and Campos, M. 1992. Active and exploratory perception. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 56(1):31-40.
2. Brown, C. 1988. The Rochester Robot Technical Report TR-257, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA.
3. Chow, M. and Teeter, J. 1994. An analysis of weight decay as a methodology of reducing three-layer feed-forward artificial neural networks for classification problems. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 600-605.
4. Coombs, D. 1992. Real-time gaze holding in binocular robot vision. Doctoral dissertation (also available as TR-415), Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA.
5. Gomi, H. and Kawato, M. 1993. Neural network control for a closed-loop system using feedback-error-learning. Neural Networks, 6: 933-946.
6. Jordan, M.I. 1990. Motor learning and the degree of freedom problem. In Attention and Performance, M. Jeannerod (Ed.), vol. 13, pp. 796-836.
7. Jordan, M.I. 1992. Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. Technical Report TR-9206. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, USA.
8. Jordan, M.I. and Rosenbaum, D.A. 1989. Action. In Foundations of Cognitive Science, M.I. Posner (Ed.), MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
9. Kawato, M., Furukawa, K., and Suzuki, R. 1987. A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement. Biological Cybernetics, 57:169-185.
10. Kawato, M. and Gomi, H. 1992. A computational model of four regions of the cerebellum based on feedback-error learning. Biological Cybernetics, 68:95-103.
11. Kohonen, T., Hynninen, J., Kangas, J., and Laaksonen, J. 1995. SOM-PAK: The self-organizing map program package. Technical Report, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, Rakentajanaukio 2 C, SF-02150 Espoo, Finland.
12. Kraaijveld, M.A., Mao, J., and Jain, A.K. 1992. A nonlinear projection method based on kohonen's topology preserving maps. In Proc. International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 41-45.
13. Kuniyoshi, Y. 1994. The science of imitation - Towards physically and socially grounded intelligence. RWC Technical Report, TR-94001.
14. Kuniyoshi, Y., Kita, N., Sugimoto, K., Nakamura, S., and Suehiro, T. 1995a. A foveated wide angle lens for active vision. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Japan, pp. 2982-2985.
15. Kuniyoshi, Y., Kita, N., Rougeaux, S., and Suehiro, T. 1995b. Active stereo vision system with foveated wide angle lenses. In Recent Developments in Computer Vision, S.Z. Li, D.P. Mital, E.K. Teoh, and H. Wang (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1035, Springer-Verlag, pp. 191-200.
16. Lucas, B. and Kanade, T. 1981. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In Proc. DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, pp. 121-130.
17. Meltzoff, A.N. and Moore, M.K. 1989. Imitation in newborn infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 25(6):954-962.
18. Murray, D.W., Bradshaw, K.J., McLauchlan, P.F., Reid, I.D., and Sharkey, P.M. 1995. Driving saccade to pursuit using image motion. International Journal of Computer Vision.
19. Nordlund P. and Uhlin, T. 1995. Closing the loop: Detection and pursuit of a moving object by a moving observer. Technical Report CVAP-175-95-7-173, Computational Vision and Active Perception Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
20. Piaget, J. 1962. Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood, W.W. Norton: New York.
21. Rougeaux, S., Kita, N., Kuniyoshi, S., Sakane, S., and Chavand, F. 1994. Binocular tracking based on virtual horopters. IEEE Proc. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Munich, Germany, pp. 2052-2057.
22. Rougeaux, S. and Kuniyoshi, Y. 1997. Velocity and disparity cues for robust real-time binocular tracking. IEEE Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Puerto-Rico, pp. 1-6.
23. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., and Williams, R.J. 1986. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323:533-536.
24. Sandini, G. and Tagliaso, V. 1980. An anthropomorphic retina-like structure for scene analysis. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 14(3):365-372.
25. Smagt, P. and Krose, B.J.A. 1991. A real-time learning neural robot controller. In Proc. International Conference on Neural Networks, Espoo, Finland, pp. 351-356.
26. Thelen, E. and Smith, L. 1994. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, Bradford Books.