Nonlinear stability of hybrid control

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 792-806

  Doulgeri, Zoe ^a   Fahantidis, Nikolaos ^a   Paul, Richard P ^b  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LYAPUNOV METHODS; MANIPULATORS; ROBOTICS; SYSTEM STABILITY;

HYBRID CONTROL;

CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0032115471     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/027836499801700708     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abbati-Marescotti, A., Bonivento, C., and Melchiorri, C. 1990. On the invariance of the hybrid position/force control. J. Intelligent and Robotic Sys. 3:233-250.
2. An, C. H., and Hollerbach, J. M. 1987 (Raleigh, NC). Dynamic stability issues in force control of Manipulators. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 890-896.
3. An, C. H., and Hollerbach, J. M. 1989. The role of dynamic models in Cartesian force control of manipulators. Int. J. Robotics Research 8(4):51-72.
4. Arimoto, S. 1995. Joint space orthogonalization and passivity for physical interpretations of dextrous robot motions under geometric constraints. Int. J. Robust and Nonlinear Control 5(4):269-284.
5. Duelen, G., Dlabka, M., Held, J., and Wendt, W. 1989. Force control of the industrial robots: The contact problem. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 6(2):109-115.
6. Duffy, J. 1990. The fallacy of modern hybrid control theory that is based on "orthogonal complement" of twist and wrench spaces. J. Robotic Sys. 7:139-144.
7. Eppinger, S. D., and Seering, W. P. 1986 (San Francisco, CA). On dynamic models of robot force control. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 29-34.
8. Fisher, W. D., and Mujtaba, M. S. 1992. Hybrid position/force control: A correct formulation. Int. J. Robotics Research 11(4):299-311.
9. Fisher, W. D., Mujtaba, M. S., and Sinha, P. 1992 (Raleigh, NC). A 2D study of hybrid position/force control. Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1980-1988.
10. Hogan, N. 1985. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part I-Theory, Part II-Implementation, Part III-Applications. ASME J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control 107:1-24.
11. Khatib, O. 1987. A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation RA3(1):43-53.
12. Lipkin, H., and Duffy, J. 1988. Hybrid twist and wrench control for a robotic manipulator. Trans. ASME J. Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 110:138-144.
13. Lloyd, J. 1988. RCI user's guide. Report CIM-88-22, McGill Research Center for Intelligent Machines, McGill University, Montreal.
14. Lloyd, J., Parker, M., and McClain, R. 1988 (Philadelphia,m PA). Extending the RCCL programming environment to multiple robots and processors. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 465-469.
15. McClamroch, N. H., and Wang, D. 1988. Feedback stabilization and tracking of constrained robots. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 33:419-426.
16. McClamroch, N. H., and Wang, D. 1990. Linear feedback control of position and contact force for a nonlinear constrained mechanism. J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control 112:640-645.
17. Mills, J. K. 1991. Hybrid control: A constrained motion perspective. J. Robotic Sys. 8(2):135-158.
18. Paul, R. P. 1981. Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming and Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Pease, M. C. 1965. Methods of Matrix Algebra. New York: Academic Press.
20. Raibert, M. H., and Craig, J. J. 1981. Hybrid position/force control of manipulators. ASME J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control 102:126-133.
21. Song, P., and Goldenberg, A. A. 1995. Analysis and design of position/force controllers. Part I: Decomposition. Submitted to IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation.
22. Strang, G. 1980. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.
23. Vukobratovic, M., and Stojic, R. 1995. Historical perspective of hybrid control in robotics: Beginnings, evolution, criticism and trends. Mech. Mach. Theory 30(4):519-532.
24. Wang, D., and McClamroch, N. H. 1993. Position and force control for constrained manipulator motion: Lyapunov direct method. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 9:308-313.
25. Whitney, D. E. 1987. Historical perspective and state of the art in robot force control. Int. J. Robotics Research 6(1):3-14.
26. Yabuta, T. 1992. Nonlinear basic stability concept of the hybrid position/force control scheme for robot manipulators. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 8(5):663-670.
27. Yoshikawa, T. 1986 (San Francisco, CA). Dynamic hybrid position/force control of robot manipulators-Description of hand constraints and calculation of joint driving force. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 1393-1398.
28. Zhang, H. 1989 (Scottsdale, AZ). Kinematic stability of robot manipulators under force control. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 80-85.
29. Zhang, H., and Paul, R. P. 1985 (St. Louis, MO). Hybrid control of robot manipulators. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 602-607.