Apparent contrast and spatial frequency of local texture elements

Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 1733-1739

  Ellemberg, Dave ^a   Wilkinson, Frances ^a   Wilson, Hugh R ^b   Arsenault, A Serge ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032109994     PISSN: 10847529     EISSN: 15208532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.15.001733     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Y. Ejima and S. Takahashi, “Apparent contrast of a sinusoidal grating in the simultaneous presence of peripheral gratings,” Vision Res. 25, 1223–1232 (1985).
2. C. Chubb, G. Sperling, and J. A. Solomon, “Texture interactions determine perceived contrast,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 9631–9635 (1989).
3. W. M. Cannon and S. C. Fullenkamp, “Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations,” Vision Res. 31, 1985–1998 (1991).
4. D. M. MacKay, “Lateral interaction between neural channels sensitive to texture density?” Nature 245, 159–161 (1973).
5. S. Klein, C. F. Stromeyer, and L. Ganz, “The simultaneous spatial frequency shift: a dissociation between the detection and perception of gratings,” Vision Res. 14, 1421–1432 (1974).
6. F. Wilkinson, H. R. Wilson, and D. Ellemberg, “Lateral interactions in peripherally-viewed texture arrays,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2057–2068 (1996).
7. T. A. Nazir, “Effects of lateral masking and spatial precueing on gap-resolution in central and peripheral vision,” Vision Res. 32, 771–777 (1992).
8. R. J. Jacobs, “Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery,” Vision Res. 19, 1187–1195 (1979).
9. H. Bouma, “Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition,” Nature 226, 177–178 (1970).
10. F. Wilkinson and R. Peterson, “Spatial limits to the perception of textural coherence,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Supp. 30, 254 (1989).
11. F. Wilkinson and H. R. Wilson, “Measurement of the texture coherence limit for bandpass arrays,” Perception (to be published).
12. R. F. Quick, “A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection,” Kybernetik 16, 1299–1302 (1974).
13. W. A. Weibull, “A statistical distribution function of wide applicability,” J. Appl. Mech. 18, 292–297 (1951).
14. M. W. Cannon and S. C. Fullenkamp, “A model for inhibitory lateral interaction effects in perceived contrast,” Vision Res. 36, 1115–1125 (1996).
15. N. Graham, “Complex channels, early local nonlinearities, and normalization in texture segregation,” in Computational Models of Vision Processing, M. Landy and J. A. Movshon, eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1991).
16. J. A. Movshon, I. D. Thompson, and D. J. Tolhurst, “Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat’s striate cortex,” J. Physiol. (London) 283, 79–99 (1978).
17. M. E. Chevreul, De la loi du contraste simulanté des couleurs: et de l’assortiment des objets colorés, consideré d’aprés cette loi (Pitois-Levrault, et ce., Paris, 1839)
18. M. E. Chevreul, The Principles of Harmony and Contrast of Colors and Their Applications to the Arts, original English translation in 1854, republished in 1967 (Reinhold, New York, 1839).
19. E. G. Heinemann, “Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of induction- and test-field luminances,” J. Exp. Psychol. 50, 89–96 (1955).
20. E. G. Heinemann, “Simultaneous brightness induction,” in Handbook of Sensory Physiology, D. Jameson and L. M. Hurvich, eds. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972), pp. 146–149.
21. A. Sutter, G. Sperling, and C. Chubb, “Measuring the spatial frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms,” Vision Res. 35, 915–924 (1995).