A field study of the industrial modeling process

Modeling, Identification and Control

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 153-174

  Foss, B A ^a   Lohmann, B ^b   Marquardt, W ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Case study approach; Computer aided modeling; Dynamic modeling; Process models

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PLANNING; PROCESS CONTROL; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; SCHEDULING;

CHEMICAL PROCESS INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL MODELING PROCESS;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 0032108406     PISSN: 03327353     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4173/mic.1998.3.3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ADLER, R. M. (1995). Emerging standards for component software. IEEE Computer, 28, 68-77.
2. ARIS, R. (1991). Manners makyth modellers. Trans. IChemE, 69, 165-174.
3. BARTON, P. I. and PANTELIDES, C. C. (1994). Modeling of combined discrete/continuous processes. AICHE J, 40, 966-979.
4. BOGUSCH, R., LOHMANN, B. and MARQUARDT, W. (1996). Computer-aided process modeling with MODKIT. In: Proc. Chemputers Europe III. McGraw Hill, Frankfurt.
5. BRÜLL, L., HUBBUCH, F. and QUEST, S. (1997). Process simulation on heterogeneous networks. Computers chem. Engng. Submitted for publication.
6. CARROLL, J. M. (1995). Scenario-Based Design. Wiley, New York.
7. CURTIS, B., KRASNER, H. and ISCOE, N. (1988). A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31, 1268-1287.
8. DENN, M. M. (1985). Process Modeling. Longman, New York.
9. DÖMGES, R., POHL, K., JARKE, M., LOHMANN, B. and MARQUARDT, W. (1996). PRO-ART/CE -An environment for managing the evolution of chemical process simulation models. In: Proc. 10th European Simulation Multiconference ( A. Javor, A. Lehmann and I. Molnar, Eds.), pp. 1012-1017. Society for Computer Simulation International Budapest.
10. DRENGSTIG, T., WASBØ, S. and Foss, B. A. (1997). A formal graphical based process modeling methodology. Computers chem. ENgng, 21, S835-S840.
11. ELMQVIST, H., JEANDEL, A., MATTSON, S. E., SAHLIM, P. and OTTER, M. (1997). Modelica - language design for multi-formalism modeling. ESPRIT Project Simulation in Europe Basic Research Working Group. http://www.Dynasim.se/Modelica/.
12. FINKELSTEIN, A., KRAMER, J. and NUSEIBEH, B. (1994). Software Process Modeling and Technology. Wiley, New York.
13. GAWTHROP, P. and SMITH, L. (1996). Metamodelling: Bond Graphs and Dynamic Systems. Prentice Hall, London.
14. HAMMER, M. and CHAMPY, J. (1995). Business Reengineering. Campus, Frankfurt.
15. JARKE, M. and MARQUARDT, W. (1996). Design and evaluation of computer-aided process modeling tools. In. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems in Process Engng ISP'95. AICHE Symposium Series No. 312 (J. F. Davis, G. Stephanopoulos and V. Venkatasubramaniam, Eds.), Vol. 92, pp. 97-109. CACHE Publications, Danvers, MA.
16. JOHANSEN, T. A. and Foss, B. A. (1997). Operating regime based process modelling and identification. Computers chem. Engng, 21, 159-176.
17. KING, J. M. P. and BAÑARES-ALCÁNTARA, R. (1996). The extension and evolution of the process design representation. Computers chem. Engng, 20, S171-S176.
18. KOLODNER, J. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA.
19. KRÖNER, A., HOLL, P., MARQUARDT, W. and GILLES, E. D. (1990). DIVA - An open architecture for dynamic simulation. Computers chem. Engng, 14, 1289-1295.
20. LJUNG, L. (1987). System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
21. LJUNG, L. (1997). Nonlinear black-box models in system identification. In: Preprints Int. Symp. on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes ADCHEM'97. Bannff, Canada, pp. 1-12.
22. LOHMANN, B. and MARQUARDT, W. (1996). On the systemization of the process of model development. Computers chem. Engng, 20, S213-S218.
23. MARQUARDT, W. (1991). Dynamic process simulation - recent trends and future challenges. In: Chemical Process Control CPC-IV (Y. Arkun and W. H. Ray, Eds.), pp. 131-180. CACHE Publications, New York.
24. MARQUARDT, W. (1996). Trends in computer-aided modeling. Computers chem. Engng, 20, 59-609.
25. MCKAY, A., BLOOR, M. S. and DE PENNINGTON, A. (1996). A framework for product data. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engng, 8, 825-838.
26. OAKLAND, J. S. (1989). Total quality management. In: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Total Quality Management, pp. 3-17. Cotswold Press.
27. PANTELIDES, C. C. (1988). Speedup - recent advances in process simulation. Computers chem. Engng, 12, 745-755.
28. PANTELIDES, C. C. and BRITT, H. I. (1994). Multi-purpose process modeling environments. In: Foundations Computer-Aided Design Conf. FOCAPD'94, pp. 128-141. CACHE Publications, Snowmass, CO.
29. POHL, K. (1996). Process Control Requirements Engineering. Wiley, New York.
30. PONTON, J. (1995). Process systems engineering: Halfway through the first century. Chemical Engn. Sci., 50(24), 4045-4059.
31. SPURR, K., LAYZELL, P., JENNISON, L. and RICHARDS, N. (1994). Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Wiley, New York.
32. STEPHANOPOULOS, G., HENNING, G. and LEONE, H. (1990). Model.la. A language for process engineering, Part I and II. Computers chem. Engng, 14, 813-869.
33. WESTERBERG, A. (1996). Distributed and collaborative computer-aided environments in process engineering design. In: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems in Process Engng ISPE'95. AICHE Symposium Series No. 312 (J. F. Davis, G. Stephanopoulos, Eds), Vol. 92, pp. 184-194. CACHE Publications, Danvers, MA.
34. WESTERBERG, A., SUBRAHMANIAM, E., REICH, Y, KONDA, S. and n-dim group (1997). Designing the process design process. Computers chem. Engng, 21, S1-S9.
35. YIN, R. K. (1984). Case Study Research - Design and Methods. Sage Publications, London.