Nonspecific nasal mucosal reactivity, expressed as changes in nasal airway resistance after bilateral saline provocation

American Journal of Rhinology

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 275-278

  Haavisto, Lotta ^a   Sipilä, Jukka ^b   Suonpää, Jouko ^a  

^a TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b NONE   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; NOSE MUCOSA; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; NOSE PROVOCATION TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; RHINITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; NASAL MUCOSA; NASAL OBSTRUCTION; NASAL PROVOCATION TESTS; REFERENCE VALUES; RHINITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

EID: 0032114235     PISSN: 10506586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2500/105065898781390082     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Olive-Perez A. The nasal provocation test in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. II. Comparison with other diagnostic tests. Rhinology 26:175-181, 1988.
2. Pelikan Z. The diagnostic approach to immediate hypersensitivity in patients with allergic rhinitis: A comparison of nasal challenges and serum RAST. Ann Allergy 51:395-400, 1983.
3. McLean JA, Mathews KP, Ciarkowski AA, et al. The effects of topical saline and isoproterenol on nasal airway resistance. J Allergy Clin Immunol 58:563-574, 1976.
4. Filiaci F, Zambetti G. Aspecific nasal reactivity in allergic and non-allersic rhinooathv. Rhinoloev 21:329-334. 1983.
5. Mullins RJ, Oison LG, Sutherland DC. Nasal histamine challenges in symptomatic allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 83:955-959, 1989.
6. Cockcroft DW, Berscheid BA. Correlation of bronchial responsiveness to diluent and to histamine. Ann Allergy 49:139-141, 1982.
7. Van de Heyning PH, Van Haesendonck J, Creten W. Histamine nasal provocation test. An evaluation of active anterior rhinomanometry and of threshold criteria of provocative dose. Allergy 44:482-486, 1989.
8. Schlenter WW. Rhinomanometric measurements in the course of INT. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 234:11-13, 1982.
9. Birchall MA, Henderson JC, Studham JM, et al. The effect of topical sodium cromoglycate on intranasal histamine challenge in allergic rhinitis. Clin Otolaryngol 19:521-525, 1994.
10. Sipilä JI, Suonpää JT, Salmivalli AJ, Laippala P. The effect of the nasal cycle on the interpretation of rhinomanometric results in a nasal provocation test. Am J Rhinology 4:179-184, 1990.
11. Clement PAR. Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. Rhinology 22:151-155, 1984.
12. Guercio JP, Birch S, Fernandez RJ, Sackner MA. Deposition of ragweed pollen and extract on nasal mucosa of patients with allergic rhinitis: Effect on nasal airflow resistance and nasal mucus velocity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 66:61-69, 1980.
13. Solomon WR. Nasal provocative testing. In: Provocation Testing in Clinical Practice. Spector SL. (Ed.), Marcel Dekker, 1995, pp. 647-692.
14. Krayenbuhl MC, Hudspith BN, Scadding GK, et al. Nasal response to allergen and hyperosmolar challenge. Clin Allergy 18:157-164, 1988.
15. Krayenbuhl MC, Hudspith BN, Brostoff J, et al. Nasal histamine release following hyperosmolar and allergen challenge. Allergy 44:25-29, 1989.
16. Sipilä J, Suonpää J, Laippala P. Evaluation of nasal resistance data in active anterior rhinomanometry with special reference to clinical usefulness and test-retest analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 17: 170-177, 1992. D