Efficacy of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Using Echo-planar Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Tumors

Nippon Acta Radiologica

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 441-446

  Yoshino, Ayako ^a  

^a KYORIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast, tumor; Echo planar imaging; MR imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; PATHOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, PAPILLARY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0032111318     PISSN: 00480428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al: MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations.Radiology 171: 95-103, 1989
2. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB, et al: Breast disease:tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 174: 491-494, 1990
3. Iachiya J, Seki T, Okada M, et al: MR imaging of the breast with gadopentate dimeglumine enhancement:comparison with mammography and ultrasonography. Radiat Med 9: 491-494, 1991
4. Kaiser WA, Reiser M: False positive cases in dynamic MR mammography (abstr). Radiology 185 (p): 245, 1992
5. Heywang-Koebrunner SH: Diagnosis of breast cancer with MR-review after 1250 patient examinations. Electromedica 61: 43-52, 1993
6. Harms SE, Flaming DP, Hesly KL, et al: MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of the excitation off resonance;clinical experience with pathologic correlation.Radiology 187: 493-501, 1993
7. Botes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al: MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced Turbo-FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 193: 777-781, 1994
8. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, et al: Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 190: 485-493, 1994
9. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, et al: Diagnostic performance characteristic of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR 169: 409-415, 1997
10. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, et al: Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with Echo-planar MR imaging.Radiology 197: 33-38, 1995
11. Kuhl CK, Bieling H, Gieseke J, et al: Breast neoplasms;T2* susceptibility-contrast, first pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 202: 87-95, 1997
12. Peeters PHM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, et al: Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen-report of six screening rounds, 1975-1986. Int J cancer 43: 226-230, 1989
13. Schelling M, Gnirs J, Braun M, et al: Optimized differential diagnosis of breast lesions by combined B-mode and color Doppler sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10: 48-53, 1997
14. Fletcher SW: Why question screening mammography for women in their forties? Radiologic clinics of North America 33: 1259-1271, 1995
15. Spivey GH, Perry BW, Clark VA, et al: Predicting the risk of cancer at the time of breast biopsy. Am Surg 48: 326-332, 1982
16. Passe TJ, Bluemke DA, Siegelman SS: Tumor angiogenesis: tutorial on implications for imaging. Radiology 203, 1997