Looking to care or caring to look? technology and the rise of spectacular nursing

Holistic Nursing Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 1-11

  Sandelowski, Margarete ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fetal maternal nursing; Nursing informatics; Nursing observation; Prenatal diagnosis; Technology

Indexed keywords

EMPATHY; HOLISTIC NURSING; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; OBSERVATION; REVIEW;

EMPATHY; ETHICS, NURSING; HOLISTIC NURSING; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING ASSESSMENT; OBSERVATION; TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL;

EID: 0032106968     PISSN: 08879311     EISSN: 15505138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004650-199807000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. The nurse. In: The Nightingale (Annual of Rex Hospital Training School for Nursing). Raleigh, NC: Rex Hospital Library/Archives; 1923
2. Nightingale F. Notes on Nursing: What It Is and What It Is Not. New York: Dover; 1969
3. Bankert M. Watchful Care: A History of America’s Nurse Anesthetists. New York: Continuum; 1989
4. Symonds A. Angels and interfering busybodies: The social construction of two occupations. Soc Health Illness. 1991;13:249-264
5. Mason J. Qualitative Researching. London: Sage; 1996
6. Walters SD. Material Girls: Making Sense of Feminist Cultural Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1995
7. Strathem M. Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship, and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press; 1992
8. Lemer BH. The perils of “x-ray vision”: How radio-graphic images have historically influenced perception. Perspect Biol Med. 1992;35:382-397
9. Ihde D. Instrumental Realism: The Interface Between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1991
10. Sandelowski M. Channel of desire: Fetal ultrasonography in two use-contexts. Qual Health Res. 1994; 4:262-280
11. Petchesky RP. Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. In: Stanworth M, ed. Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood, and Medicine. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1987
12. Ginsburg F. The “word-made” flesh: The disembodiment of gender in the abortion debate. In: Ginsburg F, Tsing AL, eds. Uncertain Terms: Negotiating Gender in American Culture. Boston: Beacon; 1990
13. Newman K. Fetal Positions: Individualism, Science, Visuality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1996
14. Sandelowski M. Knowing and forgetting: The challenge of technology for a reflexive practice science of nursing. In: Thome S, Hayes J, eds. Nursing Praxis: Knowledge and Action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997
15. Sandelowski M. “Making the best of things”: Technology in American nursing, 1870-1940. Nurs Hist Rev. 1997;5:3-22
16. Harmer B. Textbook of the Principles and Practice of Nursing. New York: Macmillan; 1922
17. Tanner CA, Benner P, Chesla C, Gordon DR. The phenomenology of knowing the patient. Image. 1993; 25:273-280
18. Rafferty A. Decorous didactics: Early explorations in the art and science of caring, circa 1860-90. In: Kitson A, ed. Nursing: Art and Science. London: Chapman & Hall; 1993
19. Armstrong D. The fabrication of nurse-patient relationships. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17:457-460
20. Jecker NS, Self DJ. Separating care and cure: An analysis of historical and contemporary images of nursing and medicine. J Med Phil. 1991;16:285-306
21. Houston WR. The Art of Treatment. New York: Macmillan; 1937
22. Reverby SM. A legitimate relationship: Nursing, hospitals, and science in the twentieth century. In: Long DE, Golden J, eds. The American General Hospital: Communities and Social Contexts. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1989
23. Lynaugh J. Narrow passageways: Nurses and physicians in conflict and concert since 1875. In: King NM, Churchill LR, Cross AW, eds. The Physician as Captain of the Ship: A Critical Reappraisal. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel; 1988
24. Ihde D. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1990
25. Ihde D. Technics and Praxis. Boston: Dordrecht; 1979
26. Treichler PA, Cartwright L. Introduction: Imaging technologies, inscribing science. Camera Obscura. 1992;28:5-18
27. Harris RM. Symposium on the nurse and the new machinery. Nurs Clin North Am. 1966;1:535-536
28. Sandelowski M. (Ir)Reconcilable differences? The debate concerning nursing and technology. Image. 1997;29:169-174
29. Parker J. Searching for the body in nursing. In: Gray G, Pratt R, eds. Scholarship In the Discipline of Nursing. Melbourne, Australia: Churchill Livingstone; 1995
30. May C. Nursing work, nurses’ knowledge, and the subjectification of the patient. Soc Health Illness. 1992;14:472-487
31. Amey WR. Power and the Profession of Obstetrics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1982
32. Dougherty CM. Surveillance. In: Bulechek GM, McCloskey JC, eds. Nursing Intervention: Essential Nursing Treatments. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992
33. Titler MG: Interventions related to surveillance. Nurs Clin North Am. 1992;27:495-515
34. Armstrong D. The rise of surveillance medicine. Soc Health Illness. 1995;17:393-404
35. Cartwright L. Screening the Body: Tracing Medicine’s Visual Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1995
36. Hartouni V. Fetal exposures: Abortion politics and the optics of allusion. Camera Obscura. 1992;29:130-149
37. Kember S. Medical diagnostic imaging: The geometry of chaos. New Formations. 1991;15:55-66
38. Lynch M, Woolgar S. Representation in Scientific Practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1988
39. Pasveer B. Knowledge of shadows: The introduction of X-ray images in medicine. Soc Health Illness. 1989;11:360-381
40. Stafford BM. Voyeur or observer? Enlightenment thoughts on the dilemmas of display. Configurations. 1993;1:95-128
41. Treichler PA, Cartwright L, eds. Imaging technologies, inscribing science. Camera Obscura. 1992;28-29. SpecialIssues
42. Cheek J, Rudge T. The panopticon revisited? An exploration of the social and political dimensions of contemporary health care and nursing practice. Inti Nurs Stud. 1994;31:583-591
43. Parker J, Wiltshire J. The handover: Three modes of nursing practice knowledge. In: Gray G, Pratt R, eds. Scholarship in the Discipline of Nursing. Melbourne, Australia: Churchill Livingstone; 1995
44. Ray MA. Technological caring: A new model in critical care. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1987;6:166-173
45. Jones CB, Alexander JW. The technology of caring: A synthesis of technology and caring for nursing administration. NursAdm Q. 1993;17:11-20
46. Locsin RC. Machine technologies and caring in nursing. Image. 1995;27:201-204
47. Bottorff JL, Morse JM. Identifying types of attending: Patterns of nurses’ work. Image. 1994;26:53-60
48. Allan JD, Hall BA. Challenging the focus on technology: A critique of the medical model. Adv Nurs Sci. 1988;10:22-33
49. Lovell M. The politics of medical deception: Challenging the trajectory of history. Adv Nurs Sci. 1980; 2:73-86
50. Sandelowski M. A case of conflicting paradigms: Nursing and reproductive technology. Adv Nurs Sci. 1988;10:35-45
51. Franklin S. Fetal fascinations: New dimensions to the medical-scientific construction of fetal personhood. In: Franklin S, Lury C, Stacey J, eds. Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies. New York: Harper-Collins; 1991
52. Casper MJ. At the margins of humanity: Fetal positions in science and medicine. Sci Technol Hum Values. 1994;19:307-323
53. Duden B. Disembodying Women: Perspectives on Pregnancy and the Unborn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993
54. Adams A. Out of the womb: The future of the uterine metaphor. Femin Stud. 1993;19:269-289
55. Duden B. Visualizing “life.” Sci Cult. 1993;17:562-600
56. Farquhar D. The Other Machine: Discourse and Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge; 1996
57. Lor JS. The public fetus and the family car: From abortion politics to a Volvo advertisement. Public Cult. 1992;4:67-80
58. Biddick K. Stranded histories: Feminist allegories of artificial life. Res Phil Technol. 1993;13:165-182
59. Stabile CA. Shooting the mother: Fetal photography and the politics of disappearance. Camera Obscura. 1992;28:179-205
60. Cartwright L. Women, X-rays, and the public culture of prophylactic imaging. Camera Obscura. 1992; 29:18-54
61. Bosk CL. All God’s Mistakes: Genetic Counseling in a Pediatric Hospital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992
62. Adams AE. Reproducing the Womb: Images of Childbirth in Science, Feminist Theory, and Literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1994
63. Kovit L. Babies as social products: The social determinants of classification. Soc Sci Med. 1978;12:347-351
64. Layne LL. Of fetuses and angels: Fragmentation and integration in narratives of pregnancy loss. Knowledge Soc. 1992;9:29-58
65. Lovell A. Some questions of identity: Late miscarriage, stillbirth and perinatal loss. Soc Sci Med. 1983; 17:755-761
66. Primeau MR, Recht CK. Professional bereavement photographs: One aspect of a perinatal bereavement program. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs. 1994;23:22-25
67. Reddin SK. The photography of stillborn children and neonatal deaths. J Audiovisual Media Med. 1987; 10: 49-51
68. Sandelowski M, Harris BG, Holditch-Davis D. Pregnant moments: The process of conception in infertile couples. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:273-282
69. Kim HS. The Nature of Theoretical Thinking in Nursing. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1983
70. Van Dyck J. Manufacturing Babies and Public Consent: Debating the New Reproductive Technologies. New York: New York University Press; 1995