Surface matching for object recognition in complex three-dimensional scenes

Image and Vision Computing

Volumn 16, Issue 9-10, 1998, Pages 635-651

  Johnson, A E ^a   Hebert, M ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

3D object recognition; Point correspondences; Surface matching

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; OPTICAL CORRELATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

SURFACE MATCHING;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 0032115386     PISSN: 02628856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(98)00074-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. P. Besl, N. McKay, A method for registration of 3-D shapes, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14 (2) (1992) 239-256.
2. R. Bergevin, D. Laurendeau, D. Poussart, Registering range views of multipart objects, Comput. Vision Image Understanding 61 (1) (1995) 1-16.
3. C. Chua, R. Jarvis, 3-D free-form surface registration and object recognition, Int. J. Comput. Vision 17 (1) (1996) 77-99.
4. J. Devore, Probability and Statistics for Engineering and Sciences, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA, 1987.
5. R. Duda, P. Hart, Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1973.
6. W.E.L. Grimson, Object Recognition by Computer: The Role of Geometric Constraints, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
7. A. Guéziec, N. Ayache, Smoothing and matching of 3-D space curves, Int. J. Comput. Vision 12 (1) (1994) 79-104.
8. B. Hon, Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions, J. Optic. Soc. Am. 4 (4) (1987) 629-642.
9. A. Johnson, M. Hebert, Control of mesh resolution for 3-D computer vision. Tech. Report CMURI-T,R-96-20, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996.
10. A. Johnson, R. Hoffman, J. Osborn, M. Hebert, A system for semi-automatically modeling of complex environments. Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM '97), Ottawa, Canada, 1997, pp. 213-220.
11. A. Johnson, M. Hebert, Object recognition by matching oriented points. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '97), San Juan, PR, 1997, pp. 684-689.
12. A. Johnson, Spin-images: a representation for 3-D surface matching. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, August 1997.
13. K. Ikeuchi, T. Shakunaga, M. Wheeler, T. Yamazaki, Invariant histograms and deformable template matching for SAR target recognition. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '96), , San Francisco, CA, 1996, pp. 100-105.
14. Y. Lamdan, H. Wolfson, Geometric hashing: a general and efficient model-based recognition scheme. Second Int. Conf. Computer Vision (ICCV '88), Tampa, FL, 1988, pp. 238-249.
15. F. Pipitone, W. Adams, Tripod operators for recognizing objects in range images; rapid rejection of library objects. IEEE Robotics and Automation (R and A '92), Nice, France, 1992, pp. 1596-1601.
16. D. Simon, M. Hebert, T. Kanade, Real-time 3-D pose estimation using a high-speed range sensor. IEEE Robotics and Automation (R and A '94), Pittsburgh, PA, 1994, pp. 2235-2241.
17. F. Stein, G. Medioni, Structural indexing: efficient 3-D object recognition, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14 (2) (1992) 125-145.
18. G. Taubin, A signal processing approach to fair surface design. ACM Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '95), New York, 1995, pp. 351-358.
19. J. Thirion, New feature points based on geometric invariants for 3D image registration, Int. J. Comput. Vision 18 (2) (1996) 121-137.
20. Z. Zhang, Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces, Int. J. Comput. Vision 13 (2) (1994) 119-152.